As an investor, these are the actions I find worth tracking. Not just when a company sells more of what it already knows. But when it notices where the consumer is heading and gets there early. The interesting businesses are often hiding in plain sight. Sometimes, they start with something as ordinary as a packet of chips

Channel
Fundamental Analysis (Long term)
@fundamental3
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
44,961subscribers
-221 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001182732697 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fundamental3 |
| Description | https://t.me/+Rn8RmYm0XMZTagXs I'm not a SEBI registered advisor,the information provided by me is for educational purposes only.You are responsible for all investment decisions,plz note that I dont provide any tips/stock suggestion. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fundamental3 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 44,961 | -21 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 44,982 | -13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 44,995 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 45,003 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 45,014 | -25 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 45,039 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 45,050 | +58 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 44,992 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 44,994 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 45,004 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 45,010 | -24 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 45,034 | -15 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 45,049 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 45,060 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 45,058 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 45,054 | -14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 45,068 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 45,074 | +6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 45,068 | -11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 45,079 | first reading |
Engagement
371 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.98%
- avg views ÷ 44,961 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,240
- 291 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.186%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 291
- of 371 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 232 of 291 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 371 (4 August 2026 – 11 September 2026) |
| Views total | 652,083 |
| Reactions total | 1,029 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Sept 2026, 12:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,950
- Videos
- ≈1
- Links
- ≈87
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,177 reactions across 259 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 883 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 191 | 16.2% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 3.06% | |
| 👎 | 15 | 1.27% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 0.935% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 0.68% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 0.68% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 0.595% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 0.51% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.425% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 0.34% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.17% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.085% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 293 of the 371 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 371 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Those are the questions that matter. If the answer to those questions is yes, this could become much more than another product in Parag's portfolio. It could become a high-frequency consumer business sitting on top of two powerful trends: protein and snacking. They have been been to scale the new age businesses of whey protein and Pride of Cows, so that gives some confidence.
That is why I am watching what Parag does with Avvatar Masala Chips. Protein chips in familiar flavours. 10g protein in a 30g pack. No - added sugar, palm oil or preservatives. On paper, it checks a lot of boxes. But I'm not convinced yet. Because launching a product is easy. Getting someone to buy it again is the real test. Will it taste good? Will people find the price reasonable? Will it be available eve…
Then quick commerce entered the picture. Blinkit. Zepto. Faster discovery. Easier trial. And, importantly, repeat orders. The company went from being a small Shark Tank pitch to a business valued at much higher levels. Reports have put its valuation above ₹1,100 crore, while Aman Gupta's early investment has been reported to have grown from around ₹12 lakh to roughly ₹40 crore. The exact numbers are less important…
People snack frequently. And when they find something they like, they don't buy it once. They come back for it. This reminds me of Let’s Try Foods. When the brand appeared on Shark Tank India in 2021, it looked like a small namkeen company entering a market already dominated by names like Haldiram’s. Ashneer Grover questioned whether it could really compete. But Let’s Try had one simple difference. It used 100% …
Protein is no longer something only fitness enthusiasts talk about. It is slowly becoming part of everyone's food. Your daily meals. Your office snack. Your child's lunchbox. Your 4 PM craving. That’s where this gets interesting. Milk and ghee are huge categories for Parag. But snacking has something different going for it.
Sometimes, the most interesting moves by a company are the ones that don't look very important at first. Parag Milk Foods launching Avvatar Protein Masala Chips is one such move that caught my attention. At first glance, it’s just a new snack. But look at the larger picture. India is snacking more, while at the same time people are becoming more conscious about what they eat.
PARAG MILK 12 Lakhs snack bet that became 40 Crores with ₹1,100 Crores revenues in 4 years. Now Parag Milk is betting on a similar snack opportunity. Here is why I think this could be one of the Balaji Wafers moments in healthy snacking category
GE Shipping’s capital allocation offers a great lesson in counter-cyclical investing. During the shipping downcycle, the Company expanded its fleet from 32 vessels in FY16 to 48 vessels in FY18. Then, when the cycle improved and cash flows surged, it did not blindly chase growth at elevated asset prices. Instead, it used the upcycle to deleverage, bringing borrowings down from ₹6,213 Cr in FY18 to ₹1,087 Cr in FY2…
