Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for گاو پولدار | ترید | سیگنال

Channel

گاو پولدار | ترید | سیگنال

@gavepuldar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

677,907subscribers

-126,634 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002293767326
TypeChannel
Username@gavepuldar
Description🐂 اینجا تریدرها جلوتر از بازار حرکت می‌کنند 📚 آموزش معامله‌گری 📊 تحلیل تکنیکال و فاندامنتال 🎯 سیگنال‌های معاملاتی منتخب ⚡ اخبار مهم بازار در لحظه 📩 ارتباط: @Tradevamasupport
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gavepuldar

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

677,907804,541741,2246 August 2026 — 804,541 subscribers6 August 2026 — 804,251 subscribers7 August 2026 — 800,080 subscribers8 August 2026 — 794,717 subscribers9 August 2026 — 790,263 subscribers10 August 2026 — 784,342 subscribers11 August 2026 — 779,691 subscribers12 August 2026 — 775,514 subscribers13 August 2026 — 771,041 subscribers15 August 2026 — 765,071 subscribers16 August 2026 — 757,958 subscribers17 August 2026 — 754,983 subscribers18 August 2026 — 752,374 subscribers19 August 2026 — 749,331 subscribers20 August 2026 — 745,683 subscribers22 August 2026 — 740,442 subscribers23 August 2026 — 736,281 subscribers25 August 2026 — 733,264 subscribers26 August 2026 — 730,902 subscribers27 August 2026 — 728,803 subscribers28 August 2026 — 726,282 subscribers29 August 2026 — 722,997 subscribers30 August 2026 — 720,693 subscribers31 August 2026 — 717,638 subscribers1 September 2026 — 715,136 subscribers2 September 2026 — 713,279 subscribers3 September 2026 — 709,855 subscribers5 September 2026 — 705,820 subscribers8 September 2026 — 698,943 subscribers11 September 2026 — 693,362 subscribers12 September 2026 — 689,147 subscribers14 September 2026 — 685,944 subscribers16 September 2026 — 682,094 subscribers18 September 2026 — 677,907 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -126,634. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 658,912–823,536 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:19677,907-4,187
16 Sept 2026, 13:56682,094-3,850
14 Sept 2026, 14:59685,944-3,203
12 Sept 2026, 23:21689,147-4,215
11 Sept 2026, 02:39693,362-5,581
8 Sept 2026, 03:57698,943-6,877
5 Sept 2026, 00:36705,820-4,035
3 Sept 2026, 10:44709,855-3,424
2 Sept 2026, 04:03713,279-1,857
1 Sept 2026, 05:46715,136-2,502
31 Aug 2026, 06:49717,638-3,055
30 Aug 2026, 05:28720,693-2,304
29 Aug 2026, 08:17722,997-3,285
28 Aug 2026, 06:04726,282-2,521
27 Aug 2026, 02:59728,803-2,099
26 Aug 2026, 00:13730,902-2,362
25 Aug 2026, 03:24733,264-3,017
23 Aug 2026, 19:59736,281-4,161
22 Aug 2026, 04:36740,442-5,241
20 Aug 2026, 19:24745,683first reading

Engagement

560 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.707%
avg views ÷ 677,907 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,790
305 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.572%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
307
of 560 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 304 of 305 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held560 (5 August 202621 September 2026)
Views total1,461,240
Reactions total8,361
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 06:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
15,700
Videos
287
Links
5,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 27s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

View velocity

How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.

8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
PostReadingsLatest readingCurve24h reachHalf of last-observed views by
/180436 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC38 minutes69 minutes old3,380 views ~36 reactions60 minutes: 3,256 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h17 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/180426 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC427 minutes1.9 hours old3,740 views ~47 reactions60 minutes: 2,210 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h52 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/180416 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC72 minutes3.0 hours old4,500 views ~31 reactions60 minutes: 1,4103.0 hours: 4,500still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/180406 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC725 minutes3.4 hours old4,250 views ~21 reactions60 minutes: 1,454 interp.3.0 hours: 4,050still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/180396 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC826 minutes4.0 hours old4,400 views ~15 reactions60 minutes: 1,2703.0 hours: 3,250still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h2.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/180386 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC1030 minutes5.2 hours old3,350 views ~22 reactions60 minutes: 1,125 interp.3.0 hours: 2,399 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/180376 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC112 minutes5.2 hours old3,330 views ~13 reactions60 minutes: 1,195 interp.3.0 hours: 2,373 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/180366 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC115 minutes5.3 hours old3,010 views ~11 reactions60 minutes: 1,212 interp.3.0 hours: 2,321 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing

Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.

