Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EMIR FUTURES EMPIRE

Channel

EMIR FUTURES EMPIRE

@futures_empire

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

41,381subscribers

+588 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002264738008
TypeChannel
Username@futures_empire
DescriptionAbout effective interaction with the market Knowledge -> patience -> perseverance persistence -> profit. Daily futures trading with my personal strategy. Contact me - @emirfutures
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/futures_empire

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

39,86541,54140,7037 August 2026 — 40,793 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,787 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,735 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,661 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,571 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,509 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,449 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,387 subscribers14 August 2026 — 40,284 subscribers15 August 2026 — 40,177 subscribers17 August 2026 — 40,037 subscribers18 August 2026 — 39,932 subscribers19 August 2026 — 39,865 subscribers20 August 2026 — 39,904 subscribers21 August 2026 — 39,881 subscribers22 August 2026 — 40,039 subscribers24 August 2026 — 40,088 subscribers25 August 2026 — 40,094 subscribers26 August 2026 — 40,065 subscribers27 August 2026 — 40,042 subscribers28 August 2026 — 40,108 subscribers29 August 2026 — 40,128 subscribers30 August 2026 — 40,116 subscribers31 August 2026 — 40,125 subscribers1 September 2026 — 40,067 subscribers2 September 2026 — 40,062 subscribers3 September 2026 — 40,243 subscribers5 September 2026 — 40,325 subscribers9 September 2026 — 40,947 subscribers11 September 2026 — 41,541 subscribers13 September 2026 — 41,433 subscribers15 September 2026 — 41,439 subscribers17 September 2026 — 41,442 subscribers19 September 2026 — 41,381 subscribers41,3817 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +588. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,614–41,792 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:1641,381-61
17 Sept 2026, 00:1741,442+3
15 Sept 2026, 02:2141,439+6
13 Sept 2026, 13:5741,433-108
11 Sept 2026, 16:1741,541+594
9 Sept 2026, 02:0040,947+622
5 Sept 2026, 20:3840,325+82
3 Sept 2026, 19:4240,243+181
2 Sept 2026, 14:2340,062-5
1 Sept 2026, 14:0540,067-58
31 Aug 2026, 12:1840,125+9
30 Aug 2026, 14:0740,116-12
29 Aug 2026, 15:0740,128+20
28 Aug 2026, 14:5240,108+66
27 Aug 2026, 14:1340,042-23
26 Aug 2026, 13:0340,065-29
25 Aug 2026, 10:3440,094+6
24 Aug 2026, 13:3540,088+49
22 Aug 2026, 19:2740,039+158
21 Aug 2026, 08:5739,881first reading

Engagement

619 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.23%
avg views ÷ 41,381 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,410
380 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.494%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
380
of 619 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held619 (5 August 202622 September 2026)
Views total1,294,050
Reactions total6,396
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 15:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,580
Videos
347
Links
2,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26m 59s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11,441 reactions across 617 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,34955.5%
🔥2,72323.8%
👍8217.18%
🤩4263.72%
❤‍🔥2972.60%
🐳2512.19%
🥰1801.57%
👏1080.944%
🎉790.69%
🏆700.612%
🤝330.288%
🫡290.253%
250.219%
🆒110.096%
💯110.096%
😎80.07%
60.052%
🤗50.044%
😍40.035%
😘30.026%
1 further kind20.017%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 618 of the 619 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,441 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 619 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 15:13 UTC510 views5 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🤑🔼Just 1 trade that will change your life! Indicators show strong oversold and this is the best opportunity to go long (don't hesitate, this is a signal for hundreds of % profit) 📈 Double your deposit? Easy 📩 Email me and pick up this juicy trade - @emirfutures

2🎉2🔥1

22 Sept 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,710 views13 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video

Weekly market review. 💻 00:12 Ethereum (ETH) 💰 00:34 Chainlink (LINK) 💰 00:54 Avalanche (AVAX) 💰 01:14 Hyperliquid (HYPE) 💰 💬 @emirfutures

8🔥5

22 Sept 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,780 views13 reactionsread 22 September 2026

📈 I've put together a market overview for you, in which I'll analyze the charts for ETH, LINK, AVAX and HYPE. 💬 @emirfutures

