Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GBS102_السيرة المهنية

Channel

GBS102_السيرة المهنية

@gbs102ahmads23

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,032subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 24 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001967804675
TypeChannel
Username@gbs102ahmads23
Descriptionرابط القناة ✨ https://t.me/gbs102ahmads23 هي حسابي للي عنده اشكالية بشي 💜 @ahmadja23hama
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 September 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/gbs102ahmads23

Growth

1,03224 Sept 2026, 22:47 — 1,032 subscribers24 Sept 2026, 23:22 — 1,032 subscribers24 Sept 2026, 22:4724 Sept 2026, 23:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,031–1,033 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 23:221,032no change
24 Sept 2026, 22:471,032first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
19
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2757.4%
❤‍🔥1429.8%
😎48.51%
👌12.13%
🔥12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2025 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jun 2026, 08:57 UTC275 views3 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥2❤1

Signed Ahmad J

30 Oct 2025, 17:38 UTC≈2,020 views4 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

🔸اعلان كورسات F24🔸

❤4

Signed Ahmad J

25 Jun 2025, 17:08 UTC≈2,130 views1 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Forwarded from @iis202_303_AJ_F23

مساء الخير ✨ اعلان بخصوص مادة *TIC: IIS202* *BAIT: IIS303* ⚡ جلسة امتحانية ⚡ شاملة وكافية ان شاء الله 👈🏻الجلسة بكرا بتنزل ع غروب خاص 🔺 اوفلاين مسجلة 🔺بتشمل النظري والعملي ودورات 🔺تكلفة : 25 الف 🔺المدة : 3_4 ساعات تواصل وحجز : Telegram: @ahmadja23hama Whatsapp: 0991287726

❤‍🔥1

Signed Ahmad J

13 May 2025, 16:03 UTC≈2,550 views4 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Poll

كيف قدمت ؟

  1. 90 ومافوق18%
  2. 80 و ما فوق10%
  3. 70 وما فوق19%
  4. 60 وما فوق22%
  5. رفعتا مساعدة 🥲9%
  6. حملتا 💔21%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤4

Signed Amal

13 May 2025, 12:28 UTC≈2,430 views16 reactionsread 24 September 2026

كفاية لهون كرمال ما بقى تتخربط المعلومات عندكن 🙃 + حاولت نزل كل اسئلة الدورات والاسئلة المهمة يلي عرضها الدكتور وحكا عنها .. وبالتوفيق للجميع إن شاء الله ، وإن شاء الله ميسرة أموركن بأعلى العلامات والمعدلات 🤍 وانتو وعم تحلو ركزو شوي بالسؤال ولا تستعجلو وإن شاء الله بتكون سهلة .. + بس تطلعو طمنونا ابقى واكتبو شو بيجيكن كرمال الطلاب يلي بعدكن وبس 🤗🤍🤍

❤‍🔥9❤7

Signed Amal

13 May 2025, 12:25 UTCviews —

GBS102_السيرة المهنية pinned «نهاية النموذج الثاني ✨»

13 May 2025, 12:24 UTC≈2,040 views2 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Poll

من قنوات التواصل العامة ؟

  1. الصدق2%
  2. الود1%
  3. التأجيل1%
  4. الاهتمام1%
  5. التعديل0%
  6. جميع ماسبق13%
  7. الخيار 1&2&483%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤2

Signed Amal

13 May 2025, 12:23 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 24 September 2026
Poll

عند تقديم عرض تقديمي ، حجم الخط المناسب للنصوص هو ؟

  1. من 24 وحتى 3426%
  2. من 20 وحتى 3018%
  3. من 25 وحتى 359%
  4. من 24 وحتى 2847%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Amal

13 May 2025, 12:20 UTC≈1,690 views0 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Poll

كل مايلي صحيح بالنسبة للكتابة التقنية ، ماعدا ؟

  1. الاعتماد على الحقائق والبراهين4%
  2. سهولة العبارة6%
  3. تعتمد على لغة العاطفة63%
  4. لا تحتاج موهبة27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Amal

13 May 2025, 12:19 UTC≈1,630 views2 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Poll

إن الإلتزام بعلامات الترقيم تنتمي لمهارة التنظيم (الشكل) وتعد من مهارات الكتابة الجيدة ؟

  1. صح96%
  2. خطأ4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤‍🔥2

Signed Amal

13 May 2025, 12:11 UTC≈1,560 views2 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Poll

يعتبر المسح الاستبياني أبطئ بكثير ومكلف أكثر من الاستبيان ؟

  1. صح62%
  2. غلط38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤2

Signed Amal

13 May 2025, 12:08 UTC≈1,470 views0 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Poll

الهدف المباشر للقيام بمسح استبياني هو الحصول على معلومات وكذلك استطلاع الآراء والأفكار حول موضوع من أجل توظيف النتائج في اتخاذ قرارات ؟

  1. صح97%
  2. خطأ3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Amal

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gbs102ahmads23. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 May 2025, 16:03 UTCAnonymous Poll201 voters

كيف قدمت ؟

  1. 90 ومافوق18%
  2. 80 و ما فوق10%
  3. 70 وما فوق19%
  4. 60 وما فوق22%
  5. رفعتا مساعدة 🥲9%
  6. حملتا 💔21%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 May 2025, 12:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz529 voters

من قنوات التواصل العامة ؟

  1. الصدق2%
  2. الود1%
  3. التأجيل1%
  4. الاهتمام1%
  5. التعديل0%
  6. جميع ماسبق13%
  7. الخيار 1&2&483%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 May 2025, 12:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz502 voters

عند تقديم عرض تقديمي ، حجم الخط المناسب للنصوص هو ؟

  1. من 24 وحتى 3426%
  2. من 20 وحتى 3018%
  3. من 25 وحتى 359%
  4. من 24 وحتى 2847%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 May 2025, 12:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz497 voters

كل مايلي صحيح بالنسبة للكتابة التقنية ، ماعدا ؟

  1. الاعتماد على الحقائق والبراهين4%
  2. سهولة العبارة6%
  3. تعتمد على لغة العاطفة63%
  4. لا تحتاج موهبة27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 May 2025, 12:19 UTCAnonymous Quiz490 voters

إن الإلتزام بعلامات الترقيم تنتمي لمهارة التنظيم (الشكل) وتعد من مهارات الكتابة الجيدة ؟

  1. صح96%
  2. خطأ4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 May 2025, 12:11 UTCAnonymous Quiz477 voters

يعتبر المسح الاستبياني أبطئ بكثير ومكلف أكثر من الاستبيان ؟

  1. صح62%
  2. غلط38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2025 to 24 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الجامعة الافتراضية السورية
@svuonlineTic · 21,091
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GBS102_السيرة المهنية” (@gbs102ahmads23), 1,032 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gbs102ahmads23.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.