Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Múltiplas Seguras🎯

Channel

Múltiplas Seguras🎯

@futebolparainvestidores

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

26,635subscribers

+1,068 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001324766293
TypeChannel
Username@futebolparainvestidores
Description📊Análise do dia disponível no canal🎯Foco em Combinação (Odd Baixa) 👇Acesse minhas análises completas no canal. Compartilhe o Grupo⤵️ https://t.me/futebolparainvestidores
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/futebolparainvestidores

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,45726,63926,0487 August 2026 — 25,567 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,567 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,554 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,534 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,538 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,564 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,566 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,559 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,569 subscribers15 August 2026 — 25,457 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,492 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,545 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,682 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,699 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,721 subscribers22 August 2026 — 25,725 subscribers24 August 2026 — 25,789 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,851 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,875 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,921 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,960 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,984 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,003 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,033 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,078 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,077 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,084 subscribers6 September 2026 — 26,091 subscribers9 September 2026 — 26,276 subscribers11 September 2026 — 26,325 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,415 subscribers15 September 2026 — 26,586 subscribers17 September 2026 — 26,639 subscribers19 September 2026 — 26,536 subscribers26 September 2026 — 26,635 subscribers26,6357 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +1,068. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,280–26,816 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 11:2026,635+99
19 Sept 2026, 13:3926,536-103
17 Sept 2026, 00:5926,639+53
15 Sept 2026, 04:0126,586+171
13 Sept 2026, 15:1726,415+90
11 Sept 2026, 18:3626,325+49
9 Sept 2026, 09:4126,276+185
6 Sept 2026, 01:1526,091+7
3 Sept 2026, 18:4226,084+7
2 Sept 2026, 09:5826,077-1
1 Sept 2026, 10:0326,078+45
31 Aug 2026, 10:0426,033+30
30 Aug 2026, 08:2426,003+19
29 Aug 2026, 11:5725,984+24
28 Aug 2026, 08:3825,960+39
27 Aug 2026, 05:4225,921+46
26 Aug 2026, 02:3225,875+24
25 Aug 2026, 05:1825,851+62
24 Aug 2026, 04:3725,789+64
22 Aug 2026, 15:1725,725first reading

Engagement

174 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.77%
avg views ÷ 26,635 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,800
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 174 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held174 (3 August 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total83,001
Reactions total3,875
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Oct 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,780
Videos
≈653
Links
≈4,890

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 13m
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

15,375 reactions across 158 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,25521.2%
❤3,18820.7%
🔥3,02319.7%
😍2,96019.3%
🏆2,94919.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 160 of the 174 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 16:26 UTC≈1,200 views128 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

Governo está certo. Só ele ganha.

  1. Sim. Está certo mesmo.15%
  2. Totalmente errado. Não concordo.86%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍38🔥29😍24❤19🏆18

Signed Marcelo Marks

1 Oct 2026, 16:25 UTC≈1,190 views94 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Esse governo não joga pra perder. Pra gente é ruim. Pra eles é bom.

😍25🔥21❤20🏆14👍14

Signed Marcelo Marks

30 Sept 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,830 views121 reactionsread 2 October 2026

⚠⚠⚠ ⤴️⤴️⤴️.

❤29🏆25😍24🔥22👍21

Signed Marcelo Marks

30 Sept 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,510 views137 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥38👍31❤27😍23🏆18

Signed Marcelo Marks

30 Sept 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,480 views132 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥40❤28😍25👍21🏆18

Signed Marcelo Marks

30 Sept 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,430 views131 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😍32👍26🏆25🔥25❤23

Signed Marcelo Marks

30 Sept 2026, 15:44 UTC≈1,610 views133 reactionsread 2 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤32🔥30👍27🏆22😍22

Signed Marcelo Marks

29 Sept 2026, 23:36 UTC≈1,940 views150 reactionsread 2 October 2026

Nosso último bilhete no vip executado. Já pagando muito bem. O último de muitos que virão. Em breve estaremos de volta. Só acabar as eleições patrão.

❤42👍35🏆27🔥23😍23

Signed Marcelo Marks

29 Sept 2026, 23:35 UTC≈1,810 views125 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍44😍25❤21🔥19🏆16

Signed Marcelo Marks

29 Sept 2026, 19:16 UTC≈2,080 views122 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Video

Saquei ⤴️💵 Precisei sacar patrão. Saquei com 69. Mas me segue na outra conta que em breve voltaremos aqui, porque isso não será votado e vai caducar, pode ter certeza. ⤵️⤵️⤵️ https://www.instagram.com/thepatraoo?stkn=NHd4OXRsZWdvcWdy

🔥38😍27👍21🏆20❤16

Signed Marcelo Marks

26 Sept 2026, 12:56 UTC≈3,490 views182 reactionsread 2 October 2026

📢 PATRÕES, VAMOS ENTENDER O QUE ESTÁ ACONTECENDO. A MP que proíbe as bets foi publicada e já está valendo, mas a discussão política e jurídica não terminou aqui. Por ser uma Medida Provisória, o texto ainda passa pelo Congresso. Além disso, existe um setor inteiro que investiu pesado para operar dentro das regras criadas pelo próprio Estado. Só de outorga, foram R$ 30 milhões por autorização, com validade prevista…

❤63👍47🏆30🔥23😍19

Signed Marcelo Marks

25 Sept 2026, 14:06 UTC≈3,270 views115 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Video

➡️Mais de 💵R$ 3 mil de lucro em apenas 3 dias. ODD baixa e Múltiplas Seguras🔒 fizeram com que ele chegasse a esses resultados.💵 Mas isso não aconteceu por acaso.⤵️⤵️⤵️ CLIQUE E VEJA TUDO AQUI ⚠️Vip? domingo às 09hs, o que é caro vai te custar barato, de r$797 POR SURPRESA 🎁. Só no Grupo da Condição Especial.⤵️ https://t.me/+dNCK5UWWs0ZlNTgx

🏆38😍25🔥22❤18👍12

Signed Marcelo Marks

Showing the 12 most recent of 174 posts we hold for @futebolparainvestidores. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@futebolparainvestidores edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
7 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Oct 2026, 16:26 UTCAnonymous Poll275 voters

Governo está certo. Só ele ganha.

  1. Sim. Está certo mesmo.15%
  2. Totalmente errado. Não concordo.86%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTCAnonymous Poll126 voters

Como entrou no Grupo Grátis do Telegram? ⤵️

  1. PELO INSTAGRAM 📱60%
  2. PELO YOUTUBE 📱41%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTCAnonymous Poll233 voters

Selecione o melhor mercado para os jogos de hoje⤵️

  1. Fluminense+232%
  2. Vasco+333%
  3. Menos 2.5 Gols Chape49%
  4. Palmeiras+244%
  5. Mirassol+344%

The shares total 202%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Múltiplas Seguras🎯” (@futebolparainvestidores), 26,635 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/futebolparainvestidores.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.