Channel
@getrektordietrying
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
524subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001873882646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @getrektordietrying |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/getrektordietrying |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 524 | +19 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 505 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 507 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 506 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 509 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:19 | 509 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
210 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 61 | 29.0% | |
| 🤣 | 59 | 28.1% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 11.0% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 8.57% | |
| 😭 | 13 | 6.19% | |
| 🏆 | 10 | 4.76% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.86% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 2.86% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 2.38% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.476% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/HollanderAdam/status/2082543134794281061?s=20 Аплодисменты Адаму и ОС в частности. Наняли олда на маркетинг. Олд засадил всех в ебучие квесты. Обещаний вагон. Выполнил ноль. Высосали из паствы денег. Теперь личное решение уйти. Спасибо блядь за игру.
🤣15
#мысли $YOLO - 2.8кк Первый действительно интересный мне новый мем за долгое время, который появился на робингуде. Да были кешкет, который лично мне не нравится с позиции культа и лора(его там нет) и тендис, который я пропустил, там все классно, но сейчас дорого относительно кепки этого. https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x52fcb1d83191e06ef2d2d9f460609ca22a923558 Тут все в порядке с культом, лором, кт шиллерами …
👍10
И кстати фан факт. В 22 году, когда рубль летом-осенью был ниже 60, ру фонда тоже на лоях - крипторынок в это же время формировал дно. Дальше отскок выше по всем фронтам и бычий забег. Сейчас примерно такая же история - рынок РФ валится вниз, бакс дешевый, крипта в очке. Возможно сила одного из рынков в этот раз также покажет направление для другого, если паттерн повторится.
🥰4😁2
#мысли Part 2. 6. Это вызовет бурный рост топ-10 с дальнейшим перетоком ликвидности ниже. 7. Есть два сценария для рынка крипты - либо дно уже поставлено и нас ждет отскок с последующим крашем в +/- ту же зону 57к - либо мы уйдем по бтс сильно ниже, что может быть в реверс с остальным рынком. 8. Последние года 2-3 идея холдить что-то кроме бтс в кругах энтузиастов вызывает усмешку. Раньше тоже придерживались этог…
❤12
#мысли Part 1. В догонку отправляю мою писанину недельной давности, которую в итоге закончил и зафиналю мой вижн на рынок, вдруг кто-то видит в этой писанине смысл. Чем дольше продолжается нисходящий чоп на рынке, тем больше участники рынка сходятся во мнении, что дно по бтс будет в районе 50к. Даже делулу быки постепенно переключаются на этот фон и вот уже все повторяют, как мантру - "У НАС КАЖДЫЙ ЦИКЛ БЫВАЕТ СО…
❤9🔥1😁1
#мысли Есть у меня боль последние полгода - отсутствие эджа и понимания рынка. Я как бы не спорю, что практически не дегеню от слова совсем пару месяцев, но когда надо сделать lock in - все мимо проходит и/или страшно что-то купить. Плюс добила частичная ликвидация моих позиций. А остатки под водой. Такая череда может быть у любого трейдера - тут главное в фомо не попасть и не натворить хуйни. Поэтому пока понаб…
❤23❤🔥5💔4🫡1
Я теперь в секте ждущих второго дропа от хл и дропа от бейз 😂
Sticker, posted without a caption
Лан ребятки плата за тупость и меня настигла. Лонги на хл ликвидированы, залоговый эфир почти весь спизжен. Вен боттом сука?
😭13😁3🤣1
> “Mommy, how did we get so poor?” > “Your Dad is a complete retard with unlimited risk tolerance.”
🤣11😢6
Етн больше не топ2 актив по кмк. Да, не на то ставочка была сделана, не на то 🙂
😁8
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣19😁6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @getrektordietrying. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GETREKTORDIETRYING” (@getrektordietrying), 524 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/getrektordietrying.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.