Reaction mix

14,270 reactions across 544 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,41144.9%
👍3,15422.1%
🔥2,73719.2%
😁7425.20%
😐6444.51%
😭2912.04%
🐳2091.46%
👏820.575%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 555 of the 560 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,472 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 560 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 20:31 UTC≈2,510 views33 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🪙 BTC: 87,000 $ 🔼 🪙 ETH: 2,800 $ 🔼 💸 @GavePuldar

🔥226👍3😁2

Signed Hadi Kaley

21 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC≈2,730 views18 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🚨 روز سرنوشت‌ساز برای بیتکوین! 🪙 ⚪️🔻بیت‌کوین دوباره بالای میانگین متحرک 50 هفته‌ای قرار گرفته؛ اما یک هشدار تاریخی وجود داره: ⚪️ در آوریل 2022 هم بیتکوین از این سطح عبور کرد، ولی نتونست حدود 5% بالاتر از اون تثبیت بشه و بعد با ریزش سنگینی روبه‌رو شد. 📌 این بار سطح کلیدی 83,500 دلار هست. ✅ کلوز روزانه بالای 83.5K : تأیید قدرتمندتر سناریوی صعودی ⚠️ ناتوانی در تثبیت: خطر تکرار یک شکست کاذب ✅ کلوز امروز بیتکوین اهمی

👍12🔥42

Signed Hadi Kaley

21 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC≈3,780 views32 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🚨 شورت‌ها زیر چرخ بیتکوین له شدن! 🪙 ⚪️ در کمتر از 1 ساعت، 618 میلیون دلار حجم خالص خرید تهاجمی وارد بایننس شد و همزمان با عبور بیت‌کوین از 85 هزار دلار، بیش از 400 میلیون دلار پوزیشن شورت لیکویید شد. 🔥 ✅ فشار خرید سنگین + شورت‌اسکوئیز؛ ترکیبی که می‌تونه سوخت ادامه حرکت بیتکوین باشه. 🪙 💸 @GavePuldar

🔥168👍4😭4

Signed Hadi Kaley

21 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTC≈3,920 views15 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🔥 افزایش مجدد فعالیت ماینرها 🪙 📊 هش‌ریت بیتکوین پس از پایان روند نزولی اخیر، دوباره رو به افزایش هست؛ نشانه‌ای از بازگشت قدرت پردازشی و افزایش فعالیت ماینرها. 📈 ✅ رشد هش‌ریت معمولاً به معنی اعتماد بیشتر ماینرها به شبکه و تقویت امنیت بیت‌کوین هست. 🪙 💸 @GavePuldar

👍94🔥2

Signed Hadi Kaley

21 Sept 2026, 13:49 UTC≈3,690 views23 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🔥 اتریوم آماده‌ی یک حرکت بزرگ؟ 💵 ⚪️ اتریوم هفته رو با +6.77% بست و بالاخره از محدوده‌ای خارج شد که در ۳ شکست قبلی ، رالی‌های قدرتمندی به‌ دنبال داشت. 📈 ⚪️ اگر این شکست حفظ بشه، محدوده 3,200 تا 3,600 دلار اهداف بعتی خواهند بود. 🪙 ⚪️ حمایت‌های مهم: ⚪️ 1,900 دلار ⚪️ 1,500 دلار ⚠️ اما اگر اتریوم دوباره به زیر باکس برگرده، مومنتوم این شکست می‌تونه تضعیف بشه. ✅ فعلاً نگاه‌ها به تثبیت بالای محدوده شکست هست 💸 @GavePuld

