Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Garden

Channel

Crypto Garden

@garden_btc

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

999,302subscribers

-8,445 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001203058142
TypeChannel
Username@garden_btc
Description🏡 Your daily garden for trending crypto news and market insights. Stay ahead, let's grow crypto knowledge together! 🥇 Best Crypto Community 2025 by CoinGape 👉 Promo proposals: @ad_crypto ❗️ Our X account: https://x.com/btc_garden
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/garden_btc

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

967,9921,019,304993,6487 August 2026 — 1,007,747 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,007,747 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,005,233 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,002,642 subscribers10 August 2026 — 990,576 subscribers11 August 2026 — 987,018 subscribers12 August 2026 — 981,791 subscribers13 August 2026 — 974,262 subscribers14 August 2026 — 967,992 subscribers16 August 2026 — 988,606 subscribers17 August 2026 — 991,513 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,003,568 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,001,129 subscribers20 August 2026 — 995,612 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,007,110 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,007,641 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,002,399 subscribers26 August 2026 — 997,289 subscribers27 August 2026 — 994,436 subscribers28 August 2026 — 991,359 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,003,332 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,000,043 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,007,348 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,004,963 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,002,588 subscribers3 September 2026 — 999,987 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,019,304 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,015,324 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,011,721 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,009,715 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,004,677 subscribers17 September 2026 — 999,302 subscribers999,3027 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net -8,445. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 960,295–1,027,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 08:17999,302-5,375
15 Sept 2026, 05:381,004,677-5,038
13 Sept 2026, 13:021,009,715-2,006
11 Sept 2026, 19:191,011,721-3,603
9 Sept 2026, 07:191,015,324-3,980
5 Sept 2026, 20:391,019,304+19,317
3 Sept 2026, 18:21999,987-2,601
2 Sept 2026, 07:481,002,588-2,375
1 Sept 2026, 06:361,004,963-2,385
31 Aug 2026, 05:431,007,348+7,305
30 Aug 2026, 04:461,000,043-3,289
29 Aug 2026, 01:491,003,332+11,973
28 Aug 2026, 01:08991,359-3,077
27 Aug 2026, 03:26994,436-2,853
26 Aug 2026, 02:24997,289-5,110
25 Aug 2026, 03:381,002,399-5,242
23 Aug 2026, 21:161,007,641+531
22 Aug 2026, 04:061,007,110+11,498
20 Aug 2026, 23:03995,612-5,517
19 Aug 2026, 21:141,001,129first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 999,302 subscribers
Avg views / post
105,000
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held31 (6 July 202620 September 2026)
Views total732,600
Reactions total21,716
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
269
Videos
12
Links
178

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

View velocity

How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.

1 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
PostReadingsLatest readingCurve24h reachHalf of last-observed views by
/3537 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC31.6 hours2.8 hours old26,800 views ~522 reactionsno checkpoint reading yetstill climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.6 hoursupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing

Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.

Reaction mix

89,235 reactions across 31 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29,53033.1%
22,67225.4%
🔥6,7047.51%
😁4,9475.54%
🤩4,3414.86%
🐳3,4973.92%
👌2,8803.23%
😱2,8593.20%
😍2,6112.93%
2,4402.73%
🗿1,8662.09%
😐1,7531.96%
🎉9741.09%
🤝8400.941%
🤡7970.893%
❤‍🔥5240.587%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89,235 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 14:04 UTC≈91,800 views2,429 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

📌 Toyosa adds BTC alongside USDT for Toyota purchases ⚠️ Toyosa has introduced Bitcoin as a payment option for Toyota vehicle purchases in Bolivia, expanding its digital-asset checkout service one year after launching USDT payments. Eju TV reported that the company unveiled the Bitcoin service on Sept. 18 at Expocruz 2026 in Santa Cruz, where Toyosa said customers could now choose BTC alongside bolivianos, U.S. doll

👍818631🐳400🔥275😍162😐7268😱2

14 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC≈102,000 views4,015 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

➡️ Hong Kong man loses HK$13 million in fake crypto investment app scam 🌐 A Hong Kong man in his 70s has lost more than HK$13 million ($1.67 million) after a self-described cryptocurrency investment expert contacted him through WhatsApp and directed him to a fake trading app. The latest case began when the elderly man received an unsolicited WhatsApp message from someone claiming to be a cryptocurrency investment ex

👍1,550712😁413🔥411🤩379🐳221183😱55

9 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC≈97,800 views4,278 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🔔 Ethereum price breakout hinges on a close above $2,535 ➡️ Ethereum price hovered around $2,500 on Sep. 9 as buyers defended short-term support, but weakening momentum and negative capital flows kept a breakout above $2,535 out of reach. Ethereum price traded near $2,486 at the time of writing on Sep. 9 after briefly rising above $2,520 earlier in the session. Price remained almost unchanged on the daily chart as b

1,400👍1,020🤝654🐳463😍257🔥150🗿14866

4 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈109,000 views2,430 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video

The wait is over. The public launch is happening right now. No more countdowns. No more waiting. If you’ve been watching ECOSSE build, this is the moment to tune in. Join the Live: https://youtube.com/live/qmyd6B2V-mQ?si=0LZvsNSZIHtZWYY1 X:https://x.com/ECOSSECOIN/ Discord: https://discord.gg/y5AN9jXGuE Telegram: https://t.me/ecossecoin Website: https://www.ecosse-coin.io/

