За аналит #неоднозначные_цитаты

Channel
где мой код?
@gdemoikod
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
221subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003706070984 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gdemoikod |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 10 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gdemoikod |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 221 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 224 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 229 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 233 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 235 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 235 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
101 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5380055186645462365 | 38 | 37.6% | |
| custom 5379772410293661777 | 24 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5381839260225645173 | 24 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5379735164337269039 | 15 | 14.9% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Когда плачу за Клод, ощущение, что плачу за коммуналку #неоднозначные_цитаты
custom 53800551866454623659
ЕСЛИ ТУТ ЕСТЬ HR ИЛИ РАЗРАБОТЧИКИ БЕТКИ БУКМЕКЕРЫ ОТМЫВ БАБОК КРИПТА ПАЛАНТИР МОССАД НЕЛЕГАЛЬНЫЕ СХЕМКИ НИ В КОЕМ СЛУЧЕН НЕ ПИШИТЕ МНЕ в ЛС @strs1nc И ТОЧНО НЕ ПИШИТЕ, ЕСЛИ У ВАС ПРЕДУСМОТРЕНА РЕЛОКАЦИЯ КИПР, и в другие страны кроме РФ
custom 53818392602256451736
бля я вот думаю много работаем, пашем, трудимся получаем результат весь мир дохуя трудится вроде уже все блага есть вроде норм живем более менее нет бы блять всем чуть выдохнуть и работать поменьше нихуя надо вечно бежать куда то этим капиталюгам ебучим ии появился? прекрасно наверное будем меньше работать и меньше уставать? но выдавать такой же результат? нихуя надо работать больше, быстрее, выше, сильнее чтоб …
custom 53797724102936617776
Прохождение капч исторически было одним из «двигателей» AI/ML, уже более 20 лет работы в этом направлении ведут спамеры, SE-оптимизаторы и прочие странные личности. Спустя время наработки попадают в публичное пространство и двигают официальную ML-инженерию. Но когда на днях один из моих агентов регистрировался на очередном ресурсе и прислал мне требование пройти за него капчу, я задумался что роли как-то незаметно …
custom 53800551866454623654
Переходите на vk.ru. Здесь всё тот же ВКонтакте, но быстрее и надёжнее, чем vk.com. Подробности 👇 • Это какой-то другой сервис? Нет, только домен: com → ru. Все возможности, приложения и дизайн ВКонтакте на vk.ru прежние. Однако из-за технических нюансов vk.ru всегда доступен, а ещё открывается и работает быстрее, чем vk.com • Как проверить, я пользуюсь vk.ru или vk.com? Взгляните на адресную строку браузера — на…
custom 53818392602256451739custom 53800551866454623654
НЕПРИЯТНО ДА, КОГДА ПОДДЕРЖКА НЕ ОТВЕЧАЕТ И ПРИХОДИТСЯ ГАЛОЧКОЙ В ТВИТТЕРЕ СВЕТИТЬ???
custom 53800551866454623653
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53797351643372690394custom 53800551866454623652
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53800551866454623655custom 53797724102936617771
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53797724102936617776
Недавно дал почитать Клоду свой старый пет-проект. Он расписал про то, какое у меня хорошее разделение сущностей, как автор этого кода вложился в него душой, как много у меня фич. При этом этот код я писал тогда без ИИ. Я аж всплакнул
custom 53797724102936617778custom 53800551866454623652
Guess whos back https://railway.com/peace/#film
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gdemoikod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“где мой код?” (@gdemoikod), 221 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gdemoikod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.