10😐6👍4🔥3

Signed Hadi Kaley

21 Sept 2026, 13:10 UTC≈3,280 views131 reactionsread 22 September 2026

سیگنال بریم؟ 💰 ری اکشن (50+)

👍9424🔥13

21 Sept 2026, 12:30 UTC≈3,320 views43 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

⚪️بیتکوین به 85,000 دلار رسید 🪙🔥 💸 @GavePuldar

🔥2410😭5👍4

Signed Hadi Kaley

21 Sept 2026, 12:05 UTC≈3,350 views19 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

⚪️شرکت استراتژی مایکل سیلور اقدام به خرید 950 عدد بیتکوین به ارزش 75 میلیون دلار کرد. 🪙 💸 @GavePuldar

7👍7🔥5

Signed Hadi Kaley

21 Sept 2026, 09:34 UTC≈3,570 views21 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video

⚪️ بیت‌کوین بالاخره میانگین متحرک 50 هفته‌ای رو شکست! 🪙 ⚪️ از نظر تاریخی، عبور و تثبیت بالای 50W MA یکی از مهم‌ ترین سیگنال‌ هایی بوده که در چرخه‌های قبلی، شروع فاز قدرتمند صعودی بیت‌کوین رو همراهی کرده. 🔥 ⚪️ حالا مهم‌ترین چیز، حفظ این سطح و تثبیت بالای اون در تایم‌فریم هفتگیست. ✅ اگر این شکست تأیید بشه، ساختار بازار میتونه وارد مرحله بسیار مهم‌تری از روند صعودی بشه. 💸 @GavePuldar

🔥11👍64

Signed Hadi Kaley

21 Sept 2026, 08:44 UTC≈3,470 views39 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🚨 بیتکوین به 84,000 دلار رسید! 🪙🔼 💸 @GavePuldar

🔥268👍5

Signed Hadi Kaley

21 Sept 2026, 08:32 UTC≈3,490 views22 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

⚪️ هم‌اکنون بیتکوین 82,000 دلاری 🪙 💸 @GavePuldar

👍9🔥94

Signed Hadi Kaley

21 Sept 2026, 08:08 UTC≈3,680 views19 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

⚪️ برای موفقیت لازم نیست تصمیم‌ های زیادی بگیرید. گاهی چند تصمیم مهم و درست میتونن مسیر سرمایه‌گذاری رو عوض کنن. 📌 از اون مهم‌تر، باید جلوی اشتباهات بزرگی رو که ممکن سال‌ها تلاش رو از بین ببرن رو بگیرید. ✅ در بازار، کیفیت تصمیم‌ ها مهم‌تر از تعداد اون هاست. 💸 @GavePuldar

9👍7🔥3

Signed Hadi Kaley

Showing the 12 most recent of 560 posts we hold for @gavepuldar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@gavepuldar edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 September 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Sept 2026, 21:58 UTCAnonymous Poll279 voters

چه ساعتی ارائه بدیم انلاینی و میتونی ازش استفاده کنی؟ همه بگین به یک برایند برسیم❤

  1. بین ساعت ده صبح تا دو ظهر ☀️24%
  2. بین ساعت دو ظهر تا هفت شب 🌗35%
  3. بین ساعت هفت شب‌تا دوازده شب🌙57%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTCAnonymous Poll125 voters

من میگم بازار یک اصلاح روند داره پس بهتره سِیو سود کنم 😁🪙

  1. نه بابا ادامه داره روند صعودی ↗️33%
  2. باشه پس منم سیو سود میکنم🪙70%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTCFinal Results161 voters

تحلیلمون چی باشه؟

  1. بیت کوین43%
  2. اتریوم30%
  3. آدا17%
  4. ریپل29%
  5. هایپرلیکویید16%
  6. بی ان بی13%
  7. سولانا34%
  8. دوج23%
  9. فارت کوین14%

The shares total 219%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 560 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

www.lbkpro.netregistrable domain: lbkpro.net5 posts · 5 August 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“گاو پولدار | ترید | سیگنال” (@gavepuldar), 677,907 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gavepuldar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.