Channel
@fyrchelo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
436subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002110909729 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fyrchelo |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fyrchelo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 436 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 434 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 430 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 432 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 433 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 433 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
124 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5325891014773185493 | 44 | 35.5% | |
| custom 5325880328894554534 | 43 | 34.7% | |
| custom 5327995432784110041 | 21 | 16.9% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 4.84% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 3.23% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 3.23% | |
| custom 5327831017141051807 | 2 | 1.61% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fyrchelo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Раз пошла такая гулянка, то дополнительно ещё упомяну следующую находку. Она вполне может быть полезна для снимающих транспорт в Москве. Для меня это не особо актуально, но вот есть канал для отслеживания уникального (в какой-то степени) транспорта по борт.номерам. Может кому-то понадобится: https://t.me/BortNumber
👍4
Вот это нифига себе... 😦😳
custom 532799543278411004121custom 53258910147731854937
Тем временем в Краснопресненское депо на мойку приехал автобус 🧐
custom 532588032889455453427🤡6👀4
В мае 2024 года как раз бывал в Нижнем. Так что почему бы и не попробовать. Ну и куда ж без лисьей аватарки 🤪
custom 532589101477318549320
🥰 Не могу с вами не поделиться) Пока кто-то много говорит и сомневается, тем временем транспортные энтузиасты из Нижнего Новгорода создали свой сайт, посвещённый наземному электротранспорту города. Это действительно что-то новенькое за долгое время. Сайт не является альтернативой или очередным продолжением идеи всеми известного Трансфото. Он имеет свою цель и философию, которые отличаются от синего аналога. Лично …
custom 532589101477318549317
Монорельс «Стрела» — ликвидирован Ещё в начале июля пришла информация, что, спустя 3 года после решения о сносе, приступили к демонтажу испытательной линии. Сделать это пытались ещё в 2024 году, организовав тендер на снос, на который, кстати, так никто не заявился. В итоге взялись лишь только сейчас, видимо, за счёт собственных усилий. На момент 10-го июля уже был демонтирован поворот на восточной части. А 23-го июл…
custom 532588032889455453416custom 53278310171410518072
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @fyrchelo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фырчело 🦊” (@fyrchelo), 436 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fyrchelo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.