Channel
@froggy_draw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
210subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001754498514 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @froggy_draw |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/froggy_draw |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 210 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 211 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 210 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 209 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 207 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 207 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
301 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 198 | 65.8% | |
| 👏 | 32 | 10.6% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 7.97% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 4.65% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 3.32% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 2.33% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 2.33% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 1.33% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.997% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 0.664% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Немного стадиков рук. Надоело, что я не могу быстро наскетчить кисти и на набросках персонажей предплечья заканчиваются бесформенными линиями. Раньше искала референсы в пинтресте, кисти в целом получались, но были какими-то странными. Сейчас я поняла, что это из-за того, что на фотках объём очень сложно понять. Теперь сижу рисую у зеркала. Намного проще и быстрее, потому что когда не понимаешь, что за тень на руке - …
❤12
Я ии ребята 😔 (На самом деле мы все ии, живём в симуляции, ждём когда разрабы баги пофиксят)
❤16😢7
попытки рисовать пейзажи с натуры даются тяжело #стадик #скетч
❤13
Аыаыаыа пасиба всем за поздравления! Мне прям радостно стало :3
❤12
Немного похвастаюс своими не рисовательными успехами XD Сегодня получила диплом и он к моему удивлению оказался красным (выяснилось, что в нём может быть определённый процент четвёрок) А ещё пришли результаты ЕГЭ. Я СДАЛА БИОЛОГИЮ НА 81 БАЛЛ!!! Ну и потихонечку пытаюсь стать качком :)
👏22❤14
ура челлендж окупился, я выиграла микропланшетик на канале @huion_russia аыаыааыаыаыыа ура 🤩
❤11🎉4👍4
#стадик #скетч
❤26🔥9💘5
весёлые челленджи продолжаются
❤13👍4🤯3💘1
Немного пропала, диплом делала :) Вот такая лампа получается
❤23👍6
Остановлюсь ли я? Вряд ли фишка этой игры в том, что у меня куплены только цвета, которые на скрине (ну ещё плюс чёрненый) поэтому приходится их смешивать с помощью прозрачности. Это интересно :3 #скетч
❤23🔥5🤮1
это не лечится #скетч
❤18❤🔥8🔥8
во мне снова проснулась тяга к рисованию в приложениях, которые для рисования подходят ОЧЕНЬ плохо XD #скетч
❤17👏10❤🔥2🔥2💘1🤮1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @froggy_draw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Жабка рисует” (@froggy_draw), 210 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/froggy_draw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.