Channel
@gdhgfbng
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
418subscribers
+61 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003828452034 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gdhgfbng |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gdhgfbng |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:36 | 418 | +35 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 383 | +26 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 357 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 August 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 120 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】小兰 【联系方式】@djhexk12 【验证留名】hsuwb 【验证日期】9.1 【上课价位】600p 【人照几分】8 （服务过程）本人喜欢骚的。做起来舒服。果断约课老师。遥控上楼。老师一见面就抱着我摸着我的二弟。鼻吸在我耳朵痒痒的。好舒服。二弟立马起反应了。真是个骚货。一起去洗澡。老师来了一个水中萧。深喉。感觉进入了喉管。我草。这才是深喉啊。爽。憋不住差点。草草洗完澡。去了房间。刚躺下。老师立马把我的二弟。含在嘴里。上下吞吐。我都打冷颤了。我都让老师开始了。怕憋不住。直接出水。直接进入，老师一直浪叫，很动情。大奶子。特别有视觉冲击力。后入。直接抓住老师手。好像骑马。实在扛不住了。老司机丢脸了。总体评价。人照一致。够骚够浪。做爱就应该这样。畅快淋漓。必须好评 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量…
开课啦宝子们
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】#小兰 【联系方式】@djhexk12 【验证留名】望远镜 【验证日期】8🈷️23 【上课价位】600p 【人照几分】9 【服务过程】开门的那一刻就被老师深深吸引住了，瞬间有一种初恋的感觉，真的很嫩很幼，小巧玲珑，进去之后聊了几句就一起沐浴，洗完了会先给我擦拭身体很贴心，后面就跟着她到了卧室，躺在床上舌吻了一番就开始由上到下，口的时候很有感觉过了一会儿老二就立起来了，后面有点把持不住了就直接戴套进入小穴，太粉嫩了，里面很紧磨到很有感觉，然后背对着我摸着她纤细的身材和翘臀就是一顿输出，叫的声音很好听瞬间就让我上头了，完事之后洗完澡在客厅和她闲聊了几句声音很温柔，后面又亲切的给我递上一瓶水，服务好配合度高，还是嫩妹，性价比高，情绪价值到位，可以冲 优点缺点：🐻大，嫩妹，服务好，态度好，配合积极 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避…
❤1
有位可以约宝子们
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】小兰 【联系方式】@djhexk12 【验证留名】许嵩 【验证日期】8.22 【上课价位】600p 【人照几分】10 【服务过程】看到小兰老师，点开频道内挺吸引人的，联系小兰老师看到老师回复，果断预约，开门第一感觉人照相似无误，然后一起洗浴洗得很仔细，洗完就躺床上做服务了，老师热情地为我挑选喜欢的情趣衣服加白丝，口活杠杠的，特别舒服，感觉很强烈，不得不说特别爽，快顶不住了，就直接带上☂️开始冲刺，老师的表情太骚了，非常好的一次出击体验，老师课室很安全，性格非常好，笑起来超甜，性感的外表搭配骚骚的表情，像和女友一般爱爱，特别有保护欲，让人欲罢不能，妆容精致，回去的时候还给了我一个爱的抱抱，真的非常贴心，BB很紧致，下次还要过来 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分…
可以提前预约啦宝宝们
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】小兰 【联系方式】@djhexk12 【验证留名】破晓 【验证日期】8.21 【上课价位】600p 【人照几分】9 【服务过程】见到老师第一感觉就是真嫩，一开口嗲嗲的。交完水费，冲洗一下开始正戏， 口的很好完全无齿感，胸也很软软软软软软手感太好了，之后就是戴上开始冲刺， 可以明显感觉到下面收缩，123之后顺利出货，冲洗一下，不舍告别。 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @guangdongrsbot） 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明)交流主群：https://t.me/Dgx07
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】 小兰 【联系方式】@djhexk12 【验证留名】 乐乐 【验证日期】8.20 【上课价位】 600p 【人照几分】9 【描述过程】：昨天约了，小兰老师，感觉让我回味无穷，今天又约老师，感觉老师服务太顶了，多的也不说了，一个字绝，喜欢的兄弟们，冲啊，推荐程度10分 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @guangdongrsbot） 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明)交流主群：https://t.me/Dgx07
❤1
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】 大朗 【老师艺名】小兰 【联系方式】 @djhexk12 【验证留名】 次卧 【验证日期】 8月19号 【上课价位】 600p 【人照几分】 9 【服务过程】 闲来无事看到薇薇老师果断出击 老师身材很好 人很漂亮 皮肤很白 性格很开朗 老师主动陪浴 还有水中萧 感觉太棒了服务过程中也很有耐心 我比较难出 全过程也没喊累费劲 这个情绪价值给的太到位了 兄弟们闭眼冲 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @guangdongrsbot） 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明)交流主群：https://t.me/Dgx07
有位可以约宝子们
可以提前预约啦 🔥🔥🔥联系： @djhexk12 🌹🌹🌹双向： @djhexk12bot
有位可以约宝宝们
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gdhgfbng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小兰的朋友圈” (@gdhgfbng), 418 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gdhgfbng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.