BTC wasn’t ready for a bull market 82,000 was not touched And I said it many times BTC is in a soft bull market And the next step of bull will be the breakout above $82,000

Channel
Free Dr Profit Vip New 🌹
@free_Crypto_Vip_Groups
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
277subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001876700546 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @free_Crypto_Vip_Groups |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/free_Crypto_Vip_Groups |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 277 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 274 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:45 | 270 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 268 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 268 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.2%
- avg views ÷ 277 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 44.9
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (23 August 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 718 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
This number is closer to 100k than to 60k, can you believe it ? And unfortunately the psychology of the mass will not believe it, despite its right in front of them
Sleep is for the poor Only a 9-5 engine needs sleep There is no sleep , what is sleep ?
A new chapter 😁😁😁 Remember Sunday report I said clearly if 78k is broken The 82k will happen quick 82k region - ITS KEY ! Let’s see !!!!
Ignore the Noise Trust the process #CRCL #COIN #ETH
$ETH Absolute madness on this fractal. I don’t know yet whether ETH will break above the massive $5,000 resistance, and honestly, that doesn’t even matter right now. We are still far away from $5,000, which is exactly why I accumulated so heavily around $1,900. Ethereum was simply massively undervalued. From my entry at $1,900 to $5,000 alone is already a 161% capital gain. If ETH eventually breaks above $5,000, t…
3 Winners - $1000 each You have received a DM on X Congratulations 🎆🍸
Does he still deserve the $1,000, or should we select a new winner instead?
- YES GIVE HIM56%
- NO SELECT A NEW ONE44%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
GIVEAWAY: The system selected this person as the first $1,000 winner. All he had to do was leave a review, positive or negative. Instead, he ignored the rules and complained. We clearly said your membership price stays locked and will not change only as long as you never cancel. He confirmed he cancelled for one month, so the old price is gone permanently. No $1,000 and no old membership price. Lost twice.
🟩 Active Trades 📈Spot Positions: Crypto + Stocks #CVX SPOT @166 https://t.me/c/1667240577/15530 #BTC spot purchases @54,000 - 64,000 https://t.me/c/3941982514/128 #ETH spot purchase @1845 + continued accumulation https://t.me/c/3963062248/20 #CIRCLE SPOT @65 https://t.me/c/3941982514/186 #ONDO spot purchase @0,368 https://t.me/c/3941982514/198 #COINBASE spot purchase @168 https://t.me/c/3963062248/28 #SHELL spot pu…
#SNDK short from $2000 keep going !!!
Someone BRING AN ASIAN TOY to the VITALIK QUICK !
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @free_Crypto_Vip_Groups. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Does he still deserve the $1,000, or should we select a new winner instead?
- YES GIVE HIM56%
- NO SELECT A NEW ONE44%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@drprofitsignal · 49,528
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Free Dr Profit Vip New 🌹” (@free_Crypto_Vip_Groups), 277 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/free_Crypto_Vip_Groups.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.