6👍6🔥1

22 Sept 2026, 13:16 UTC≈2,030 views13 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Nearly $800 million in short positions were liquidated over the past 24 hours 😭 We’re finally seeing the scenario we’ve been waiting for for years. The total market capitalization rose by about 6% over the past 24 hours. Just last week, the market faced several negative catalysts at once —the Fed and the CLARITY Act. But there was no major sell-off; the market had already priced in most of the negative news. Now t

8❤‍🔥2👍2🔥1

22 Sept 2026, 11:11 UTC≈2,240 views11 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

📈 Santiment: BTC FOMO has reached its highest level since 2024. One-sided optimism is where caution comes in handy. Open interest rose 7.6% to ~$156 billion, even despite ~$800 million in short liquidations over the past 24 hours, suggesting that traders are replacing liquidated positions with new leverage rather than scaling back their expectations. 💬 emirfutures

👍5🔥42

22 Sept 2026, 10:01 UTC≈2,390 views12 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🔥 The difference between a trader who grows and a trader who loses? The first one follows a system. The second one follows emotions. ❌ Fear says: “Close now.” ❌ Greed says: “Risk more.” ❌ Panic says: “Enter before it’s too late.” Emir removes the chaos and gives you a prepared plan 📊 💎 Entry 💎 Targets 💎 Protection 💎 Full guidance You don’t buy access to another useless channel. You participate in a real trade and

6🔥6

22 Sept 2026, 09:03 UTC≈2,360 views19 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🪙 The BCH price reacted to the 4-hour FVG zone and began an upward move. The profit on the long position was 357%. 💬 emirfutures

🔥107🤩2

22 Sept 2026, 08:09 UTC≈2,460 views17 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Hello whales! 🐳 Market Overview - September 22. Bitcoin (BTC) is trading above $85,000, up +4.40% overnight. Ethereum (ETH) is trading above $2,700, up +2.40% overnight. Market Summary: BTC - $85,478 (+4.40%) ETH - $2,729 (+2.40%) XRP - $1.519 (+5.30%) BNB - $786.14 (+2.10%) SOL - $116.38 (+3.40%) 🐂 Top Gainers: Akedo (AKE) +42.20% 🐻 Biggest Loss: MemeCore (M) -13.90% ✍️ Key Points: The price of Bitcoin (BTC)

10🔥5🥰2

21 Sept 2026, 20:55 UTC≈3,340 views30 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

💰 Ethereum (ETH) on the CME. The price of ETH is well on its way to consolidating above the gap zone between $2,400 and $2,640. If the price consolidates above this zone, it will not only confirm a breakout from the overall downtrend but also eliminate this resistance level. This will give the price the potential to continue its upward movement, with the first targets for growth being the liquidity levels at previou

23👍7

21 Sept 2026, 20:28 UTC≈3,150 views21 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

📍 Clear entry 📍 Controlled risk 📍 Defined targets 📍 Guidance during the movement 📍 Calm exit No upfront fees 💳❌ You trade first and split only after profit 💵🤝 Stop fighting the market alone. ✉️ Write @emirfutures

🔥117🎉3

21 Sept 2026, 19:06 UTC≈3,030 views17 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

💻 What happened last week. 🗺 Key events: - Important business and meetings. 💼 - Turkey. 🇹🇷 - My clients results. 💰 - Topkapı. 😍 - $860,000 in PNL from trades featured in the market review. 🪙 - New trading practice. 💻 - Monday = a fresh start for the week. 🐂 Trading results: LONG XLM +$133,200 LONG ENA +55% SHORT DASH +436% SHORT ADA +$93,100 SHORT FIL +384% LONG DASH +668% LONG HYPE +$209,200 LONG ADA +138,400 SHORT

👍12🥰5

Showing the 12 most recent of 619 posts we hold for @futures_empire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTCAnonymous Poll169 voters

🪙What's coming first for $SOL?

  1. 11041%
  2. 9060%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 619 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EMIR FUTURES EMPIRE” (@futures_empire), 41,381 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/futures_empire.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.