Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Руманга «Исчезни» | ЧИТАТЬ

Channel

Руманга «Исчезни» | ЧИТАТЬ

@get_lost_read

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,149subscribers

+283 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002176642653
TypeChannel
Username@get_lost_read
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held53
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/get_lost_read

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,86613,15313,009.57 August 2026 — 12,866 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,867 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,871 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,878 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,875 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,872 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,878 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,886 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,893 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,898 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,900 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,895 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,898 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,899 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,910 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,914 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,913 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,909 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,901 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,903 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,905 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,903 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,899 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,912 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,921 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,933 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,941 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,947 subscribers25 September 2026 — 12,935 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,926 subscribers8 October 2026 — 12,935 subscribers12 October 2026 — 13,107 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,124 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,136 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,139 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,141 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,143 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,145 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,147 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,143 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,141 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,143 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,141 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,143 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,146 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,147 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,153 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,149 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,148 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,145 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,146 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,147 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,149 subscribers13,1497 August 20264 November 2026
53 measurements spanning 89 days, net +283. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,823–13,196 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 05:5513,149+2
3 Nov 2026, 06:0713,147+1
2 Nov 2026, 03:3413,146+1
1 Nov 2026, 03:5013,145-3
31 Oct 2026, 03:2913,148-1
30 Oct 2026, 05:3113,149-4
29 Oct 2026, 07:4613,153+6
28 Oct 2026, 06:3513,147+1
27 Oct 2026, 04:1013,146+3
26 Oct 2026, 02:4013,143+2
25 Oct 2026, 00:3613,141-2
23 Oct 2026, 21:0613,143+2
22 Oct 2026, 18:2113,141-2
21 Oct 2026, 14:4013,143-4
20 Oct 2026, 13:0613,147+2
19 Oct 2026, 12:0113,145+2
18 Oct 2026, 12:3013,143+2
17 Oct 2026, 14:5613,141+2
16 Oct 2026, 11:5813,139+3
15 Oct 2026, 09:5413,136first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 24 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
89.7%
avg views ÷ 13,149 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,800
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026
Posts held21 (24 January 2025 – 8 October 2026)
Views total11,800
Reactions total1,818
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 05:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
76
Links
76

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

27,457 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15,29455.7%
❤‍🔥8,07029.4%
🔥1,5285.57%
🤩1,5015.47%
🍓7212.63%
🌭1470.535%
🥰1090.397%
🍌640.233%
👍230.084%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,457 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2025 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
764
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 21 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
185
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @get_lost_read. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 January 2025 to 8 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Oct 2026, 12:49 UTC≈11,800 views1,818 reactions26 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Глава 75 "Цена ошибки" ЧИТАТЬ ГЛАВУ 75| РУМАНГА "ИСЧЕЗНИ" ❤️ 💬 Канал руманги "Теряйся отсюда"

❤1,340🤩231❤‍🔥191🔥29🌭27

5 May 2026, 13:10 UTC≈36,400 views2,260 reactions21 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Глава 74 "Лишний" ЧИТАТЬ ГЛАВУ 74| РУМАНГА "ИСЧЕЗНИ" ❤️ 💬 Канал руманги "Теряйся отсюда"

❤‍🔥1,580❤411🤩194🔥40🍓35

13 Dec 2025, 10:42 UTC≈61,700 views3,020 reactions69 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Глава 73 "Приятного аппетита" ЧИТАТЬ ГЛАВУ 73| РУМАНГА "ИСЧЕЗНИ" ❤️ 💬 Канал руманги "Теряйся отсюда"

❤2,080🤩440🔥304❤‍🔥119🍓77

5 Oct 2025, 09:47 UTC≈75,400 views3,133 reactions69 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Глава 72 "Капризные желания" ЧИТАТЬ ГЛАВУ 72| РУМАНГА "ИСЧЕЗНИ" ❤️ 💬 Канал руманги "Теряйся отсюда"

❤‍🔥2,160❤478🔥301🤩112🍓82

23 Aug 2025, 09:46 UTC≈78,600 views2,930 reactions73 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Глава 71 "Не просто знакомый" ЧИТАТЬ ГЛАВУ 71| РУМАНГА "ИСЧЕЗНИ" ❤️ 💬 Канал руманги "Теряйся отсюда"

❤2,030❤‍🔥542🔥259🍓56🥰43

2 Jun 2025, 10:29 UTC≈80,700 views2,943 reactions50 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Глава 70 "Давай просто помолчим" ЧИТАТЬ ГЛАВУ 70| РУМАНГА "ИСЧЕЗНИ" ❤️ 💬 Канал руманги "Теряйся отсюда"

❤2,080❤‍🔥546🍓225🥰49🔥43

30 Mar 2025, 10:58 UTC≈78,600 views2,875 reactions185 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Глава 69 "Знак равенства" ЧИТАТЬ ГЛАВУ 69| РУМАНГА "ИСЧЕЗНИ" ❤️ 💬 Канал руманги "Теряйся отсюда"

❤1,840❤‍🔥566🤩313🔥79🍓77

1 Feb 2025, 12:03 UTC≈75,400 views2,020 reactions121 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Глава 68 "Горькая правда - сладкая ложь" ЧИТАТЬ ГЛАВУ 68| РУМАНГА "ИСЧЕЗНИ" ❤️ 💬 Канал руманги "Теряйся отсюда"

❤1,340❤‍🔥395🤩197🍓54🌭34

24 Jan 2025, 19:48 UTC≈64,600 views920 reactions15 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Глава 67 "Лучший друг" ЧИТАТЬ ГЛАВУ 67| РУМАНГА "ИСЧЕЗНИ" ❤️ 💬 Канал руманги "Теряйся отсюда"

❤666❤‍🔥162🌭60👍17🔥15

24 Jan 2025, 19:44 UTC≈55,500 views688 reactions12 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Глава 66 "13" ЧИТАТЬ ГЛАВУ 66| РУМАНГА "ИСЧЕЗНИ" 💔 💬 Канал руманги "Теряйся отсюда"

❤479❤‍🔥129🔥49🍓18🌭13

24 Jan 2025, 19:35 UTC≈46,300 views552 reactions15 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Глава 65 "Святой Валентин" ЧИТАТЬ ГЛАВУ 65| РУМАНГА "ИСЧЕЗНИ" ❤️ 💬 Канал руманги "Теряйся отсюда"

❤383❤‍🔥99🔥44🍌17🍓9

24 Jan 2025, 19:31 UTC≈38,700 views483 reactions18 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Глава 64 "Внутренний демон" ЧИТАТЬ ГЛАВУ 64| РУМАНГА "ИСЧЕЗНИ" ❤️ 💬 Канал руманги "Теряйся отсюда"

❤330❤‍🔥94🍌41🔥11🍓7

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @get_lost_read. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Руманга «Исчезни» | ЧИТАТЬ” (@get_lost_read), 13,149 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/get_lost_read.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.