
Channel
ππ§π π’ πππππππ‘ππ π£ππ¦π¦ππ₯
@ftmochallengepassers
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
7,621subscribers
+6,552 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002131784818 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ftmochallengepassers |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ftmochallengepassers |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 7,621 | -115 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 7,736 | -251 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 7,987 | -216 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 8,203 | -952 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 9,155 | -1,531 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 10,686 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 10,686 | +9,748 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 938 | -38 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 976 | -49 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 1,025 | -44 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 1,069 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured β we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@instantfundingio Β· 32,645
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 72 here β alongside 71 others β read 4 September 2026
@FaferoDaeiat Β· 50,887
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 75 here β alongside 74 others β read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ§π π’ πππππππ‘ππ π£ππ¦π¦ππ₯β (@ftmochallengepassers), 7,621 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ftmochallengepassers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.