Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GGSTANDOFF REVIEWS | ОТЗЫВЫ ️

Channel

GGSTANDOFF REVIEWS | ОТЗЫВЫ ️

@ggstandofffeedback

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

43,126subscribers

+1,955 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002736534209
TypeChannel
Username@ggstandofffeedback
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ggstandofffeedback

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

40,93743,12642,031.57 August 2026 — 41,171 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,147 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,096 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,064 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,055 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,058 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,042 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,047 subscribers15 August 2026 — 40,993 subscribers17 August 2026 — 41,018 subscribers18 August 2026 — 41,034 subscribers19 August 2026 — 41,024 subscribers20 August 2026 — 40,975 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,937 subscribers23 August 2026 — 41,077 subscribers24 August 2026 — 41,066 subscribers25 August 2026 — 41,087 subscribers26 August 2026 — 41,090 subscribers27 August 2026 — 41,106 subscribers28 August 2026 — 41,145 subscribers29 August 2026 — 41,162 subscribers30 August 2026 — 41,269 subscribers31 August 2026 — 41,260 subscribers1 September 2026 — 41,352 subscribers2 September 2026 — 41,365 subscribers3 September 2026 — 42,012 subscribers5 September 2026 — 42,417 subscribers8 September 2026 — 42,893 subscribers11 September 2026 — 43,126 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 35 days, net +1,955. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,609–43,454 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 14:0143,126+233
8 Sept 2026, 23:1542,893+476
5 Sept 2026, 16:4142,417+405
3 Sept 2026, 17:1642,012+647
2 Sept 2026, 11:4741,365+13
1 Sept 2026, 14:4441,352+92
31 Aug 2026, 14:4741,260-9
30 Aug 2026, 12:2841,269+107
29 Aug 2026, 11:2841,162+17
28 Aug 2026, 12:1441,145+39
27 Aug 2026, 15:2741,106+16
26 Aug 2026, 17:3441,090+3
25 Aug 2026, 14:3541,087+21
24 Aug 2026, 18:0741,066-11
23 Aug 2026, 04:0241,077+140
21 Aug 2026, 15:2940,937-38
20 Aug 2026, 10:3640,975-49
19 Aug 2026, 10:1741,024-10
18 Aug 2026, 09:4241,034+16
17 Aug 2026, 11:1841,018first reading

Engagement

427 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.30%
avg views ÷ 43,126 subscribers
Avg views / post
994
349 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
349
of 427 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 322 of 349 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held427 (5 August 202611 September 2026)
Views total346,902
Reactions total1,385
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 16s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,571 reactions across 376 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,06567.8%
👍925.86%
❤‍🔥573.63%
🏆553.50%
🔥523.31%
😎422.67%
💘301.91%
🥰231.46%
👏181.15%
🐳140.891%
🥴120.764%
😢90.573%
👌80.509%
🤝80.509%
🤣80.509%
🗿70.446%
😭70.446%
🤔70.446%
60.382%
💯60.382%
16 further kinds452.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 382 of the 427 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,571 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 427 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Sept 2026, 12:50 UTC221 views2 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

GG як всегда на висоти закинув 500 руб а подняв 2400 юси дай пришло моментально Id: 7220887 #GGSTAND #PUBGM

2

11 Sept 2026, 12:33 UTC435 views4 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

закинул 15р на пробу , и выбил многообещающие вещи , честно не ожидал было приятно выбить, четкий сайт , всем добра и позитива и таких же лутов ID: 6306613 Админ: Со2 - Забрал Пабг - Забрал✔️

4

11 Sept 2026, 12:01 UTC591 views4 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

ну гг дает жестко деп был 70 решил закинуть просто покрутить что нибудь а тут такое как всегда лучшие, айди 893372 👉🏻 ТВОЙ БОНУС ЗДЕСЬ

4

10 Sept 2026, 21:54 UTC≈1,390 views15 reactionsread 11 September 2026

🛠 ТЕХНИЧЕСКИЕ РАБОТЫ В 01:00 сайт временно уйдёт на технические работы. ⏱ Ориентировочное время работ — до 60 минут. Планируем вернуться в строй примерно к 02:00. Скоро будем снова онлайн 💚 UPD: 01:15 все работает в штатном режиме

9😭6

10 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,880 views9 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Video

Я просто в шоке что вытворяет ггстенд, я сделал батл на 2800 рублей а забрал 15к, спасибо ггстенд вы лучшие, x5 с батла! ID: 2818544 #GGVID Админ: просто вау, бро!🥳 🟢 ГОУ ЗА ИКСАМИ

9

10 Sept 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,710 views9 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Я в афиге… решил покрутить кейсы и открыл Легу и тут падает такая имба, сайт топовый Айди 11702861 Админ: седня отзывы оч жесткие 😍

9

10 Sept 2026, 11:35 UTC≈1,470 views8 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Закинул 50₽, слил до 10 и в апгрейде поднял до 70. Крутил кейсы блогеров и тут мне повезло Сайт крут, советую Id: 9662704 ⚡️ ЛОВИ СВОЙ ЗАНОС НА GG

7👏1

10 Sept 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,350 views4 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

закинул 200руб, по открывал кейсики и сделал контракт за 600+-г в итоге выпал калаш за 2к, ггшка как всегда лучшая 1563017 👉🏻 ТВОЙ БОНУС ЗДЕСЬ

4

10 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,190 views4 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

GGSTANDOFF Лучшие!! Деп был всего 200 рублей, в планах было подняться до 600 голды, но ггшка решила что этого будет мало) Спасибо огромное! 15502672 ⚡️ ХОЧЕШЬ ТАК ЖЕ? ЖМИ!

4

10 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTC≈1,150 views7 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Жирный окуп как с кейса так и с апгрейда. ID: 12455684 Админ: ты реально Монстр, бро😈 🟢 ГОУ ЗА ИКСАМИ

5🔥2

10 Sept 2026, 09:40 UTC≈1,130 views3 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Крутанул барабан,не на что не надеялся, потом выпал кейс бесплатный,а а него вот такая вкусняшка. Спасибо ggs,за поднятие вечернего настроения id: 7965508 #GGSTAND #STANDOFF

2🤣1

10 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTC≈1,160 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

GGSTANDOFF лучшие, вернулся в стандофф, скинов нет, думаю закину 2.500 открою кейс на весь балик, а тут такой улов, лучшие просто! ID: 14303789 Админ: че за улов, брат?🤯 ⚡️ ЛОВИ СВОЙ ЗАНОС НА GG

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 427 posts we hold for @ggstandofffeedback. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GGSTANDOFF REVIEWS | ОТЗЫВЫ ️” (@ggstandofffeedback), 43,126 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ggstandofffeedback.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.