π€©π
customΒ 54386334338468123746customΒ 54359702362957138004customΒ 52246226266006747983customΒ 52199672771888101531customΒ 54223760892782379931
Signed π½πππ π¨ππππππ πππππ

Channel
@foxvetik
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
222subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002068843974 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @foxvetik |
| Description | ΠΠ΅ΡΠ° Π² ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π»ΡΠ±ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ππ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/foxvetik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 222 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:47 | 222 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (2 September 2026 β 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 781 |
| Reactions total | 117 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 00:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 9 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
117 reactions across 7 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| customΒ 5422376089278237993 | 25 | 21.4% | |
| customΒ 5316768667445262843 | 23 | 19.7% | |
| customΒ 5224622626600674798 | 11 | 9.40% | |
| customΒ 5435970236295713800 | 11 | 9.40% | |
| customΒ 5260696821423958603 | 9 | 7.69% | |
| customΒ 5438633433846812374 | 9 | 7.69% | |
| π | 8 | 6.84% | |
| customΒ 5219788039613594609 | 7 | 5.98% | |
| customΒ 5219967277188810153 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| π | 4 | 3.42% | |
| customΒ 5433839833732628218 | 3 | 2.56% | |
| customΒ 5269437410583799084 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 1 | 0.855% | |
| π | 1 | 0.855% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
π€©π
customΒ 54386334338468123746customΒ 54359702362957138004customΒ 52246226266006747983customΒ 52199672771888101531customΒ 54223760892782379931
Signed π½πππ π¨ππππππ πππππ
ππ
customΒ 53167686674452628438π4customΒ 54223760892782379933customΒ 52246226266006747982customΒ 54359702362957138001
Signed π½πππ π¨ππππππ πππππ
ππ
customΒ 54223760892782379938customΒ 52606968214239586034π2π1customΒ 52694374105837990841
Signed π½πππ π¨ππππππ πππππ
ππ
customΒ 53167686674452628439customΒ 54359702362957138004customΒ 52199672771888101533customΒ 52606968214239586032β€βπ₯1
Signed π½πππ π¨ππππππ πππππ
π€©π
π6customΒ 54223760892782379935customΒ 52246226266006747984customΒ 53167686674452628431
Signed π½πππ π¨ππππππ πππππ
Π Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π΅ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ±ΡΡ ΡΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊ π€©βΊοΈ
customΒ 52197880396135946097customΒ 53167686674452628435customΒ 52606968214239586033customΒ 54338398337326282183
Signed π½πππ π¨ππππππ πππππ
π©Άπ€©
customΒ 54223760892782379938customΒ 54386334338468123743customΒ 52246226266006747982customΒ 54359702362957138002
Signed π½πππ π¨ππππππ πππππ
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @foxvetik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππππ²ππ’ππ‘ππ«π«π² β€οΈβπ©Ήπβ (@foxvetik), 222 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foxvetik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.