come on, just say it, 秘密の GIRLS TALK ♡ 甘く bitter, 時々spicy >< every day 打ち明けてよ hush, hush! we can't stop, ねえ ほら KISS AND TELL 🌟 groups! idid 🌟 psychic fever 🌟 stayc 🌟 kiss of life 🌟 enhypen girls >.< 🌟 ive: gaeul ♡ wonyoung ♡ rei ♡ liz 🌟 say my name: dohee 🌟 nmixx: haewon & bae 🌟 triples: nakyoung 🌟 baby dont cry: kumi ♡ yihyun 🌟 newjeans: haerin & hyein ♡ hyein 🌟 loona: vivi & haseul & yeojin 🌟 babymonster: rami ♡ …

Channel
неконами. 𖦹 ׂ 𓈒
@forkittyasa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
212subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003378222308 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @forkittyasa |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/forkittyasa |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 212 | +6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 206 | +13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 193 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 193 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 28.7%
- avg views ÷ 212 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 60.8
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 25.6%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (7 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 912 |
| Reactions total | 209 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 29s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
209 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5287303396498384766 | 72 | 34.4% | |
| custom 5467375071523807768 | 71 | 34.0% | |
| custom 5467744485955901495 | 66 | 31.6% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ᅠᅠᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠᅠᅠ ᅠᅠᅠ kim juhoon is a south korean singer in the boy group cortis. born january 3,2008, in seoul. a tale about juhoon… cat - person 中 mssg « какими бы ни были слова других людей и какие бы ситуации ни происходили,я хочу иметь собственное чувство стабильности,которое не позволит мне пошатнуться. тогда,думаю,я смогу не потерять себя »
Video, posted without a caption
11 aug, 도트 무늬 ︎𑁍ࠬ weverse via : +.• счастливого вторника 🤍
custom 52873033964983847665custom 54673750715238077685custom 54677444859559014955
# тикток ݁ 𓇬◌۫ 업뎃 🤩 10 / 08 : charismatic, energetic
custom 52873033964983847667custom 54677444859559014957custom 54673750715238077686
𓆹 t.me/нонгпрэ – ▎in the stillness the artist weaves ▎a tapestry of moments untold yet ▎where silence speaks louder words ▎and the heart beats in rhythm with ▎the echoes of what was once pure. стихотворение,w,на краски
10 / 08 ♬˚₊‧ 🤩 обновление #виверса ахён « 포토 by asa🐰»
custom 52873033964983847668custom 54677444859559014956custom 54673750715238077685
facecard & sweestest voice. ♡♡
custom 52873033964983847668custom 54673750715238077688custom 54677444859559014958
Posted without readable text
custom 52873033964983847668custom 54673750715238077688custom 54677444859559014957
asa’s moon mini-log ❥・•
custom 54677444859559014958custom 52873033964983847667custom 54673750715238077687
MBC260808방송 ৎ выступление, fullcam & asacam.
custom 546737507152380776810custom 54677444859559014959custom 52873033964983847668
݁08th aug 𓆱 namichan wrote a post. =zalabimzalabamzalaboom?
custom 54673750715238077689custom 52873033964983847668custom 54677444859559014957
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @forkittyasa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 818,114 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@allmega100 · 82 posts🔭
@coopasmi · 32 posts𓏲ּ𝄢ソース📹,би саýрс ˚࿔
@baiwaly · 3031 postmoonveil⁷
@enmoonveil · 1151 post⸼࣪ ֢ ୭ৎ my kitties 𝗸𝗶𝘀𝘀 of life 🗯
@girlslovekiof · 2371 post별 yoümi gũmmy
@gummyoum · 1431 postive ever aliveִ ࣪ ˖ ࣪
@iheartive · 1061 postNyoungette ⊹ ✧ wonyoung ive
@jangitgirl · 1501 postNAME组合
@NameCpopChinepop · 1941 postpsychic fever ᡣ𐭩.ᐟ
@psychicfeverrrrrr · 1191 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@babydontcry4 · 1051 post୧ ⚖˚.ㅤБэвонфилия
@chagaedyu · 1531 postcuddly zheyi
@cuddlyzheyi · 1171 post( !! ) 𝗳ix of̲f̲ . . ౨
@fixoffgi · 1931 postfor liz
@forlizzz · 1801 post⸼࣪ ֢ ୭ৎ my kitties 𝗸𝗶𝘀𝘀 of life 🗯
@girlslovekiof · 2371 posthyeińology 🍈 𓂋 ‧ ₊ ˚
@hyeinology · 1501 postidid ⋆ fly!
@ididville · 1451 postive ever aliveִ ࣪ ˖ ࣪
@iheartive · 1061 postNyoungette ⊹ ✧ wonyoung ive
@jangitgirl · 1501 postkyungmin just being kyungmin
@justkyungmin · 1211 post⌗ it's yookyo ⋆
@keeholuv · 1501 postwave to leehan
@leehanie_bnd · 1291 postthe season called 미챙
@michaenganthem · 1411 postmy tiny yena ◞ ꙳ ⋆ ִֶָ ๋𓂃 ⋆
@mytinyyenaa · 1831 postнонгпрэ́ 🔒
@nongpree · 401 post•.˚od͟d͟eul.. 🏔️
@oddeul · 1441 postポブジ kumi ֯ 𝄞⋆ ݁♪ .
@plushiekumi · 1331 postpuddıngz
@puddingzduo · 1961 post. 𖧷 ֗ ˖ 다정 / пу́шелла ⛲️
@pushstella · 1101 poststay with stayc 𖦹 stay closer
@stayc_up · 1211 post晴jju⛅️
@sunnyjuwang · 1401 postyihyunese
@yihyunese · 2031 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@forkittyasa named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026 · confirmed gone 27 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“неконами. 𖦹 ׂ 𓈒” (@forkittyasa), 212 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forkittyasa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.