Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +1,424. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,621–8,473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 08:39
8,259
+159
13 Sept 2026, 03:21
8,100
-3
9 Sept 2026, 10:56
8,103
+5
4 Sept 2026, 04:36
8,098
-17
31 Aug 2026, 16:03
8,115
-55
28 Aug 2026, 07:12
8,170
+4
24 Aug 2026, 22:05
8,166
+154
20 Aug 2026, 22:37
8,012
+258
17 Aug 2026, 16:48
7,754
+280
14 Aug 2026, 12:28
7,474
+86
11 Aug 2026, 04:26
7,388
+283
7 Aug 2026, 23:22
7,105
+270
7 Aug 2026, 14:16
6,835
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:09
6,835
first reading
Engagement
90 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.07%
avg views ÷ 8,259 subscribers
Avg views / post
667
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 90 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
90 (5 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
11,332
Reactions total
565
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
59s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,127 reactions across 88 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
672
21.5%
🔥
491
15.7%
❤🔥
297
9.50%
custom 5269534833326959158
175
5.60%
💘
152
4.86%
custom 5269364473449160825
128
4.09%
custom 5271841247944778873
127
4.06%
🙏
115
3.68%
🤩
113
3.61%
😭
100
3.20%
💯
84
2.69%
🤯
75
2.40%
😁
70
2.24%
😎
67
2.14%
👻
61
1.95%
😱
53
1.69%
💔
38
1.22%
🎉
33
1.06%
🤣
32
1.02%
👍
27
0.863%
24 further kinds
217
6.94%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 90 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 89 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @foxford_ege. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 90 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сегодня обещали демки ЕГЭ-2027 🙂
Как появятся (а возможно, уже совсем скоро), сразу опубликуем в канале доки и расписание разборов от наших преподов. Не пропустите ❤️
Кажется, сегодня у нас намечается очень положительная реакция 🥳
Потому что день рождения отмечает Тима Руднев — наш препод по химии!
Поздравляем, желаем побольше кайфа от работы, классных ребят на занятиях и поменьше моментов, когда органика решает устроить всем проверку на прочность))
И раз уж повод такой, без ништячка вас тоже не оставляем: ловите мега полезнятину для ОГЭ и ЕГЭ по химии от Тимы и подписывайтесь …
После 9-го необязательно идти по маршруту «10-й класс → ЕГЭ → вуз» 👀
Можно пойти в колледж и начать осваивать профессию раньше.
Если этот вариант вроде интересен, но пока вообще непонятно, как там всё устроено, — залетай в ТГ-канал ИТ-колледжа.
Там разбираемся:
➡️ какие профессии можно получить после 9-го;
➡️ как вообще устроена учёба в колледже;
➡️ можно ли начать работать ещё во время обучения;
➡️ что там с пра…
Представим, что Смешарики внезапно закончили 9 класс 😳
Кто остался бы в школе, кто ушёл в колледж, а кто ещё пару лет делал бы вид, что этот выбор его не касается?
Наша версия ⬇️
Даты выхода демоверсий ❗️
Теперь официально: ОГЭ публикуют уже сегодня, а ЕГЭ дропнут в пятницу, 28 августа.
Как только файлы появятся на ФИПИ, отправим вам всё сюда, а наши преподаватели разберут демки в прямых эфирах почти сразу после выхода 💪
Включаем режим ожидания 🙏
После такого точно надо показать, как наши преподы помогают разбираться с экзаменами...
3 БЕСПЛАТНЫХ ВЕБА ДО НАЧАЛА УЧЕБНОГО ГОДА 🤩
🔸«Итоговое собеседование: почему оно на самом деле не страшно»
🕐 26 августа в 11:00 мск
Вместе с Вероникой Авраменко, преподавателем на курсах русского языка, разберём, как проходит собеседование, что именно от тебя ждут в каждом задании и с чего начать подготовку.
🔸«ОГЭ и ЕГЭ: в чём …
Когда мы говорим, что преподы Фоксфорд Экзаменов всегда на стороне учеников, иногда представляем это примерно так:
🔥 спасаем из горящих зданий
🎧 выходим на смену в службу поддержки
И если вы думаете, что мы преувеличиваем, — смотрите эксклюзивные репортажи прямо с мест событий 😱
Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @foxford_ege. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@foxford_ege edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Фоксфорд | Онлайн-школа @foxford_edu · 36,980 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фоксфорд Экзамены” (@foxford_ege), 8,259 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foxford_ege.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
