Channel
@fundacja_Tutaka
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
608subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001158250576 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fundacja_Tutaka |
| Created | 1 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fundacja_Tutaka |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 608 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 610 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 613 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 619 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 620 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 623 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 623 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
59 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 33.9% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 20.3% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 18.6% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 16.9% | |
| custom 5341498088408234504 | 3 | 5.08% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| custom 5274099962655816924 | 1 | 1.69% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Энтузіясты распрацавалі захапляльную гульню-хадзілку “Дарога да Новай Беларусі” з нагоды Канферэнцыі “Новая Беларусь”. Пра беларускія праблемы звычайна пішуць доўга і сумна. Тут наадварот, трэба правесці героя да Новай Беларусі праз перашкоды, у якіх кожны пазнае нешта сваё. Гуляеш проста ў тэлефоне, без усталёўкі. Згуляць можна па спасылцы.
👎2
Як гучыць Беларусь, у якой хочацца жыць? Прадстаўніцтва па нацыянальным адраджэнні збірае песні Новай Беларусі — плэйліст пра тое, якой беларусы бачаць сваю краіну. Кожны і кожная могуць прапанаваць адну кампазіцыю, у якой для яго ці яе гучыць Новая Беларусь, і расказаць чаму. З сабранага зробім агульны плэйліст і выкладзем у Spotify для агульнага карыстання. А таксама гэтыя трэкі прагучаць падчас Канферэнцыі Новая …
📢 9 жніўня а 17:00 запрашаем на мітынг-канцэрт да Дня Годнасці Шэсць гадоў таму, 9 жніўня 2020 года, беларусы зрабілі выбар на карысць свабоды, праўды і годнасці. Мільёны людзей выйшлі на вуліцы сваіх гарадоў, каб абараніць права на сумленныя выбары і будучыню сваёй краіны. У адказ яны сутыкнуліся з гвалтам, рэпрэсіямі і пераследам. Але памяць пра тыя падзеі жыве. Жыве і наша вера ў Беларусь — свабодную, дэмакратыч…
❤6🔥2
Хто яшчэ не выказаўся? - Не саромейцеся! 🙂 Мы працягваем збіраць водгукі пра TUTAKA 2026. Калі пасля фестывалю ў вас засталіся думкі, заўвагі або прапановы, падзяліцеся імі! Раскажыце, што б вам хацелася захаваць, а што варта было б пераасэнсаваць ці змяніць. ⏪Вашы адказы дапамогуць зразумець, што сапраўды важна для ўдзельнікаў фестывалю і на што трэба звярнуць асаблівую ўвагу падчас падрыхтоўкі яго наступнай эдыцы…
🔥3custom 53414980884082345043👎2custom 52740999626558169241
Барык пакрысе пусцее, але 👉ў гэтым відэа👈 ён яшчэ поўны музыкі, танцаў, размоў і ўсмешак✨ Мы ўсё яшчэ на паляне, прыбіраем тэрыторыю, разбіраем рэчы і памалу раскладаем па палічках усё, што адбылося за гэтыя дні. Ведаем, што TUTAKA 2026 пакінула вельмі розныя ўражанні. Мы чуем цёплыя словы, бачым крытыку і разумеем, што частка сітуацый патрабуе сур’ёзнага аналізу. 💬 Пакуль эмоцыі не астылі, раскажыце, якім для вас б…
❤3🔥3👏1
🌲 На Барыку - трэці дзень фестывалю Tutaka. Здаецца, першыя два праляцелі хутчэй, чым мы паспелі гэта ўсвядоміць. Таму на хвіліну спыняемся і вяртаемся да момантаў, якія ўжо - частка гісторыі фэсту. Шукайце сябе на фота і дзяліцеся сваімі! 🖥 Яшчэ больш здымкаў тутака. 📷 Руслан Серадзюк
❤8👎3👏1🔥1
🦬 Тым часам партнёрам Фестывалю Tutaka стала Падляшскае ваяводства. Цэнім давер і цешымся, што разам можам ствараць гэтую прастору сустрэч і міжкультурнага дыялогу. 🔴Партнёры Фестывалю: Падляшскае ваяводства, Горад Беласток Дзякуем за падтрымку!
👍10👎4❤3🔥3
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @fundacja_Tutaka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fundacja Tutaka” (@fundacja_Tutaka), 608 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fundacja_Tutaka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.