👍892384🔥277👌249🤡213🐳144😐118🗿73

3 Sept 2026, 15:05 UTC≈115,000 views2,346 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🤖 Can't Follow Every Trade? Trading bots can actually simplify your life Problem: You have a strategy but you can't execute it every day. Markets move 24/7, you have work, sleep, life. You miss moves. You can't stick to your plan consistently. That's where trading bots help. WhiteBIT has Grid and DCA bots that execute your strategy automatically 24/7. Grid Bot: You set a price range (like Bitcoin $49k-$51k). Bot auto

👍1,070340🔥238😁173🤩168😐119🗿10470

30 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈108,000 views3,783 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🔔 Kalshi ruling puts CFTC prediction rules at risk ⚠️ A federal appeals court ruled on Aug. 28 that Kalshi had not shown Nevada’s regulation of its sports-event contracts was likely preempted by federal commodities law. The unanimous decision allows Nevada gaming authorities to enforce state requirements while litigation continues. ⚠️ Kalshi argued that its sports-event contracts qualified as swaps under the Commod

👍1,490675🔥448😁381🤩284🐳210160🗿79

25 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈109,000 views2,435 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🚀 WBT Hits New All-Time High, Up Nearly 14% From Its Previous Peak WhiteBIT coin (WBT) reached $73, rising from its previous ATH of $64.11 in December 2025, and is currently trading at around $72. The milestone comes amid Whitechain’s relaunch as a distribution-first Ethereum Layer 2 and W Group’s continued growth to over 40 million users globally. WBT’s full supply was unlocked in 2026, while its deflationary mech

👍777556👌377🐳253🔥155❤‍🔥84🤩6661

19 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈106,000 views4,061 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

‼️ The CLARITY Act won’t move markets 🔖 Forget short-term price charts – Washington’s digital asset framework is the legal authorization that conservative wealth managers have been waiting for before they can put trillions to work. Everyone seems to be watching the CLARITY Act for the same thing. From retail traders to institutional giants, people are waiting for the green light that confirms Washington has clarifie

👍1,360927😁652🤩453🔥269🗿133🐳119🤝62

18 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC≈110,000 views2,479 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Whitechain is relaunching as a distribution-first Ethereum L2, built on the OP Stack and supported by W Group, a global fintech ecosystem reaching 40M+ users worldwide, alongside WhiteBIT, a cryptocurrency exchange with 10M+ users. The relaunch introduces three tracks for Web3 projects at different stages: • Builder Program — for early-stage teams, with funding of up to $300K per eligible project and support from t

👍821585405🐳252🔥133🗿85😍71❤‍🔥41

14 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈112,000 views2,236 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

👀 You already have opinions on crypto. Why not trade them? Will BTC hit the next big milestone? Will ETH outperform? Will the next crypto headline send the market flying? Probly is a prediction market where you can trade on what you think will happen next. No need to guess entries and exits. No 20 indicators. No staring at candles all day. On Probly, it’s simple: 🔥 Find a crypto event 🎯 Pick YES or NO 💰 If you

👍1,070364🔥248😁176🤩134😐89🗿8850

12 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈121,000 views3,822 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

⚠️ Fidelity plans Ethereum staking for $898M FETH fund 🔖 Fidelity has moved to add Ethereum staking and quarterly cash distributions to its $898 million Fidelity Ethereum Fund, with the trust allowed to stake as much as 100% of its ETH under normal conditions. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing submitted on Aug. 11 shows that Fidelity amended the fund’s registration statement to include staking, allo

👍1,290939👌602🎉417😍233🗿111🔥109🐳69

7 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈122,000 views2,450 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Search-Casino — casino & slot reviews. Plus: weekly tournaments, no deposit, prizes in crypto We run free-to-play tournaments on the site. You get a stack of tournament chips, play the featured slots, and every win adds to your score. Losses cost chips, never points — a bad run shortens your session, not your position on the board. Top 30 places share 6,000 CP every week. CP convert to POL, SOL, TON, XRP or USDT (T

825👍563🎉384😍274🐳169🗿69🔥64❤‍🔥57

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @garden_btc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

11 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

maczo.co5 posts · 9 July 2026 – 2 August 2026 · example post
bit.ly2 posts · 9 July 2026 – 21 July 2026 · example post
bc.game1 post · 19 July 2026 – 19 July 2026 · example post
www.coinstore.comregistrable domain: coinstore.com1 post · 9 July 2026 – 9 July 2026 · example post
discord.gg1 post · 9 July 2026 – 9 July 2026 · example post
fate.bet1 post · 6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post
tangem.onelink.meregistrable domain: onelink.me1 post · 8 July 2026 – 8 July 2026 · example post
search-casino.com1 post · 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
tglink.io1 post · 21 July 2026 – 21 July 2026 · example post
tokentactics.xyz1 post · 8 July 2026 – 8 July 2026 · example post
x.com1 post · 9 July 2026 – 9 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Garden” (@garden_btc), 999,302 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/garden_btc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.