Channel
@geoengineering11
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
825subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001502210656 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @geoengineering11 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/geoengineering11 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:42 | 825 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 824 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 823 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 822 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 820 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 819 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What we are experiencing is 6th Generation Warfare https://open.substack.com/pub/thewinepress/p/mockingbird-20-cia-compromised-podcasts 🚨This is also relevant to chemtrails! We all here know that it is the fuel of all planes that is dirty (see why here: https://t.me/geoengineering11/1110 & https://t.me/geoengineering11/1700 ) and that the engine modifications have the effect that the fuel particles, heavy metal…
Video, posted without a caption
Geoengineering Research™️ pinned an audio file
Geoengineering Research™️ pinned a video
1. THE 'REAL' DISCLOSURE IS HAPPENING - It's real this time and EVERYBODY is talking about, and no it is not UFO's. 2. MSAART PLASMOID ENGINE Kerosene Jet Engine Retrofits Full Presentation And here the live test results with professional equipment @ Cosmic Summet 2024 link This is 💯 real, and if someone wants real solutions for our pollution from all engines, this is surely one of them 👍👌🥂
Geoengineering Research™️ pinned a video
Geoengineering Research™️ pinned «Fascinating reading... This ether technology can be used to make rain AND clean up smog pollution! If only there is someone who can make these things...»
@Jim Lee @ClimateViewer does it again, just listen to the intro video <2 mins and see if it doesn’t spark your interest! Jim Lee on Toxic Jet Fuel, Sulfur Pollution and Geoengineering https://decentralize.tv/Posts/2026-07-10-jim-lee-on-toxic-jet-fuel-sulfur-pollution-geoengineering.html
The Fight Against Geoengineering Has Missed the Target — So We Took It to the EPA A landmark Petition for Rulemaking is now on the federal record. Here’s what it says, why it matters, and what you can do in the next five minutes. https://www.climateviewer.news/p/the-fight-against-geoengineering
5 Earthquakes in One Day… Is the Next BIG One Coming? Geophysicist Stefan Burns Explains In a single day, the ground ruptured across California, Japan, and Venezuela — including a rare and devastating "doublet" in Venezuela, where two major quakes struck just 39 seconds apart and the second was bigger than the first. Why is this happening? And what if some of it isn't entirely natural? To make sense of it all, Neal…
Technology is on the cusp of allowing humans to disrupt or steer natural disasters, like hurricanes, according to a new study, which appeared in the journal PLOS Water on June 24. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/weather/2026/06/27/study-cloud-seeding-disrupt-hurricanes/90655884007/
For nearly twenty years, I believed what many of you believed: that the streaks I was seeing in the sky were intentional. Purposeful. A secret spray program designed to sicken, manipulate, or worse. I was in the anti-geoengineering movement before most people had even heard the term. I spoke about it. I spread it. I believed it. Then I decided to take it to court three years ago. That’s when the whole narrative sta…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @geoengineering11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Geoengineering Research™️” (@geoengineering11), 825 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geoengineering11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.