Channel
@gafar96
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
81subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004296593730 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gafar96 |
| Created | 19 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gafar96 |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 81 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 82 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 81 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 81 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
144 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 70 | 48.6% | |
| ❤ | 50 | 34.7% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 4.86% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 4.17% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 3.47% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.39% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.39% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.694% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.694% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👀🎙СВЕРШИЛОСЬ! Я долго к этому шел и наконец то пришел😁 5 лет безрезультатных обещаний, куча постоянных переделываний и самокритики. Но по итогу ЦЕРБЕР ГОТОВ! Говорю сразу это только начало, дальше будем двигаться уже быстрее и стабильнее, а через несколько месяцев когда я вернусь с задачи, мы ебанем этот альбом в массу с охватом более миллиона человек, я более чем уверен что свой слушатель найдется. Спасибо моему …
🔥7❤3👍3🎉2
Всем привет, нахожусь сейчас на боевой задаче, буду до ноября где то на передке, потом в отпуск. А теперь по альбому, да я знаю что запоздал. Долгое время мы ждали пока он пройдет модерацию, чтобы выйти на все площадках. По итогу все четко, но Яндекс Музыка мозги чуть ебет щас, но пару дней +- и все будет. По сути осталось дождаться яндекс музыку и всё. Ждите большой пост с моим коментарием к релизу в ближайшие дни …
❤18👏3🔥3🤗1
Channel photo updated
Posted without readable text
🔥6🎉4
Слушаю Цербера сейчас. Блять. Ну альбом готов так то (почти) Завтра послезавтра будут последние 2 трека и можно выкладывать. Но не все так сразу😁 после того как он будет у меня мы переходим ко второму этапу, а именно к дропу на площадки и возможным тизерам и прогревам. А может и нет, выпустим сразу. После чего спустя время (месяц два) мы вкладываем все в рекламу, абсолютно везде, начиная с тиктока заканчивая ютубом, …
🔥12❤3👏2
Посмотрел фильм "Обсессия", ужастик 2026 года, вышел в конце весны, при бюджете в 1 млн долларов фильм собрал почти пол миллиарда. И заслуженно. Очень понравился. Я как фанат старых ужастиков очень люблю этот жанр. Я вырос на таких фильмах как "Кошмар на улице Вязов", "Звонок", "Пятница 13" и тому подобное, и как любитель хорроров я не мог не заметить что давно хороших ужастиков не снимают. Последние действительно жу…
❤5👍2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤13😁2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥16❤6🤣2
Промо к альбому. (Выход возможен раньше заявленного)🤞🤞 Больше такого делать?
🔥10👍2
Video, posted without a caption
🔥8❤2🏆1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥8
Всем привет. Это мой личный канал, отсюда все начнется. Все музло будет тут
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @gafar96. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GAFAR” (@gafar96), 81 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gafar96.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.