Posted without readable text
🔥10😁4❤🔥2👍2❤1😍1

Channel
@gacrus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,275subscribers
+86 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001629542377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gacrus |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gacrus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 20,275 | -45 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 20,320 | -437 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:35 | 20,757 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:25 | 20,758 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 20,756 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 20,774 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 20,785 | -774 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 21,559 | +17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 21,542 | +212 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 21,330 | +116 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 21,214 | -154 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 21,368 | -28 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 21,396 | +188 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 21,208 | +180 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 21,028 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 21,040 | -294 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 21,334 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 21,335 | -21 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 21,356 | +824 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 20,532 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (14 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 31,717 |
| Reactions total | 536 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 18:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
979 reactions across 40 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 334 | 34.1% | |
| ❤ | 194 | 19.8% | |
| 🔥 | 155 | 15.8% | |
| 😍 | 80 | 8.17% | |
| 👏 | 69 | 7.05% | |
| ❤🔥 | 62 | 6.33% | |
| 😁 | 42 | 4.29% | |
| ⚡ | 15 | 1.53% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 0.919% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 0.715% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.511% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 0.204% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.204% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.204% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.102% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 979 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
🔥10😁4❤🔥2👍2❤1😍1
Нашли отражение цветов GAC GS8 (Джи Эс 8) в природе 😍 Один дизайн, но три абсолютно разных характера. Какой ближе вам? Владельцы, присылайте фото своих авто в комментарии! Узнаем, какого цвета больше 📸 А если еще не определились — записывайтесь на тест-драйв.
😍9🔥3❤2❤🔥1😁1
...истории GAC 🎓 Единственный предмет в расписании, который точно не захочется прогуливать. Мы уже открываем секретные архивы и готовим для вас кое-что по-настоящему легендарное. Дождитесь звонка, ведь этот учебный год мы начнем максимально громко 😉
👏7❤4😍3👍2❤🔥1💯1
🚀 Следующий герой истории GAC умеет превращать дорогу в пространство для жизни. В 2017 году GAC по-новому взглянул на премиальные минивэны, и так появился M8 (Эм 8). Задача была не просто создать автомобиль для деловых поездок, а сделать пространство, которое одинаково подходит для встреч, семейных маршрутов и путешествий. С каждым поколением минивэн становился технологичнее и комфортнее. Сегодня внутри есть всё дл…
👏6😍4👍3🔥1
Тот случай, когда мир реально крутится вокруг тебя… когда ты на новом GAC S9 (Эс 9) 🤩 Пейзажи меняются, а этот кроссовер сохраняет главное качество — уверенность. С интеллектуальной системой полного привода любая дорога, даже горный серпантин, подстраивается под ваши правила. Почувствовать себя в центре движения можно на тест-драйве.
👍6❤4❤🔥2💯2🔥1😍1
Чтобы попасть в легендарную игру, нужно быть легендой 🎮 Новый GAC Hyptec HT (Хайптек Эйч-Ти), похоже, прошел кастинг еще до анонса. Теперь самое время проверить, каково это, быть за рулем 😉
👍7😍6❤5🔥3⚡1🤗1😁1
Эстафету легенд GAC принимает кроссовер GS4 (Джи Эс 4) 🚀 Если GS8 (Джи Эс 8) сразу заявил о себе как флагман, то GS4 (Джи Эс 4) выбрал другой путь — постепенно завоевывать доверие миллионов. Модель появилась в 2015 году, а уже через 41 месяц ее продажи достигли 1 млн автомобилей. С каждым поколением этот кроссовер становился технологичнее и собрал целую коллекцию признаний: №1 по качеству по версии J.D. Power, лиде…
👍9🔥5❤3😍2⚡1❤🔥1👏1
Что это за «маленькая жизнь», которую все проживают летом? 😄 Наверное, она прячется в случайных маршрутах и моментах, когда эстетика GAC S9 (Эс 9) идеально вписывается в каждый ваш пейзаж. Рассмотреть модель во всех деталях 👈
❤🔥7❤5😍3🔥2👍1💯1
Posted without readable text
🔥7😍5❤🔥4❤3👍1👏1😁1
🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁 🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁 🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁 Открываем историю легенд GAC с кроссовера GS8 (Джи Эс 8) 🌏 В 2016 году бренд выпустил свой первый большой SUV на 7 мест. Модель сразу стала заметной: в первый же год она взяла Diamond Award за дизайн и была признана «Внедорожником года» среди национальных брендов. С тех пор GS8 заметно изменился. Он успел сменить поколения, а его суммарные продажи достигли 438 000 автомобилей к июл…
👍29🔥10❤🔥7❤3👏3😍3⚡1
Как вам такой «супергеройский» апгрейд оптики? Делаем? 😎 У нового GAC S9 (Эс 9) интерактивные задние фонари: их дизайн можно менять прямо через мультимедийную систему, выбирая один из представленных вариантов. Ведь у каждого героя должна быть своя узнаваемая фишка. Больше о технологиях модели на нашем сайте 👈
🔥20👍9❤6🥰3😨2⚡1❤🔥1👏1
У каждой большой истории есть точка отсчета 🚀 29 лет назад компания GAC Group только начинала свой путь. В этом июле мы пробили отметку в 30 миллионов выпущенных авто. Это результат, который превратил амбициозную идею в мировую легенду. Предлагаем заглянуть в архив GAC и стать частью истории, которая стоит за этой цифрой. Готовы? Скоро расскажем всё самое интересное! 🌏
❤16👏6👍5😍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @gacrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GAC Россия” (@gacrus), 20,275 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gacrus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.