Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Фрейграф, но можно просто Рэй

Channel

Фрейграф, но можно просто Рэй

@freigraf_masked

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

132subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003333892533
TypeChannel
Username@freigraf_masked
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/freigraf_masked

Growth

115132123.510 August 2026 — 115 subscribers11 August 2026 — 115 subscribers18 August 2026 — 121 subscribers25 August 2026 — 131 subscribers1 September 2026 — 130 subscribers9 September 2026 — 132 subscribers10 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 112–135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 12:36132+2
1 Sept 2026, 03:07130-1
25 Aug 2026, 03:51131+10
18 Aug 2026, 21:39121+6
11 Aug 2026, 01:17115no change
10 Aug 2026, 15:31115first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3740.7%
custom 52603402790088569483336.3%
custom 525806978749750287199.89%
99.89%
🍓33.30%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
10.0%
1 of 10 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
39.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
43.0
over 9 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGJ2iH717 August 20267 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC17 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @astnosugarPhoto

🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎 Вампиры в Царицыно? Мы отправляемся на поиски 🔍 Представляем мрачную новинку серии Тёмные тропы «Хоть в гроб клади!» от Фрейграф Оллард Манн 🦇 В первом тираже приготовили целый КОМПЛЕКТ МЕРЧА в подарок: 🤩закладка с голографической ламинацией 🤩 открытка и стикерпак от хеллюга Когда обыденная жизнь среди московских панелек начинает казаться скучной, главное — не ввязываться в поиск сверхъестественного. Пото

2

10 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC33 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ну это роскошно. Надо брать

11

10 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC43 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ни о чем не жалею

4custom 52603402790088569484

10 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC43 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Оформлен предзаказ на мою же книгу

6custom 52603402790088569483

8 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC34 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @yacherdakPhoto

#книги2026 #фрейграфоллардманн #хотьвгробклади РЕЛИЗЫ РУССКОЯЗЫЧНЫХ АВТОРОВ Автор: Фрейграф Оллард Манн Книга: Хоть в гроб клади! Теги: NA, мистика Издательство: АСТ. NoSugar Дата выхода: август 2026 года Когда обыденная жизнь среди московских панелек начинает казаться скучной, главное — не ввязываться в поиск сверхъестественного. Потому что мифы о вампирах могут оказаться правдой, а сами вампиры могут обитать сов

7custom 52603402790088569484custom 52580697874975028712

7 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC72 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Цена, кстати, стала ниже

custom 526034027900885694872custom 52580697874975028712

7 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC74 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В честь этого сегодня ночной стрим

custom 526034027900885694873custom 52580697874975028712

7 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC114 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Спасибо всем за репосты, я вас обожаю

73

7 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC39 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFGJ2iH7Forwarded from @predzakazknigPhoto

#купить #читайгород #мистика ОТКРЫТ ПРЕДЗАКАЗ Фрейграф Оллард Манн «Хоть в гроб клади!» 📚 предзаказ в читай-городе Реклама. Рекламодатель ООО «Новый Книжный Центр». ОГРН 1027700282763

5🍓32

7 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC67 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

А пока вспомним саааааамое начало Первые картинки были сделаны мной ещё году в 23-м, если не 22-м, и это была игра одевалка .

custom 526034027900885694883custom 52580697874975028713

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @freigraf_masked. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фрейграф, но можно просто Рэй” (@freigraf_masked), 132 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freigraf_masked.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.