Channel
@gazna1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,416subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001671109427 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gazna1 |
| Created | 17 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gazna1 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 4,416 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 4,426 | -15 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 4,441 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 4,450 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 4,451 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 4,461 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 4,468 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 4,473 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 4,471 | +26 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 4,445 | +21 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 4,424 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:21 | 4,417 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 4,422 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 4,422 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
210 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 62 | 29.5% | |
| 🤣 | 42 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 17.1% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 12.4% | |
| 🤔 | 21 | 10.0% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 2.86% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 2.86% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 2.38% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.476% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.476% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Rossiyada "Царь хороший, бояре плохие" degan formula tez tez ishlatib turiladi. Putinni obrazini yaxshilash uchun amaldorlarga odamlarni jaxlini chiqaruvchi topshiriqlar beriladi va bu xayp bo'lganidan keyin Putin ularni urishib hammasini joy joyiga qo'yadi. Bu formula hozirda Rossiyada ishlayapdi deb bo'lmaydi, chunki urush bu umuman boshqa mavzu. Bu formula faqat tinchlik davrda yaxshi ishlashi mumkin. Ammo rus el…
🤣31🔥9💯3🤡1
Yangi O'zbekiston universiteti 843 mln so'mga robot kompleksini xarid qildi Xarid hujjatlariga ko'ra, universitet 1 ta robot-gumanoid, bitta 4 oyoqli robot, bu robotlarni integratsiya qilish va xodimlarga ulardan foydalanishni o'rgatish bo'yicha xizmatni xarid qilgan. Umid qilamanki bu robotlar tadbirma tadbir raqs tushib yurmaydi. Video: "Ipak yo'lidagi turizm 2025" da robot-gumanoid raqsi @gazna1
😁18
"Toshkent-Markaziy vokzali" va "Toshkent-Janubuy" stansiyasi kredit ta'minoti sifatida garovga qo'yilmoqda Bu haqida vokzal binolarini sug'urtalash bo'yicha o'tkazilgan 2 mlrd so'mlik xaridda ma'lum qilingan. Xarid hujjatlarida bu ma'lumot nega qo'shilgani tushunarsiz. Shu bilan birga hujjatlarda aynan qaysi kreditga ta'minot sifatida garovga qo'yilgani ma'lum qilinmagan. Yanvarda kompaniya 200 ta yo‘lovchi vagoni…
🤔7👍3
Hozirgina "Yangi O'zbekiston" va "Pravda Vostoka" gazetalarini 2026-yilda chop etish bo'yicha 6,3 mlrd so'mlik tender o'z yakuniga yetdi. Ha, 2026-yil davomida, 1-yanvardan 31-dekabrgacha - 29-iyulda. Tender natijasi shu yaqin kunlarda e'lon qilinadi. Yanvardan buyon bu gazetalar chiqmayotganmidi? Yo'q, chiqayotgandi. Yanvardan buyon ularni "Sharq" AJ chop etib kelyapdi. Topinglarchi tenderni kim yutadi? Tender hu…
😁13👍3🔥2
200 mln so'mlik ostanovkalar Ba'zi odamlar bilan suhbatda "mana shu ikkita tunika 200 mlnga olinganakan, shuni yozmaysanmi" degan gapni eshityapman. Shuncha muhokamadan keyin odamlar haligacha ko'chada shuni gapirib yurishganini sezdim. Bu masala qanday shishib ketganini tushunmay qoldim ham. Birinchi marta ko'rganimda bu auksionligini o'qidim: "tushunarli, demak tadbirkorlar sotib olib, u yerda joylashadigan rek…
👍5🔥5
587,8 mlrd so'mni maqsadsiz sarflanishini oldi olingan Kecha Korrupsiyaga qarshi kurashish agentligida 2026-yilning birinchi yarim yilligida amalga oshirilgan ishlar bo'yicha jamoatchilik eshituvi bo'lib o'tdi. Agentlik jamoat kengashi a'zosi sifatida man ham yig'ilishda ishtirok etdim. Statistika bilan qisqacha bo'lishaman: 🟢2026-yilning birinchi yarim yilligida korrupsiyaga qarshi ichki nazorat bo‘linmalari tom…
🔥6👍5
Maktabgacha va maktab ta'lim vazirligini mana bu xaridini ko'rib amaldorlarimizdagi bir tendensiya esimga tushib ketdi. Xarid vazirlikni tadbirlarini o'tkazish bo'yicha, jumladan 536 mln so'mlik musobaqa (sotib olinadigan predmetlardan qilgan xulosam). Xarid qilinayotgan mahsulotlar manga ulgurji bozor narxidan baland tuyulgan bo'lsa-da, post mavzusi boshqa. Maktab paytimdan turli xil tadbirlarda qatnashar edim va …
🔥3😁2
@revizor_uzb xaridlarni qanday o'rganishiga qiziqaman doim. Kuniga 100lab xaridlar e'lon qilinadi, ularni orasidan shubhalisini topish uchun qancha hujjatni va korxonalarni o'rganib chiqish, taqqoslash kerak. Revizor esa har bir hujjatni ikir chikirigacha o'rganadi va ba'zida har kuni post joylaydi. Qanday ulgurarkan. Kanal anonim, lekin egasi bilan osh ustida suhbatlashishga yo'q demasdim. Bir ikki joyda shu kanal…
😁12👍2🔥1
Xavfsiz shahar tizimlarni rivojlantirish markazi tanlovni 1-iyun dan beri 3 marta o'tkazishga harakat qilgan ekan (1,2,3). Har safar ishtirokchilar texnik talablarga to'g'ri kelmagani uchun chetlashtirib yuborilgan. Oxirida bitta ishtirokchi qolgan yoki umuman qolmagan. Shu sabab xaridlar bekor bo'lavergan va to'rtinchisi o'tgan. Juda g'alati holat. Bir tomondan Markaz harakat qilganini qayd etish kerak, ikkinchi to…
🤔6👍1
O'zbekona klassik xarid OTMga kirish imtihonlari o'z yakuniga yetdi, imtihonlar 14-23 - iyul sanasida bo'lib o'tdi, ammo imtihonlarda kameralarni montaj va demontasj qilish bo'yicha 2,3 mlrd so'mlik xarid kecha yakunlandi. 27-iyul kuni IIV qoshidagi Xavfsiz shahar tizimlarni rivojlantirish markazi bu bilan bog'liq tanlov natijalarini e'lon qildi, unda "Smart Technology Systems" MChJ 2 mlrd 286 mln so'm taklif bila…
😁14🤣11😭5👍1💯1🤔1
Yangi O‘zbekiston universiteti Garvard, Abu Dabi va 2 mlrdlik Spektrometr Yangi O‘zbekiston universiteti AQShdagi Garvard universitetining Oliy ta'lim maktabi huzuridagi kasbiy ta’lim dasturlarida ishtirok etish bo‘yicha shartnoma imzoladi. Shartnoma qiymati — 190 ming dollar yoki hozirgi kurs bo‘yicha 2,3 mlrd so‘m. Hujjatga ko‘ra, dasturlarda “Rektorlar maktabi” bitiruvchilari ishtirok etishi ko‘zda tutilgan. U…
😱6🔥2🤔2
Shu harajatlar o'zini oqlaganmikan yoki oqlarmikan? @gazna1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @gazna1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“G'azna” (@gazna1), 4,416 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gazna1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.