Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Staff Group | GH

Bot

Staff Group | GH

@ghStaffBot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

11,862monthly users

-1,265 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID239226622
TypeBot
Username@ghStaffBot
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ghStaffBot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,86213,12712,494.56 August 2026 — 13,127 monthly users8 August 2026 — 12,751 monthly users10 August 2026 — 12,724 monthly users12 August 2026 — 12,903 monthly users13 August 2026 — 12,895 monthly users17 August 2026 — 12,856 monthly users18 August 2026 — 12,845 monthly users20 August 2026 — 12,845 monthly users20 August 2026 — 12,538 monthly users24 August 2026 — 12,608 monthly users25 August 2026 — 12,415 monthly users28 August 2026 — 12,365 monthly users31 August 2026 — 11,995 monthly users3 September 2026 — 12,109 monthly users8 September 2026 — 11,936 monthly users11 September 2026 — 11,862 monthly users6 August 202611 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 36 days, net -1,265. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,672–13,317 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)Monthly usersChange
11 Sept 2026, 01:1911,862-74
8 Sept 2026, 01:1811,936-173
3 Sept 2026, 06:1712,109+114
31 Aug 2026, 03:0711,995-370
28 Aug 2026, 05:4712,365-50
25 Aug 2026, 09:5712,415-193
24 Aug 2026, 09:0312,608+70
20 Aug 2026, 13:1212,538-307
20 Aug 2026, 10:2312,845no change
18 Aug 2026, 17:4612,845-11
17 Aug 2026, 20:1812,856-39
13 Aug 2026, 23:3412,895-8
12 Aug 2026, 20:0412,903+179
10 Aug 2026, 22:2212,724-27
8 Aug 2026, 01:0512,751-376
6 Aug 2026, 01:4613,127first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Staff Group | GH” (@ghStaffBot), 11,862 monthly users as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghStaffBot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.