🔻مروری بر مهمترین اخبار و گزارشهای فولادبان در 14 آبان 1405 🔹در گفتوگو با فولادبان ارائه شد؛ دولت هم خدا را میخواهد و هم خرما را/ رقابت جهانی فولاد با قواعد داخلی ممکن نیست 🔹ریشه تعرفهگذاری کشورهای همسایه روی محصولات نوردی ما در چیست؟ 🔹 دلار هزار و ۴۷۰ تومان بیشتر از لیر ارزان شد/ افزایش طلا در بازار آزاد 🔹کپسول خبری جنگ ۱۴ آبان تشدید تنش در اطراف ایران/ اختلاف در واشنگتن بر سر ادامه جنگ 🔹صعود سنگآهن دا…

Channel
فولادبان (Fouladban)
@fouladban
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,035subscribers
-637 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001494063918 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fouladban |
| Description | پایگاه اطلاعرسانی فولادبان اطلاعرسانی درباره #بورس #آهن #فولاد #فلزات و #ارز و اخبار روز مرتبط با صنعت و معدن . وبسایت: www.fouladban.com . برای سفارش تبلیغات با این شماره تماس بگیرید: 09109754532 |
| Created | 17 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fouladban |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:00 | 11,035 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:38 | 11,033 | +1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:19 | 11,032 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:29 | 11,039 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 11,048 | -13 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:01 | 11,061 | -12 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:51 | 11,073 | +3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:29 | 11,070 | -8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 11,078 | -19 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:09 | 11,097 | -14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:27 | 11,111 | -22 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:35 | 11,133 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:44 | 11,147 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 11,146 | -8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:36 | 11,154 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:06 | 11,165 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 11,170 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 11,182 | -25 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:21 | 11,207 | -17 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 12:28 | 11,224 | first reading |
Engagement
599 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.31%
- avg views ÷ 11,035 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 255
- 68 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.06%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 68
- of 599 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 599 (6 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 17,369 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 20:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈62,800
- Videos
- ≈5,080
- Links
- ≈35,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 44m
- Average length
- 1m 41s
Measured directly from 62 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
149 reactions across 94 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 49.7% | |
| 👍 | 42 | 28.2% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 13.4% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 8.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 599 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 599 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 68 posts held from the last 30 days (13.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎥بالغبر ۸۰ درصد اقتصاد ایران دولتی است! 🔹محمد خاکی، رئیس اتاق بازرگانی لرستان توضیح میدهد. #بازگشت_ارز #کارت_بازرگانی
