Posted without readable text

Channel
Founder Lab
@founder_lab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003620022851 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @founder_lab |
| Description | Kanalda biznes va iqtisodiyot to'g'risida foydali ma'lumotlar ulashib boriladi. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 17 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/founder_lab |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 31 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:47 | 31 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 156.1%
- avg views ÷ 31 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 48.4
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 6.09%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 April 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 629 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Sept 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 13
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 5 | 45.5% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 27.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 27.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
❤2
📺 Gollivud qanday qilib millionlab dollarlik xatolardan saboq chiqarmoqda? Kino olami shunchaki ijod emas, balki milliardlab dollarlik ulkan biznes hisoblanadi. So'nggi tahlillar shuni ko'rsatmoqdaki, zamonaviy bozor qoidalarini tushunish har qanday soha tadbirkorlari va marketologlari uchun muhim ahamiyatga ega. 1️⃣ Yoshlar hali ham jonli tajribani qadrlaydi Smartfon va ijtimoiy tarmoqlar davrida yoshlar (Gen Z va…
🛑 TikTok Algoritmining Qorong'i Tomoni: Metrikalar inson hayotidan ustunmi? Raqamli marketingda platformaning "yopishqoqligi" (foydalanuvchini qanchalik o'zida ushlab tura olishi) va kunlik faol foydalanuvchilar (DAU (Daily Active Users)) soni o'sishning eng muhim ko'rsatkichlari hisoblanadi. Biroq, yaqinda fosh bo'lgan maxfiy korporativ hujjatlar ijtimoiy tarmoqlar o'z auditoriyasini ushlab turish uchun qanday xavf…
❤1🔥1
📈 Biznesda "ideal" bo'lish trenddan qoldimi? "Bloomberg" jurnalining bir nashrida jurnalist Amanda Mull qiziq bir haqiqatni yuzaga olib chiqqan. Unga ko'ra "Vinerlardan tortib to Sun'iy Intellektgacha bo'lgan madaniyat hamma narsani haddan tashqari mukammallashtirib yubordi. Endi odamlar o'z kamchiliklarini ko'rsatishni boshlaydilar". Raqamli marketing (Digital Marketing) va SMM olamida hozir hamma narsa benuqson:…
🔥2👍1
😃 Nima uchun Xitoyning mikrochip sanoati aynan bugunga kelib "portlash" qildi? Tarixda muvaffaqiyatga erishgan barcha yirik chip zavodlari ikkita asosiy omil birlashgandagina yutib chiqqan ekanlar. Ulardan biri, davlatning kuchli yordami: Aniq maqsadli davlat dasturi va yaxshi moliyaviy ko'mak. Ikkinchisi esa, katta va ishonchli xaridor: Mahsulotni tinmay, katta hajmda sotib oladigan kamida bitta yirik korporativ m…
$1 lik mahsulotdan $5 milliardlik imperiyagacha: E.L.F. Beauty strategiyasi Bu inson — Tarang Amin, hozirgi kunda kosmetika olamidagi eng qaynoq brendlardan biri hisoblangan e.l.f. Beauty kompaniyasining bosh direktori. Kompaniyaning bozorga kirib kelish va o'sish yo'li juda qiziqarli keys hisoblanadi: *️⃣Boshlanish nuqtasi: E.L.F. (Eyes, Lips, Face) 20 yil oldin bozorga mutlaqo kutilmagan taklif bilan kirib keldi…
Korxonada AI ishlayotgani ishchilarning rolini kamaytirmasligi kerak AI kuchaygani sari insonning eng muhim vazifasi — qaror qabul qilish bo‘lib qoladi. Shuning uchun, AI ma’lumotni tez qayta ishlay olsada, biznesdagi ko‘plab qarorlar faqat ma’lumotga bog‘liq emas. Balki faqatgina inson bajara oladigan, tajriba + mas’uliyat + insoniy omil + to'g'ri qaror qabul qilish kerak bo'ladi. Masalan, AI sizga 5 ta strategik…
AI sababli aqliy charchoq — shunchaki xodimning shaxsiy muammosi emas, bu biznesga ham salbiy ta'sir ko'rsatishi mumkin. Agar xodim doimiy ravishda AI vositalari bilan ishlasa, uning miyasi faqat vazifani bajarish bilan band bo‘lmasdan quyidagilar bilan ham band bo'ladi: AI natijalarni tekshiradi, AI xatolarini tuzatadi, qaysi javobdan foydalanishni tanlaydi, bir nechta variantni solishtiradi, texnologiyaga moslash…
AI ishimizni tezlashtiryapti. Ammo nega ba’zan undan foydalangandan keyin o'zimizni yanada charchaganday his qilamiz? So'nggi paytda AI rivojlanib, ko‘plab vazifalarni osnlashtirishni boshladi: matn yozadi, ma’lumot izlaydi, tahlil qiladi, g‘oya beradi. Lekin, AI natijasini tekshirish, tahrirlash, to‘g‘rilash va undan to‘g‘ri xulosa chiqarish haligacha bizni qo'limizda. Natijada yangi turdagi yuklamalar paydo bo‘ly…
AI ishimizni kamaytiryaptimi? Balki aksinchadir. Ko‘pchiligimiz AI haqida shunday tasavvurga egamiz: AI ko‘proq ishni avtomatlashtiradi, biz esa kamroq ishlaymiz. Ammo Harvard Business Review’dagi tadqiqot buning aksini ko‘rsatadigan qiziq holatni ochib beradi. AI ishni kamaytirmasligi, aksincha, uni yanada intensivlashtirishi mumkin. AI yordamida biror vazifa tezroq bajarilganda, tejalgan vaqt ko‘pincha dam olishg…
"Ishonchli rahbar" tuzog'i: Hamma narsani hal qilish nega xavfli? Kompaniyadagi qiyin vaziyatlarda jamoaning barcha yukini o'z bo'yniga oladigan va har bir kichik muammoni hal qiluvchi menejerlar tashkilot xaloskoridek tuyulishi mumkin. Ammo bu yondashuv uzoq muddatda katta zarar keltiradi: 1. Muammolar ildizi yashirinib qoladi Rahbar hamma joyda "emotsional bufer" yoki vositachi bo'laversa, tizimli xatolar va xodi…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @founder_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Founder Lab” (@founder_lab), 31 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/founder_lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.