Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GAPiRING

Channel

GAPiRING

@gapiring_uz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

19,424subscribers

-4,154 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001834785783
TypeChannel
Username@gapiring_uz
DescriptionIjtimoiy-siyosiy tok-shou 📆 “Gapiring” tok-shousi ⏰ Dushanbadan-jumagacha 13:20 da
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gapiring_uz

Growth

19,42423,57821,5016 August 2026 — 23,578 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,578 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,552 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,277 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,074 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,876 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,722 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,552 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,395 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,197 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,945 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,732 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,560 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,386 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,228 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,083 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,896 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,679 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,495 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,361 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,227 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,063 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,955 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,844 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,738 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,642 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,535 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,424 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 27 days, net -4,154. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,801–24,201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 08:4719,424-111
1 Sept 2026, 11:0719,535-107
31 Aug 2026, 10:3819,642-96
30 Aug 2026, 11:1819,738-106
29 Aug 2026, 10:2519,844-111
28 Aug 2026, 08:5319,955-108
27 Aug 2026, 10:5520,063-164
26 Aug 2026, 10:0520,227-134
25 Aug 2026, 09:3220,361-134
24 Aug 2026, 09:4620,495-184
22 Aug 2026, 19:4420,679-217
21 Aug 2026, 11:3820,896-187
20 Aug 2026, 13:2421,083-145
19 Aug 2026, 12:3621,228-158
18 Aug 2026, 13:3521,386-174
17 Aug 2026, 13:2521,560-172
16 Aug 2026, 07:0821,732-213
14 Aug 2026, 19:5321,945-252
13 Aug 2026, 11:3522,197-198
12 Aug 2026, 12:2422,395first reading

Engagement

157 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.59%
avg views ÷ 19,424 subscribers
Avg views / post
892
151 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.158%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
151
of 157 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 151 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held157 (3 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total134,674
Reactions total83
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
276
Videos
1,570
Links
1,390

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 48m
Average length
1m 38s

Measured directly from 103 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

81 reactions across 38 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2834.6%
🔥2227.2%
👍911.1%
😁67.41%
🥰44.94%
22.47%
❤‍🔥22.47%
💯22.47%
🤝22.47%
🤩22.47%
🙏11.23%
🤣11.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 157 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 157 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTC5 viewsread 2 September 2026
Poll

1. So‘nggi 1–2 yil ichida biznes yuritishda byurokratik to‘siqlar kamayganini sezdingizmi?

  1. Ha, sezilarli darajada0%
  2. Qisman0%
  3. Deyarli o‘zgarmadi0%
  4. Aksincha, ko‘paydi0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:04 UTC13 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«Biznesga byurokratiyasiz muhit» — tadbirkorlar uchun so‘rovnoma Ovoz bering va fikringizni bildiring!⬇️⬇️

2 Sept 2026, 12:45 UTC290 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

🟢 “Gapiring” tok-shousini 🗓 02-sentabr kuni soat 20:00 da 📺 @my5tv da yoki 📹 YOUTUBE kanalimizda tomosha qiling! Bizga obuna bo'ling: 😎Telegram 😎 Instagram 📱YouTube 😎 Facebook

29 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC≈2,130 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

125 mingga yaqin talabaning ijara xonadonlariga ehtiyoji bor 📹 YOUTUBE kanalimizda tomosha qiling!

👍2

29 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

Ta’lim va texnologiya: raqamli kelajakka tayyormizmi? Bizga obuna bo'ling: 😎Telegram 😎 Instagram 📱YouTube 😎 Facebook

28 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC467 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Topolmaysiz ovvora bo'lmang) #trend

😁6🤣1

28 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC485 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1

28 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC552 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

125 mingga yaqin talabaning ijara xonadonlariga ehtiyoji bor 🟢 “Gapiring” tok-shousini 🗓 28-avgust kuni soat 20:00 da 📺 @my5tv da yoki 📹 YOUTUBE kanalimizda tomosha qiling! Bizga obuna bo'ling: 😎Telegram 😎 Instagram 📱YouTube 😎 Facebook

27 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈2,580 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ta’lim va texnologiya: raqamli kelajakka tayyormizmi? 📹 YOUTUBE kanalimizda tomosha qiling!

1

27 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC369 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

"O'ziga ishongan sudyaning mustaqilligi uning koridordan kirib kelishidan ham bilinadi" 📹 YOUTUBE kanalimizda tomosha qiling! Bizga obuna bo'ling: 😎Telegram 😎 Instagram 📱YouTube 😎 Facebook

27 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC296 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

Hududlararo sudlarni tashkil etishga qanday zarurat bor? 📹 YOUTUBE kanalimizda tomosha qiling! Bizga obuna bo'ling: 😎Telegram 😎 Instagram 📱YouTube 😎 Facebook

27 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC255 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

"Arizadagi kichik xato endi fuqaroga ortiqcha ovoragarchilik tug'dirmoqda" 📹 YOUTUBE kanalimizda tomosha qiling! Bizga obuna bo'ling: 😎Telegram 😎 Instagram 📱YouTube 😎 Facebook

Showing the 12 most recent of 157 posts we hold for @gapiring_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@gapiring_uz edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTCAnonymous Poll0 voters

1. So‘nggi 1–2 yil ichida biznes yuritishda byurokratik to‘siqlar kamayganini sezdingizmi?

  1. Ha, sezilarli darajada0%
  2. Qisman0%
  3. Deyarli o‘zgarmadi0%
  4. Aksincha, ko‘paydi0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

💊 Elektron retsept siz uchun qulaymi?

  1. Ha, qulay36%
  2. Qiyinchilik tug‘diryapti27%
  3. Hali foydalanib ko‘rmaganman36%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

💊 Sizningcha, elektron retsept antibiotiklarni o‘zboshimchalik bilan qabul qilishni kamaytiradimi?

  1. Ha24%
  2. Qisman41%
  3. Yo‘q35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

💊 Siz antibiotikni shifokor tavsiyasisiz sotib olganmisiz?

  1. Ha, olganman65%
  2. Yo‘q, olmaganman29%
  3. Javob berishni istamayman6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

💊 Elektron retsept tizimiga munosabatingiz qanday?

  1. Qo‘llab-quvvatlayman44%
  2. Qarshiman, oddiy retsept qulayroq31%
  3. Hali fikrim yo‘q25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 157 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 21,829 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GAPiRING” (@gapiring_uz), 19,424 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gapiring_uz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.