KALYANI CAST TECH | FROM CONTAINER MANUFACTURING TO INTEGRATED LOGISTICS Kalyani Cast Tech is no longer trying to remain just a container manufacturer. Three recent developments show where the business wants to go next. 👉 ICD + LOGISTICS EXPANSION CBIC has approved the company’s proposal to establish an Inland Container Depot (ICD) at Shivlakha, Kutch. The company will also inaugurate its Gati Shakti Cargo Termi…
❤2
GE POWER INDIA LTD. | THE FORGOTTEN POWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SITTING INSIDE INDIA’S ELECTRICITY SUPERCYCLE 👉 India's power story is usually told through: → Generation capacity → Transmission → Renewables → BESS → Data centres 👉 But there is another layer that gets less attention: The equipment required to keep India's existing and new power plants running. That is where GE Power India becomes interesting. 👉 The …
❤5🔥1
NRB BEARINGS | FROM “JUST ANOTHER AUTO ANCILLARY” TO A POTENTIAL PRECISION-ENGINEERING STORY? NRB Bearings is a 1965-founded Indian manufacturer of precision friction solutions. Its core products include needle roller bearings, cylindrical roller bearings, tapered/spherical bearings, thrust bearings and precision components such as planetary shafts, crank pins, kingpins and cages. The company has 3,000+ designs, w…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 371 posts we hold for @fundamental3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Brokerage_report · 23,2535 postsSTOCK MARKET UPDATES 📈
@stockupdate9 · 48,1205 postsCONCALLS
@Concalls3 · 10,1324 postsIPO INFORMATION
@ipoinfo3 · 9,9532 postsStock market Stats
@stockinfo333 · 18,9532 postsStock SIP For LONG TERM
@stocksip · 21,4812 postsNEW STOCK SIP
@New_Stocksip · 2,5751 postDaily Quotes
@Qoutes90 · 4,2881 postUS STOCKS / CRYPTO
@Us_stock3 · 6,1421 postWealthcreator
@wealthcreator7 · 40,6791 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@stocksresult · 20,890#1
@Concalls3 · 10,132#2
@stockupdate9 · 48,120#3
@wealthcreator7 · 40,679#4
@Brokerage_report · 23,253#5
@stockinfo333 · 18,953#6
@researchreportss · 65,281#7
@Stock_aaj_or_kal · 19,439#8
@ipoportal · 8,216#9
@longterm9 · 21,554#10
@multibaggers_valuepicks · 41,876#11
@niveyshak1 · 31,622#12
@Equity_Insights · 17,680#13
@shorterm1 · 30,525#14
@DalalStreetSaga · 16,042#15
@Investorresultanalysis · 9,840#16
@kuttrapali26 · 91,997#17
@chartopia · 3,602#18
@MoneyTimes · 16,209#19
@themarketoutlook · 12,961#20
@vluxeinvests · 4,944#21
@ndtvprofitnews · 48,390#22
@cnbc_tv18 · 77,895#23
@stockinsights01 · 6,718#24
@thespiritualtraderofficial · 27,018#25
@indianeconomyandmarket · 5,953#26
@livemint · 113,465#27
@BooksMakeIndiaRead · 17,393#28
@joinfingrad · 24,442#29
@shortterm07 · 57,404#30
@bsindiaofficial · 79,643#31
@super_swing · 7,023#32
@STOCKSPIRIT · 2#33
@stoxtrainer · 7,145#34
@AiNSIDERNEWS · 10,911#35
@marketswizard · 12,733#36
@multibagger_stocks_ideas · 7,136#37
@FinanceWithSunil · 93,016#38
@DSIJ_Telegram · 11,608#39
@tradeflowma · 10,351#40
@beinglimittless · 12,514#41
@Sivafundamentals · 3,238#42
@stockmarketlover · 2,858#43
@FTUchart · 11,404#44
@stockpro_online · 268,638#45
@Invest_better · 2,214#46
@stockedgeapp · 28,733#47
@smartinvest_25 · 18,092#48
@zerodhain · 54,012#49
@shauryavarshneyofficial · 6,782#50
@motilaloswalofficial · 200,923#51
@TheStockMarketIntelligence · 11,025#52
@HinduBusinessLine · 17,808#53
@Chartstelleverything · 9,703#54
@AceinkOfficial · 146,541#55
@eagleyeNetwork · 9,635#56
@Techno_charts · 30,290#57
@daytradertelugu · 381,949#58
@Niftycalls1709 · 1,927#59
@ipoinfo3 · 9,953#60
@stocksip · 21,481#61
@Us_stock3 · 6,142#62
@btsreports · 21,155#63
@BeatTheStreetnews · 26,705#64
@eagleeyesmarketanalysis · 38,215#65
@book4research · 7,548#66
@chartbank · 65,047#67
@Equity_By_Research · 7,928#68
@Qoutes90 · 4,288#69
@moneycontrolcom · 237,601#70
@equity99 · 101,809#71
@ChartsParadise506 · 18,062#72
@bank_nbfc_fintech · 4,616#73
@Share_marketinfomania · 24,402#74
@hiddenmultibaggerstocks_Devendra · 9,926#75
@bankniftylearn2 · 5,379#76
@marketresearchreports · 4,790#77
@MeghUpdates · 79,580#78
@trendkarts · 11,576#79
@InsidersInsightGold · 3,665#80
@Chartshala · 6,117#81
@market_moverss · 9,972#82
@bloomberg · 172,715#83
@Darkhorseofstockmarket · 44,713#84
@uremo24 · 13,946#85
@winnersgame · 935#86
@moneypurseadv · 285,232#87
@NKsingh100 · 67,914#88
@OfficialSharekhan · 8,880#89
@inved_research · 33,611#90
@cityequityresearch · 12,387#91
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@stockupdate9 · 48,120
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
@multibaggers_valuepicks · 41,876
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
@raghavsvi · 28,202
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
@TechnoFunda_Investing · 52,897
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@TheFinancialExpressOnline · 45,684
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
@ndtvprofitnews · 48,390
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
@zerodhain · 54,012
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
@researchreportss · 65,281
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
@AceinkOfficial · 146,541
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@bsindiaofficial · 79,643
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
@wealthcreator7 · 40,679
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
@equity99 · 101,809
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
@ipo_ji · 27,718
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
@DKTECHNICALS · 28,074
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
@stockedgeapp · 28,733
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@kuttrapali26 · 91,997
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
@shorterm1 · 30,525
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
@ipo_premium · 40,115
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 August 2026
@CARachanaRanade · 99,967
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@livemint · 113,465
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
@OfficialHDFCsecurities · 62,630
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
@cnbc_tv18 · 77,895
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
@abhishekkarofficial · 81,615
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
@shortterm07 · 57,404
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 51 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fundamental Analysis (Long term)” (@fundamental3), 44,961 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fundamental3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.