Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gersuss

Channel

Gersuss

@geraysss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

109subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002098213607
TypeChannel
Username@geraysss
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/geraysss

Growth

1081121106 August 2026 — 112 subscribers9 August 2026 — 112 subscribers15 August 2026 — 111 subscribers22 August 2026 — 108 subscribers28 August 2026 — 109 subscribers1096 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107–113 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 04:58109+1
22 Aug 2026, 05:48108-3
15 Aug 2026, 00:15111-1
9 Aug 2026, 06:31112no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:05112first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52828884407010242971121.2%
custom 5451726598698975119917.3%
917.3%
custom 5265140656581405337815.4%
custom 5442713094432255398815.4%
💘59.62%
🍓23.85%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC53 viewsread 9 August 2026

ПОКУПАЕМ🔔🔔🔔ХИНАТАЗИН🔔🔔🔔🔔ПОКУПАЕМ СРОЧНО🔔🔔🔔ХИНАТАЗИН🔔🔔🔔

17 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC61 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @HajimeHinataZinePhoto

★ Похоже, что настало время ПРЕДЗАКАЗОВ ★ Нам не терпится продемонстрировать нашу работу над всеобъемлющим Хаджиме Хинатой, его прошлым, настоящим и будущим 🍊 Что вас ожидает? ★ 50+ страниц с иллюстрациями ★ 4 истории о Хинате внутри зина ★ Формат А5, мягкая обложка ★ Разнообразный мерч: от обычных стикерпаков до объемного коврика для мышки и фигурки ★ Выгодные наборы мерча Для оформления заказа вам нужно заполнит

2

8 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC477 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ой ой спойлеры к #hajimehinatazine Вот это ничего себе конечно 🔈

6custom 52651406565814053376custom 54427130944322553984custom 52828884407010242972custom 54517265986989751192🍓1

5 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC93 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @HajimeHinataZinePhoto

❂ Зачем Gersuss кинула кокос в Хинату? 𖤓 。𖦹°‧ ⋆𖤓 。𖦹°‧ ⋆𖤓 。𖦹°‧ ⋆ – Почему тебе нравится Хаджиме Хината? – Как по мне Хаджиме является нестандартным главным героем. Его умение не поддаваться нахлынувшим эмоциям и рационально размышлять в любой ситуации делает его абсолютно зрелой личностью, пусть даже и со своими тараканами🤲🏽 Очень редко можно встретить персонажа- реалиста, который не отталкивает других при первой же

💘4custom 52828884407010242972custom 54517265986989751191

3 Jul 2026, 20:42 UTC96 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

КОММИШКИ Всем привета За это лето хочу немного поднакопить, поэтому беру кмм на скетч и фул арты, цены представлены ниже 😒Аккуратный скетч: Хэд- 200р Халф-350р Фул-500р Фон только простой-бесплатно Доп перс+100% от суммы Дедлайн 2 недели в порядке очереди 🙂Цветные полноценки: Хэд-500р Халф-1000р Фул-1500р Доп перс+100% от суммы Дедлайн месяц в порядке очереди Фон от 50р в зависимости от сложности Оплата на сбер НЕ Р

custom 52828884407010242977custom 54517265986989751196custom 54427130944322553984custom 526514065658140533721🍓1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @geraysss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gersuss” (@geraysss), 109 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geraysss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.