Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 4 Word Film Review

Channel

4 Word Film Review

@fourword

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,664subscribers

-147 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001132892046
TypeChannel
Username@fourword
Created15 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fourword

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,66413,81113,737.56 August 2026 — 13,811 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,808 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,804 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,805 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,802 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,798 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,791 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,789 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,787 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,780 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,777 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,773 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,771 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,769 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,762 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,761 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,756 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,752 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,745 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,738 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,733 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,731 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,727 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,721 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,717 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,710 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,698 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,681 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,664 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 35 days, net -147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,642–13,833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 05:3613,664-17
6 Sept 2026, 23:3813,681-17
4 Sept 2026, 05:5913,698-12
2 Sept 2026, 20:1713,710-7
1 Sept 2026, 21:3313,717-4
1 Sept 2026, 00:0613,721-6
30 Aug 2026, 20:1413,727-4
29 Aug 2026, 17:2513,731-2
28 Aug 2026, 16:4213,733-5
27 Aug 2026, 17:4413,738-7
26 Aug 2026, 16:1813,745-7
25 Aug 2026, 18:3613,752-4
24 Aug 2026, 19:3313,756-5
23 Aug 2026, 06:1313,761-1
21 Aug 2026, 17:2913,762-7
20 Aug 2026, 15:0713,769-2
19 Aug 2026, 12:0713,771-2
18 Aug 2026, 14:3813,773-4
17 Aug 2026, 12:4813,777-3
16 Aug 2026, 02:1713,780first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.5%
avg views ÷ 13,664 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,800
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
21
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held48 (18 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total58,700
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«Проект У» Чтобы никто не догадался

1 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,630 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«Не по-детски» Безруков в роли Нагиева

31 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,910 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«Бегущая» Не пробегайте мимо премьеры

30 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,020 viewsread 2 September 2026

Подводим #ИтогиНедели. Согласно результатам голосования: Лучший фильм недели — «И наступит рассвет» 🔥 Худший фильм недели — «Чучело» 💩

29 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,380 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«Марсианка» Мэтт Деймон нервно курит

28 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,490 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«Код сна» Заснул во время просмотра

27 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,630 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«И наступит рассвет» Настоящий фейерверк визуального стиля

26 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,810 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«Кошмар на улице Корал Гроув» Фредди Крюгера нет, расходимся

25 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,810 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«Чучело» Лучше пересмотреть картину Быкова

24 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,980 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«Мятеж» Когда прошёл все профессии

23 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,780 viewsread 2 September 2026

Подводим #ИтогиНедели. Согласно результатам голосования: Лучший фильм недели — «Мотор Сити» 🔥 Худший фильм недели — «Пункт назначения: Мост №13» 💩

22 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,910 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«Ассистент в морге» Мексиканский «Кадавр» на минималках

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @fourword. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

английский для дебилов
@debilenglish · 61,177
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“4 Word Film Review” (@fourword), 13,664 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fourword.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.