Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚清一色

Channel

东南亚清一色

@ggb6998

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32,717subscribers

+32,561 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004325277917
TypeChannel
Username@ggb6998
Description白班 @guo9166 晚班 @pdx1916 商务 @yt1368
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ggb6998

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15632,71716,436.52 September 2026 — 156 subscribers2 September 2026 — 637 subscribers11 September 2026 — 32,306 subscribers13 September 2026 — 32,462 subscribers15 September 2026 — 32,616 subscribers17 September 2026 — 32,717 subscribers2 September 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 15 days, net +32,561. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 08:2132,717+101
15 Sept 2026, 06:5932,616+154
13 Sept 2026, 12:5932,462+156
11 Sept 2026, 19:5932,306+31,669
2 Sept 2026, 22:16637+481
2 Sept 2026, 05:00156first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 2 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.85%
avg views ÷ 32,717 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,220
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.492%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held33 (2 September 202621 September 2026)
Views total103,176
Reactions total495
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
125
Videos
141
Links
48

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
55m 16s
Average length
1m 51s

Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

495 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣20541.4%
🤬7515.2%
5210.5%
😁275.45%
💩224.44%
🤯214.24%
🔥163.23%
👍153.03%
👏132.63%
😢132.63%
👎91.82%
😱81.62%
40.808%
🥰40.808%
🌚30.606%
💔30.606%
😨20.404%
🕊10.202%
🤮10.202%
🥱10.202%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 495 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 11:09 UTC≈2,920 views17 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

#掸北腊戌发生少女因感情纠纷群殴事件 9月21日,掸邦北部腊戌市12保辛尼路旁,几名少女因恋爱纠纷结伙殴打一名女孩。周边民众发现后上前劝架,劝架者称打人者曾使用毒品。 此前5月15日,腊戌市7保也曾发生一群学中文的女孩结伙霸凌殴打一名少女事件。 This channel has released this video solely to take a stand against bullying and seek justice for the victims; we firmly oppose violence against children!🫡🫡

🤬132😨2

21 Sept 2026, 08:54 UTC≈2,660 views13 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

缅甸少妇肉嘟嘟的,就是有点黑

👎721🥱1😁1😱1

20 Sept 2026, 18:42 UTC≈3,360 views0 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

道长今天没算出有血光之灾 #打架 #打人 算命 世事难预料 !

20 Sept 2026, 16:38 UTC≈3,910 views18 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

#仰光一群青年围殴一人 视频曝光引担忧 据Democratic Press接获投稿,仰光德贡区Rainbow Water Land发生一起斗殴事件,一群青年围殴一人至倒地。 参与者疑似为该媒体读者熟悉的面孔。目前,事件发生时间及伤者情况尚不清楚。

🤣18

20 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC≈3,960 views16 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

#吃瓜 🇨🇳芒市空间一号ktv的骚逼

7🔥3😁3👏2🌚1

20 Sept 2026, 06:58 UTC≈3,840 views13 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

#佤邦曼相 矿山小鸡抢客打架

👏4🔥3😁311🥰1

19 Sept 2026, 19:04 UTC≈5,090 views45 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

#网友投稿 现在敲键盘太过于压抑,业绩业绩没有, 工资发了就去耍掉了,小姐姐的手没碰太久,欲望起来,男的都不发过。😂😂

🤣33💩7💔32

19 Sept 2026, 11:08 UTC≈5,210 views3 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

#网友吐槽 凌晨3点,金边旧波成东机场附近,两名年轻女子因为一个男生在街头打了起来。 两人先是互相拉扯,随后扭打成一团,直接滚进泥地,最后浑身都是泥。

2👍1

19 Sept 2026, 04:28 UTC≈5,180 views16 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

#大其力 阿瓦美女做爱视频曝光

🔥5🤣4👍2👏2🥰2💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @ggb6998. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚清一色” (@ggb6998), 32,717 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ggb6998.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.