🔻کپسول خبری صنعت فولاد ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ دستور رئیسجمهور برای مدیریت مصرف انرژی و جلوگیری از توقف تولید/ واگذاری کارگزاری ۱۰ معدن راکد در سمنان 🔹 دستور رئیسجمهور برای مدیریت مصرف انرژی؛ جلوگیری از توقف تولید در اولویت قرار گرفت مسعود پزشکیان در جلسه هماهنگی بهینهسازی مصرف انرژی، به استانداران دستور داد کارگروههای تخصصی مدیریت مصرف تشکیل دهند. وی همچنین بر ایجاد سامانه پایش عملکرد استانها و جلوگیری از قطع انرژی واحد…
Sticker, posted without a caption
گزارش فولادبان از بورس فلزات لندن؛ 🔻قراضه ترکیه در قراردادهای لندن از ۴۰۶ دلار عبور کرد/ میلگرد روی ۶۱۵ دلار ایستاد 🔹️به گزارش فولادبان، دادههای پایانی قراردادهای فولادی بورس فلزات لندن در ۵ نوامبر، از قرار گرفتن قرارداد قراضه وارداتی ترکیه در محدوده ۴۰۶.۵ دلار و میلگرد صادراتی این کشور در سطح ۶۱۵ دلار بهازای هر تن حکایت دارد. در بازار محصولات تخت نیز قرارداد ورق گرم چین در محدوده ۴۸۲ دلار قرار گرفت. 🔹️بر اساس دا…
❤2
🔻کپسول خبری صنعت فولاد جهان ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ بهبود عملکرد آرسلورمیتال و افت موجودی فولاد چین/ کاهش صادرات ترکیه و تغییر مسیر تأمین مواد اولیه هند فولادبان گزارش میدهد؛ بازار جهانی فولاد در تازهترین تحولات خود شاهد بهبود عملکرد مالی برخی تولیدکنندگان، کاهش موجودی انبارهای تجاری چین و تداوم ضعف صادرات فولاد ترکیه بوده است. همزمان، تغییر ترکیب تأمین زغالسنگ ککشوی هند، تحرکات تازه در پروژههای فولادی آسیا و آفریقا و ا…
Sticker, posted without a caption
گزارش فولادبان از بورس لندن؛ 🔻عقبنشینی مس و آلومینیوم در بورس لندن/ نیکل و سرب در مسیر صعود 🔹️به گزارش فولادبان، معاملات فلزات پایه در بورس لندن در آخرین دادههای رسمی قابلتأیید تا پنجشنبه ۵ نوامبر، تصویری متفاوت از روند قیمتها ارائه میدهد. در حالی که مس، آلومینیوم و روی در قیمتهای پایانی سهماهه چهارم نوامبر با افت همراه شدند، نیکل و سرب در همین بازه افزایش قیمت را ثبت کردند. 🔹️بر اساس دادههای پایانی بورس ل…
🔻کپسول خبری نفت ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ نفت در تقابل دو نیروی متضاد/ بازگشت نگرانیهای امنیتی در خلیج فارس همزمان با افزایش برآورد مازاد عرضه 🔹 نفت برنت ICE بهای قرارداد آتی ژانویه ۲۰۲۷ برنت، به ۹۶٫۳۷ دلار برای هر بشکه رسید؛ ۱٫۷۵ دلار معادل ۱٫۸۵ درصد بالاتر از تسویه روز قبل. نمایشگر رسمی ICE در ساعت ۰۹:۰۷ همان روز نرخ ۹۴٫۲۵ دلار را ثبت کرده بود. 🔹 نفت خام آمریکا WTI قرارداد آتی نفت خام وستتگزاس اینترمدیت در بازار NYMEX به …
Sticker, posted without a caption
گزارش فولادبان از معاملات «پشت خطی»؛ 🔻 دلار هزار و ۳۰ تومان بیشتر از لیر ارزان شد/ کاهش سکه در بازار آزاد 🔺 به گزارش خبرنگار فولادبان، تا ساعت ۱۷:۰۰ پنجشنبه ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ نسبت به صبح امروز: 🔹 دلار آزاد از ۲۶۷,۷۰۰ تومان با کاهش ۱,۰۵۰ تومانی به ۲۶۶,۶۵۰ تومان رسید. 🔹 لیر ترکیه از ۵,۴۳۰ تومان با کاهش ۲۰ تومانی به ۵,۴۱۰ تومان رسید. 🔹 روبل روسیه ۳,۲۶۰ تومان اعلام شد؛ داده مقایسهای قبلی در دسترس نیست. 🔹 یوان چین از ۴۰,۲۴۰…
🔻 کپسول خبری دولت ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ دستور مدیریت مصرف انرژی برای حمایت از تولید/ مصوبه جدید دولت برای مقابله با تخلفات بازار 🔹 پزشکیان: کارگروههای استانی مدیریت مصرف انرژی تشکیل شوند مسعود پزشکیان، رئیسجمهور، دستور تشکیل کارگروههای استانی مدیریت مصرف انرژی را صادر کرد و بر تدوین نقشه راه و جلوگیری از توقف فعالیت واحدهای تولیدی تأکید کرد. 🔹 پزشکیان موافقت با تأسیس صندوق توسعه عدالت آموزشی را ابلاغ کرد مسعود پزشکیان، …
Showing the 12 most recent of 599 posts we hold for @fouladban. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fouladban edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 10 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@fouladban named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 30 August 2026 – 30 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@arz_tala_ir1 · 28,707
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فولادبان (Fouladban)” (@fouladban), 11,035 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fouladban.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.