получил загранник с серией №67 (SIX-SEVEN)👀 это W ?
custom 54408711418727702005custom 52359600689517810453custom 54561152993612351903

Channel
@gerouch8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
137subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001635601796 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gerouch8 |
| Created | 5 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gerouch8 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 137 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 139 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 138 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 138 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
378 reactions across 19 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 67 | 17.7% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 13.2% | |
| custom 5456574066292955837 | 30 | 7.94% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 7.14% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 4.76% | |
| 💔 | 18 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5235974122084772359 | 16 | 4.23% | |
| 😍 | 14 | 3.70% | |
| 😱 | 14 | 3.70% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 3.17% | |
| 🕊 | 11 | 2.91% | |
| 💩 | 10 | 2.65% | |
| custom 5456115299361235190 | 9 | 2.38% | |
| custom 5438217719667237508 | 8 | 2.12% | |
| 🗿 | 8 | 2.12% | |
| custom 5440798836098342707 | 7 | 1.85% | |
| custom 5458370788551825969 | 7 | 1.85% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 1.85% | |
| custom 5440401156486483437 | 6 | 1.59% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 1.59% | |
| 11 further kinds | 33 | 8.73% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 378 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gerouch8. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 April 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
получил загранник с серией №67 (SIX-SEVEN)👀 это W ?
custom 54408711418727702005custom 52359600689517810453custom 54561152993612351903
Франция вернула свой праймовый 1940-й (мастера вайт флага)🥰
custom 54407988360983427077custom 54583707885518259697custom 54561152993612351906custom 52355944212060039191custom 52359741220847723591
думал, что забил победный, но я оказался Гордоном из сб. Англии🫡 чел, кстати, забавно отлетел от меня😎 сыграл в стенку со штангой (нет, не задумывал так)
🔥9🤩6❤4😁2❤🔥1
аргентинцы - молодцы, но рейд босс в финале в виде Испании так играть не будет (круть-верть у них очень хороший на поле) думаю, изи ЧМ для спэниш бойс 🇪🇸
👍6🔥6😁4💯2
откуда в метро столько niggers ?😱
😁6😱6custom 54565740662929558375
сильно заметно, что мне наступили на руку ? ну точно не перелом (надеюсь)😺
custom 54382177196672375086🤯5custom 52359741220847723595👎2
это я игру отбегал👅 сейчас я уже дома еду на вторую🤪
❤9🔥7😁5🍓4
настроение дня: работать под кис-кис😎
🥰6❤🔥4🔥4💯1🤩1custom 54404011564864834371
рабочий вайб каждого понедельника😪
😁8😍6custom 54565740662929558374❤3
не поверите, но на озвучку этого видео я потратил ровно 52 секунды и два кислородных баллона (не мало)🥺 3 игры за выходные - 3 победы, небывалая роскошь, а завтра на работу 🔫
🔥9❤6👍6
R.I.P.🥀
💔10🕊7custom 54565740662929558376
потерял 3 литра крови😪
😱8😢6custom 54565740662929558376
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @gerouch8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“callmegera” (@gerouch8), 137 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gerouch8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.