Channel
@fugaf1sh1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003815609894 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fugaf1sh1 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 20 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fugaf1sh1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 51 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 50 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 49 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 48 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 48 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 20 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 31 | 43.1% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 30.6% | |
| 💋 | 19 | 26.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Не лолитный образ, но я наконец-то нашла силы примерить новый кардиган от BTSSB. В последнее время на улице жарко, так что выгулять этот образ нет возможности (кардиганчик намного теплее чем выглядит) 🌟🌟🌟🌟 Давно хотела что нибудь с такими карточными узорами
💋14❤9💘4
Сегодня с Тилли ненадолго забыли про зачетную неделю и просто готовили парфе с клубникой 🍓 (На фото самое красивое, что смогли сделать. А остальные….главное что вкусные!) А еще мы вдохновились старым видео от deerstalker pictures, где девчата играют в cards against lolitas и сделали себе дополненную версию со своими приколами 💕
❤6💘4💋1
Успела устроить фотосессию у сакуры, получилось очень мило! 🟤🟤🟤 Отдельная благодарность Тилли, за то, что была моим фотографом 💕 Фотосессия была совмещенная с другими ребятками, в общей сложности мы провели на улице ~8 часов, утомились, но остались довольны
💘9💋4❤1
Кем я себя чувствую, когда выкладываю в тик ток видео с фильтром:
❤6
Кэжуал коорд с юбкой, которую я сшила на прошлых выходных 🍰 Давно хотела себе простую белую юбку, но я боялась покупать что-то дорогое, потому что мне было бы жалко запачкать. Так что за небольшие деньги я купила себе хлопковых материалов и сшила сама. Второй раз в жизни шила юбку, мне нравится как получилось!
💘5
Первый релиз в Долхаусе проходит на ура, было очень волнительно (особенно собирать и отправлять заказы по нужным адресам), надеюсь дела и дальше будут идти в гору!
💘4
Примерила новый парик и хэндмейд заколку со звездами. Давно хотела заколку такого типа, но не могла найти✨ Заказала себе тканей, хочу попробовать сшить юбочку на выходных
💘5
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @fugaf1sh1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FugaF1sh вещает” (@fugaf1sh1), 51 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fugaf1sh1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.