Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Галецкая

Channel

Галецкая

@galetskayareal

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,853subscribers

+329 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001343058933
TypeChannel
Username@galetskayareal
Created16 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/galetskayareal

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,52413,87313,698.57 August 2026 — 13,524 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,524 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,600 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,620 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,625 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,628 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,637 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,639 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,638 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,634 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,630 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,629 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,622 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,616 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,621 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,617 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,610 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,607 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,604 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,625 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,664 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,668 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,669 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,679 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,674 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,667 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,656 subscribers7 September 2026 — 13,646 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,853 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,854 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,872 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,873 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,853 subscribers13,8537 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +329. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,472–13,925 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 05:5913,853-20
16 Sept 2026, 02:0213,873+1
14 Sept 2026, 06:1913,872+18
12 Sept 2026, 12:1913,854+1
10 Sept 2026, 08:2013,853+207
7 Sept 2026, 01:3613,646-10
4 Sept 2026, 10:4113,656-11
2 Sept 2026, 20:4313,667-7
1 Sept 2026, 17:1413,674-5
31 Aug 2026, 16:2513,679+10
30 Aug 2026, 14:4813,669+1
29 Aug 2026, 16:3913,668+4
28 Aug 2026, 20:0513,664+39
27 Aug 2026, 17:0713,625+21
26 Aug 2026, 17:0413,604-3
25 Aug 2026, 16:4313,607-3
24 Aug 2026, 15:5613,610-7
23 Aug 2026, 00:0913,617-4
21 Aug 2026, 10:5313,621+5
20 Aug 2026, 11:0313,616first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 13,853 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held46 (22 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total24,087
Reactions total1,447
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,233 reactions across 46 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,11450.0%
😁2,06925.1%
🔥6968.45%
👍4054.92%
😱3374.09%
💔3043.69%
😢2342.84%
🤩370.449%
🎉360.437%
👎10.012%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,233 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:09 UTC947 views37 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @galetskayatoystore

Ага, таки случилось: первый адвент календарь уже в продаже. Первым появился календарь для пар от Lovehoney: внутри есть вумик и прищепка от We-Vibe, оба в лимитированном винном цвете (лайк). Еще внутри есть елочная игрушка в виде вумика 🙂 Ну и всякое разное, что там обычно кладут: массажные штуки, вибропуля, на которую можно надеть разные насадки и тем самым превратить в девайс для G или кролика, косметос, средства

26🔥11

1 Sept 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,900 views267 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Наш самолет в отпуск завтра, Пауль уже успел потерять и снова найти свой id. По ощущениям, летим мы вчетвером: Пауль, Саша, я и мой сердечный приступ.

😁192😱3830😢7

1 Sept 2026, 08:01 UTC≈2,210 views132 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Больше 7 лет назад мне диагностировали рекуррентное депрессивное расстройство. Уже будучи в ремиссии я начала анализировать свою прошлую жизнь и поняла, что всегда! всегда жила и дышала короткими отрывками между тяжелыми и темными, как колодезная вода, депрессивными эпизодами. Помимо депрессии, в моей жизни всегда была тревога. Я научилась замечать ее обострения: возвращаются тики, простые ситуации вроде небольшого

119👍12🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC≈2,380 views168 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Услышала, как американский проктолог говорит «without a base - without a trace» в контексте анальных девайсов, сижу, хихикаю и пытаюсь переложить это на русский язык. P.S. Или вот например одна стендаперша очень круто сказала «tears are the wettest he have ever made you, so what’s the drama», сильно вдохновилась этим выражением, но на русский красиво перевести так и не смогла.

92😁64🔥12

31 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈2,260 views82 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Давно у нас с вами обзоров на новые девайсы не было, исправляюсь! Вот например Zalo Deya: судя по данным из аналитики, девайс этот достаточно часто ищут в интернете, но при этом он не на слуху, как котик от Svakom. Все потому, что девайс очевидно не для новичков. Он для тех, кому хочется экспериментов, чего-то необычного, но чтобы не пришлось покупать миллион разных игрушек. Это “комбайн” 5 в 1: Стимулятор G Вакуу

63👍19

29 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC≈2,360 views116 reactionsread 2 September 2026

⁨Лена, здравствуйте! Спасибо за ваш труд и за ваши блоги, читаю уже много лет и извлекаю неоценимую пользу 🧡 Вопрос про беременность. Наверняка у вас уже были целые статьи на эту тему, но я их пропустила, т.к. было не актуально, а сейчас стало актуально 🙃 У меня сейчас 10 недель беременности, мы с мужем ведем обычную сексуальную жизнь. Вопрос такой: есть ли какие-то техники / позы или существует ли на рынке девайсо

👍5850🔥8

28 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈2,720 views176 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

AI таки пришел за вашими жопами, но не так, как вы думали. А я на всякий случай напомню: девайсы для анального проникновения должны иметь стопор. Хороший и бюджетный стимулятор простаты делает Lola Games, брать тут.

😁135😱356

27 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈3,100 views185 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

И я кажется на этот фестиваль ходила

😁16124

26 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC≈3,190 views174 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ура, друзья мои! Я наконец это сделала! Вам больше нет необходимости вопрошать «я не знаю с чего начать» и «помогите выбрать первую игрушку». Потому что вся необходимая вам информация находится в моем гиде May the Toys Be With You. Открываете, нажимаете на лупу поиска, забиваете ключевое слово, например «низкаячувствительность». Вуаля, файл покажет вам варианты девайсов для низкой чувствительности. Содержание то

118🔥56

26 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC≈3,020 views110 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Пока я тут как не в себя доверстываю мой гид по игрушкам, давайте вот о чем. Как многие из вас знают, в конце этого года на свет должны выйти два моих продукта: анальная пробка и менструальная чаша. Все в коллаборации с брендом Lola Games. Так вот пранк зашел уже достаточно далеко, и на данный момент нам нужны названия для подлинейки и для продуктов. Генерация идей никогда не была проблемой для меня, но тут задача

78🔥32

24 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC≈2,940 views234 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @ModnayazhelezaPhoto

Сумка женщины как тип её сексуальности.

😁163🔥5710🤩4

24 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈3,090 views150 reactionsread 2 September 2026

24 августа, друзья мои Поставщики дропнули первые адвент календари. Я тем временем вернулась из поездки и планирую на этой неделе закончить гид по девайсам. Stay tuned.

125👍19😁6

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @galetskayareal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Галецкая” (@galetskayareal), 13,853 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/galetskayareal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.