7 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC202 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
小甜 ，好评，品质甚比大圈 👉 评价1 评价2 评价3 评价4 评价5 评价6 评价7 评价8 评价9 评价10 评价11 评价12 评价13 评价14 评价15 评价16 评价17 评价18 评价19 评价20 评价21 👉 妹子详情资料点这里
Channel
广佛好评集合圈
@gf85853
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,407subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003160810737 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gf85853 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gf85853 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 2,407 | -16 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 2,423 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 2,431 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 2,439 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 2,443 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 2,444 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 2,441 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 2,439 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 2,444 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 2,447 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 2,451 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
7 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC290 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
小曼 ，好评多多，皮肤白 👉 评价 评价2 评价3 👉 妹子详情资料点这里
6 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC551 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
小悦 反馈 👉 评价1 评价2 👉 妹子详情资料点这里
4 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC779 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo
小萝 反馈 👉 评价1 评价2 评价3 评价4 评价5 👉 妹子详情资料点这里
4 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC812 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
可可 反馈 👉 评价 评价2 评价3 评价4 评价5 评价6 评价7 评价8 👉 妹子详情资料点这里
3 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC184 viewsread 7 August 2026
♥♥♥♥ @gfs663 私聊限制了 私聊双向🤖 @gfs669Bot
3 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC707 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
小悦 反馈 👉 评价1 评价2 👉 妹子详情资料点这里
2 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
熟客户想回佛山点我家的妹子 说东莞上门太差了 品控好不好 还得看顾客 信任 和 评价
2 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
夕夕 反馈 👉 评价1 评价2 评价3 评价4 👉 妹子详情资料点这里
1 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
小思 ，再次好评，品控质量 👉 评价 评价2 评价3 评价4 评价5 评价6 评价7 评价8 评价9 评价10 👉 妹子详情资料点这里
31 Jul 2026, 09:19 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
颜颜 ，反馈 👉 评价 评价2 评价3 评价4 评价5 👉 妹子详情资料点这里
30 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTC494 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
小萌 ， 反馈 👉 评价1 评价2 👉 妹子详情资料点这里
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @gf85853. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广佛好评集合圈” (@gf85853), 2,407 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gf85853.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.