Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bekmurz!

Channel

Bekmurz!

@georbekm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

693subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001151678329
TypeChannel
Username@georbekm
Created1 December 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/georbekm

Growth

688693690.57 August 2026 — 688 subscribers8 August 2026 — 688 subscribers15 August 2026 — 690 subscribers29 August 2026 — 692 subscribers6 September 2026 — 693 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 687–694 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 18:00693+1
29 Aug 2026, 21:47692+2
15 Aug 2026, 16:34690+2
8 Aug 2026, 02:20688no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:28688first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

352 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15142.9%
🔥9627.3%
🤝246.82%
😎205.68%
👌133.69%
💔123.41%
113.13%
❤‍🔥113.13%
😁41.14%
🍌30.852%
🍾20.568%
🕊20.568%
💋10.284%
🙏10.284%
🤪10.284%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 352 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2025 to 6 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Apr 2026, 10:51 UTC≈1,020 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ща в основном тут бываю https://t.me/skrytyigem

6😎3

1 Apr 2026, 08:33 UTC≈1,140 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/VkU5TF-OxPQ?si=FL69t-RxMROwnEjX Ого!

7

31 Mar 2026, 21:40 UTC952 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/RKPWWQmXqa4?si=CUpaGadjwsYSH8IH Мы бэтмен

7

27 Feb 2026, 18:41 UTC≈1,040 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Че бы выбрали троить или шестерить?

4

10 Jan 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,470 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ехал в поезде с 8-ми летним мальчишкой, который строит в майнкрафте замки с ловушками и пишет рассказы Почитайте

32💔12❤‍🔥7😁4

3 Jan 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,240 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/S48dTsUPs70?si=o84lDo54CIDok8oo

🔥124

12 Dec 2025, 16:54 UTC≈1,290 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Жим -120кг А вы говорите «когда стримы?»

🤝236

30 Oct 2025, 15:28 UTC≈1,520 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://youtu.be/pvAGFCr-y20?si=e_0qzlfDdTZ0mGql

😎103

18 Oct 2025, 13:55 UTC≈1,170 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вы не обратили внимания, А игровая индустрия была побеждена

13🍾2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @georbekm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HUGA Stand Up
@HUGA_STANDUP · 29,100
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bekmurz!” (@georbekm), 693 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/georbekm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.