Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FUCK RUGS Portal

Channel

FUCK RUGS Portal

@frugsolana

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

757subscribers

+89 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002212055272
TypeChannel
Username@frugsolana
Created10 August 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 September 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/frugsolana

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6507607057 August 2026 — 668 subscribers14 August 2026 — 657 subscribers21 August 2026 — 650 subscribers29 August 2026 — 742 subscribers6 September 2026 — 760 subscribers7 September 2026 — 760 subscribers13 September 2026 — 757 subscribers7577 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 634–777 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 22:40757-3
7 Sept 2026, 08:23760no change
6 Sept 2026, 20:37760+18
29 Aug 2026, 09:56742+92
21 Aug 2026, 15:48650-7
14 Aug 2026, 15:57657-11
7 Aug 2026, 14:35668first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 10 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
108.5%
avg views ÷ 757 subscribers
Avg views / post
821
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 3 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held3 (10 August 202427 August 2026)
Views total821
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 08:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Jan 2026, 16:44 UTC≈3,870 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Welcome to $FRUG (fuck rugs) The frog that said fuck rugs and meant it. Ca: EBnA9HbJkhRTP1n1ZCkZzNCGjLssRWTetBFL9nzPpump Born August 2024 by Frog Artist Big Frugowski, FRUG wasn’t just launched… it was forged in the fire of every rug pull the meme world has ever seen. We refuse to die. We refuse to fade. It refuse to get rugged into oblivion. Every time the market tried to bury it, FRUG stood back up, dusted its

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @frugsolana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FUCK RUGS Portal” (@frugsolana), 757 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frugsolana.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.