Channel
@forsov_vibe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003468674429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @forsov_vibe |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/forsov_vibe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 160 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 170 | +26 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 144 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 143 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 143 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 10 | 26.3% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 26.3% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 21.1% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодняшняя новость. В очередной раз повторяю. Не отправляйте звезды/подарки в тг незнакомым лицам. А тем более, не отправляйте их террористам/экстремистам/противникам. ДАЖЕ случайная отправка без умысла может ДЕЙСТВИТЕЛЬНО обернуться большими проблемами
Signed Alexey Forsov [4/21]
Добавили кстати оплату криптоботом. Комиссия 1%. Если храните бабки в кб (то вы зря это делаете, но не суть) — кидаете чек в IceScan, оплачиваете любой QR (от 50 руб) с более выгодным курсом и намного быстрее @IceScan_bot
Signed Alexey Forsov [в отпуске, долгие ответы]
@IceScan_bot — РЕЛИЗ!! Оплата СБП криптой. @IceScan_bot Пополняешь баланс USDT TON, сканируешь qr в магазине, оплачиваешь его. Курс и скорость намного лучше, чем в том же кб IcePay (криптокошелек) все еще в разработке, icescan — только модуль оплаты СБП
❤1👏1
Signed Alexey Forsov [в отпуске, долгие ответы]
Повторюсь сейчас. Дурову* сейчас закидывают активно подарки/пишут ему в комменты за звёзды Если вы думаете, что менты тупые и не найдут вас через "анонимный телеграм", то вы очень заблуждаетесь) У ментов АВТОМАТИЧЕСКИЕ парсеры ресурсов Дурова* и АВТОМАТИЧЕСКИЕ "деанонимизаторы" (хз как назвать это правильно). И даже если 90% действительно мастера анонимности, сидящие за 10 проксями, то 10% дурачков остаются. Поса…
🤣2💋1💩1🤡1🥰1
Signed Alexey Forsov
Курс КБ 73.9, курс icepay 76.41 Разница огромна (~3,3%) Релиз скоро
❤1🤮1
Signed Alexey Forsov
Новые посты в тг. Прикольно выглядят
Signed Alexey Forsov
Posted without readable text
💩1
Signed Alexey Forsov
Вышел Claude Opus 5. Посмотрел бенчмарки, потестил немного, глянул видосики. Могу сказать 3 вещи: 1) На Opus 4.8 можно было уже сделать ВСЁ что угодно в плане вайбкодинга. Любые вайбкод-проекты (не связанные с точной наукой, исследованиями и т.д). Как следствие, фейбл 5 не сильно то мне и нужен оказался 2) Opus 5 по тестам ТУПО БЫСТРЕЕ и ДЕШЕВЛЕ чем Opus 4.8. По скорости до 60% быстрее на реальных сценариях + мень…
🔥2
Signed Alexey Forsov
Не отписывайтесь пж. Проебался — бывает
🤣4😁3
Signed Alexey Forsov
Ладно :(
🤣4😁2
Signed Alexey Forsov
Расскажем ему, что некастодиальный кошелёк есть в тг уже очень давно?
😁3❤2👎1
Signed Alexey Forsov
Продолжая теорию заговора вселенского масштаба Не верю я в такие совпадения Плюс отрицательный прогноз экономиста и рост рынка Очевидно, что рост связан с фиксацией шорт позиций (после лоббирования новостной повестки, вероятно (как мне кажется), скоординированной группой новостников. Как следствие, ситуация выглядит как жесткий троллинг. Вообще хотелось бы детально изучить причину блокировки телеграма в РФ со стор…
Signed Alexey Forsov
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @forsov_vibe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“вайб форсова” (@forsov_vibe), 160 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forsov_vibe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.