Придумала для всех идеальный аргумент - пользуйтесь)) Можно поблагодарить😄🤝 На видео: роза плетистая (клаймбер) Розариум Ютерзен
❤27👍15💯10🔥3🤣1

Channel
@gardenklad
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,474subscribers
-408 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001610266450 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gardenklad |
| Description | Я знаю про розы всё! Канал ведёт Людмила Ижукова (директор питомника роз ГарденКлад) https://vk.com/gardenklad |
| Created | 10 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gardenklad |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 18:59 | 16,474 | -2 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:10 | 16,476 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:27 | 16,477 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:37 | 16,483 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:01 | 16,485 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:04 | 16,493 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:17 | 16,503 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 16,506 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:08 | 16,513 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 18:09 | 16,514 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:31 | 16,519 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:05 | 16,521 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 16,520 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 16,526 | -5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:27 | 16,531 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:41 | 16,533 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:26 | 16,537 | -7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 16,544 | -1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:09 | 16,545 | -6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:04 | 16,551 | first reading |
84 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 84 (3 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 27,379 |
| Reactions total | 1,331 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 04:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,100 reactions across 80 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,395 | 58.4% | |
| 👍 | 740 | 18.0% | |
| 🔥 | 330 | 8.05% | |
| 😁 | 106 | 2.59% | |
| 💯 | 86 | 2.10% | |
| custom 5413852121088946328 | 81 | 1.98% | |
| 😍 | 78 | 1.90% | |
| custom 5411165047814653579 | 49 | 1.20% | |
| 🤣 | 47 | 1.15% | |
| 🙏 | 37 | 0.902% | |
| 🥰 | 31 | 0.756% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 0.585% | |
| 😭 | 15 | 0.366% | |
| ✍ | 11 | 0.268% | |
| 👀 | 11 | 0.268% | |
| 💔 | 11 | 0.268% | |
| custom 5411402641110498264 | 9 | 0.22% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 0.22% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 0.171% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.146% | |
| 5 further kinds | 17 | 0.415% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (13.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Придумала для всех идеальный аргумент - пользуйтесь)) Можно поблагодарить😄🤝 На видео: роза плетистая (клаймбер) Розариум Ютерзен
❤27👍15💯10🔥3🤣1
Posted without readable text
❤33👍24😁11🔥2custom 54114026411104982641
Мы часто говорим «роза Кордеса», даже не задумываясь, что за одной фамилией скрывается несколько поколений одной семьи и больше века селекционной работы! С чего начинался питомник, почему Кордесам понадобилась собственная Rosa kordesii и как из миллиона семян выбирают будущие сорта - в статье собрала самое интересное из истории знаменитой розовой династии♥️ ♥️ https://vk.ru/@gardenklad-kordes-rozovaya-dinastiya На…
❤63
Снова в строю! 💪 https://gardenklad.ru/ Сайт починен, всё работает. Но есть нюанс: 10 ноября мы закрываем продажи саженцев ОКС на этот сезон! Если что-то давно лежит в корзине - не откладывайте заказ в долгий ящик. После 10 числа можно будет только любоваться сортами и составлять списки желаний на следующий год.))
👍21🎉7❤3
«Есть в светлости осенних вечеров Умильная, таинственная прелесть: Зловещий блеск и пестрота дерев, Багряных листьев томный, легкий шелест, Туманная и тихая лазурь Над грустно-сиротеющей землёю, И, как предчувствие сходящих бурь, Порывистый, холодный ветр порою, Ущерб, изнеможенье - и на всём Та кроткая улыбка увяданья, Что в существе разумном мы зовём Божественной стыдливостью страданья.» Ф. И. Тютчев. «Осенний веч…
❤53custom 541116504781465357911🥰7👍5❤🔥2
Назвал в честь себя розу другого селекционера🤔 А вы знали, что Грэм Томас сам выбрал розу, которая будет носить его имя? Дэвид Остин представил сорт в 1983 году. И имя здесь совсем не случайное. Грэм Стюарт Томас (1909-2003) - знаменитый британский садовод, который очень много сделал для сохранения и возвращения интереса к старинным розам (на фото). Он часто приезжал в питомник Дэвида Остина и поддерживал его рабо…
❤51👍21custom 54111650478146535796
Posted without readable text
❤60👍18custom 54138521210889463285🤩1
Posted without readable text
👍35❤14custom 541116504781465357914
❕Наш сайт временно недоступен Сейчас разбираемся с проблемой и стараемся как можно скорее всё восстановить. На образовательной платформе тоже у кого-то могут возникать сбои. Самое главное - все ваши заказы и данные в сохранности! Ничего не потерялось, переживать не нужно. Скоро всё заработает в обычном режиме💪 Спасибо за понимание! (P.S. поддержите пост реакциями, а то утро началось так себе)))
❤94custom 541385212108894632830🙏11custom 54111650478146535797custom 54114026411104982645🤗2🕊1
Какой сорт розы на видео?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Какой сорт розы на видео? Варианты ответа в следующем посте♥️
❤10
Розы на коленях. Да, и такая мода была! На Неделе моды в Лондоне британский бренд KNWLS выпустил моделей с нарисованными на коленях розами. Казалось бы, очередная фантазия дизайнеров. А вот и нет - ровно так модницы развлекались ещё 100 лет назад. В 1920-х платья стали короче, чулки начали скатывать ниже колена, и открывшийся участок ноги быстро превратился в место для творчества. Сначала колени просто подрумянивал…
👍34custom 541385212108894632811❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @gardenklad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой сорт розы на видео?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой сорт розы на видео?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой сорт розы на видео?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой сорт розы на видео?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой сорт розы на видео?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ижукова Людмила” (@gardenklad), 16,474 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gardenklad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.