Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FUNNY ANIMALS 🙈

Channel

FUNNY ANIMALS 🙈

@funnny_animals

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,166subscribers

-1,043 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001555710621
TypeChannel
Username@funnny_animals
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/funnny_animals

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,09318,20917,65128 August 2026 — 18,209 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,209 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,172 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,179 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,132 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,177 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,153 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,013 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,893 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,648 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,287 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,093 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,152 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,166 subscribers17,16628 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 20 days, net -1,043. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,926–18,376 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:1917,166+14
15 Sept 2026, 13:5617,152+59
14 Sept 2026, 00:4017,093-194
12 Sept 2026, 05:5917,287-361
10 Sept 2026, 03:3717,648-245
6 Sept 2026, 22:3717,893-120
4 Sept 2026, 07:5718,013-140
2 Sept 2026, 17:2318,153-24
1 Sept 2026, 13:1318,177+45
31 Aug 2026, 10:1318,132-47
30 Aug 2026, 11:4518,179+7
29 Aug 2026, 08:3618,172-37
28 Aug 2026, 10:5318,209no change
28 Aug 2026, 09:3018,209first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 25 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.62%
avg views ÷ 17,166 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,650
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 56 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held56 (25 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total92,498
Reactions total7,264
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 29s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 55 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,264 reactions across 53 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,70737.3%
💯2,28031.4%
🤔2,24130.9%
😁200.275%
🤣70.096%
50.069%
🥰40.055%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 07:35 UTC462 views100 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Cute meows😻 #animals #humor Follow us ⬇️ FUNNY ANIMALS😎

🤔42💯30🔥28

3 Sept 2026, 05:45 UTC969 views100 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

No one will notice😉 #animals #humor Follow us ⬇️ FUNNY ANIMALS😎

🤔54💯38🔥8

3 Sept 2026, 00:15 UTC≈1,340 views101 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

The real team🐶 #animals #humor Follow us ⬇️ FUNNY ANIMALS😎

🔥57🤔23💯21

2 Sept 2026, 21:35 UTC≈1,350 views100 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

How easy it is to scare a cat🤣 #animals #humor Follow us ⬇️ FUNNY ANIMALS😎

🔥47💯28🤔25

2 Sept 2026, 21:25 UTC≈1,350 views100 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

They switched places🤣 #animals #humor Follow us ⬇️ FUNNY ANIMALS😎

🤔38🔥35💯27

2 Sept 2026, 09:45 UTC904 views70 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

And how do they do that?😂 #animals #humor Follow us ⬇️ FUNNY ANIMALS😎

💯28🤔23🔥18🤣1

2 Sept 2026, 07:35 UTC902 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Out of office😎 #animals #humor Follow us ⬇️ FUNNY ANIMALS😎

💯31🤔28🔥10🥰2

2 Sept 2026, 05:55 UTC902 views70 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

And let the whole world wait...🐱 #animals #humor Follow us ⬇️ FUNNY ANIMALS😎

🔥29🤔24💯16🤣1

2 Sept 2026, 00:15 UTC≈1,250 views209 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

A loyal friend🐶 #animals #humor Follow us ⬇️ FUNNY ANIMALS😎

🔥92🤔79💯371

1 Sept 2026, 21:35 UTC≈1,420 views209 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

The Nimble cat🐈 #animals #humor Follow us ⬇️ FUNNY ANIMALS😎

💯79🤔67🔥61😁2

1 Sept 2026, 21:25 UTC≈1,490 views269 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

It's not so easy to wake up in the morning🥱 #animals #humor Follow us ⬇️ FUNNY ANIMALS😎

💯102🔥94🤔72😁1

1 Sept 2026, 09:25 UTC922 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

The work is so exhausting😅 #animals #humor Follow us ⬇️ FUNNY ANIMALS😎

🔥42🤔15💯13🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @funnny_animals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UPPCS UPSSSC UPPSC UPTET RO ARO
@UPPCS_UPSSSC_UPPSC_UPTET_RO_ARO · 118,390
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FUNNY ANIMALS 🙈” (@funnny_animals), 17,166 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/funnny_animals.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.