Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for «غریق!»

Channel

«غریق!»

@gharighll

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,209subscribers

+1,068 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004329602313
TypeChannel
Username@gharighll
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 7 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gharighll

Growth

1411,298719.59 August 2026 — 141 subscribers9 August 2026 — 143 subscribers17 August 2026 — 212 subscribers25 August 2026 — 770 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,165 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,298 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,209 subscribers1,2099 August 20269 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 32 days, net +1,068. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 23:201,209-89
5 Sept 2026, 02:361,298+133
1 Sept 2026, 18:341,165+395
25 Aug 2026, 01:07770+558
17 Aug 2026, 16:35212+69
9 Aug 2026, 16:01143+2
9 Aug 2026, 09:46141first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6481.0%
❤‍🔥78.86%
🍓67.59%
💘22.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC13 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

دوستانِ آفتاب به همدیگه تبریک می‌گن بابت این روز، روزِ دوست‌داران کتاب، و من نیشم تا بناگوش بازه بابت این حسِ قشنگی که بین آفتاب جریان داره :>>

🍓3

9 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC15 viewsread 9 August 2026

روزمون مبارک:))) امیدوارم همینطور با کتاب رفیق بمونیم!

9 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC22 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

فکر می‌کنید دوره‌ی بعدیِ آفتاب قراره به چه صورت باشه؟ دوست‌دارم حدسیاتتون رو بدونم :>> در ناشناس یا دایرکت بگید لطفا!

💘2

9 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC24 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

در موردِ سمفونی مردگان، و شاید هم تمام کتاب‌های عباس معروفی، مهم‌ترین نکته و توصیه‌ای دارم برایتان این است که؛ به‌هیچ عنوان، اگر حالِ روحی‌تان خوب نیست و اکنون زیر فشار روانی و روحی سنگینی هستید، نخوانید!! این کتاب پُر از زخم و غم است -در عین حالِ زیبایی و بی‌نظیر بودنش- آنقدر زیاد که می‌تواند قلبتان را بسوزاند و دلتان بخواهد خون گریه کنید. پس اگر در شرایط و وضعیت درستی نیستید، مخصوصا از لحاظ روحی، سمفونی مردگان را م

3

9 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

امروز کتابِ دیگر را شروع می‌کنم. کتابی که در دوره‌ی آفتاب داریم می‌خوانیم، پیرمرد و دریا! -که احتمال می‌دهم شاید آن‌قدر که انتظارش را داشته‌ام، به دلم ننشیند و دوستش نداشته‌باشم.

🍓3

8 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC38 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

صحبت‌کردن با دوستانِ آفتاب، واقعا برایم لذت‌بخش و خوشایند است! چقدر دوست‌داشتنی و گرم :>>

4

8 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC38 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

و این مکالمه ماندگار است، چرا که بنظرم برای شما عزیزان که مطالعه می‌کنید، می‌تواند مفید باشد :>

5

8 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC36 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

دقیقا و برای همه‌شان امیددارم که بتوانند با زخم‌هایشان روبه‌رو شوند، هرچند که دلشان را بیازارد!

4

8 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC38 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

گفتم، توجیه‌پذیر نیست. اما فکرمی‌کنی کسی که زخم عمیقی که در وجود داره، -زخمی که به‌دلیل نپرداختن بهش و عدم مراجعه به افراد حرفه‌ای، هنوز تازه‌است و حتی چرکین-، متوجه هست که گاهی با حرف‌هاش و عکس‌العمل‌هایش به کسی زخم می‌زند؟ کسی که همواره زخم دیده، روان و روحش با این نوع رفتار اُنس گرفته و عادت داره بهش. انگار که حتی دیگه رفتاری دیگه‌ای جز این مدل رو عادی نمی‌دونه و تنها این روند براش طبیعیه! مثل کسی که فرزند والدینی

4

8 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC36 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

البته که باید بنویسم، این‌ها را نگفته‌ام که زخم‌زدن‌هایشان را توجیه کنم، خیر! قبلا نیز در موضوعات دیگرمان اشاره کرده بودم که زخم زدن و رنجاندن با حالِ روانیِ فرد توجیه نمی‌شود. اما درک، چرا! دانسته‌ها به ما مهلت می‌دهند که بخواهیم درک کنیم.

4

8 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC63 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

و من نیز گاهی فکرمی‌کنم، قلب‌های تیره از عمقِ زخم‌ها خلق شده‌اند! از آن زمانی که کسانی بی‌رحمانه بر قلب‌های زلال و خاکستری‌شان، رنگِ سیاه پاشید. بی‌آنکه فکر کنند تیرگی دامنِ خودشان را هم می‌گیرد، همانطور که به دامن این‌ها حمله‌ورش کردند. و گاهی فکر‌میکنم، قلب‌های تیره از هرقلبی بیشتر به همدم و یار نیازمند است، به کسی که خاکستریِ درونش را نشانش دهد و بگوید: «می‌دانم می‌ترسی بازهم کسی سیاهت کند! می‌دانم می‌ترسی و به هم

4

8 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC42 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

به‌نظرِ من، خوشبختی معنای مطلق و منحصربه‌فردی ندارد! خوشبختی یعنی همان لحظه‌های کوچک و شاید بی‌اهمیتی که حالِ دلت خوب است و تو متوجهشان نیستی! خوشبختی یعنی لبخندی که بر چهره‌ات می‌نشیند و حتی شاید دلیلش گرمای قهوه‌ی درونِ فنجانت باشد! می‌پرسی چرا خود را خوشبخت نمی‌دانی؟ چون معنایی که از خوشبختی در ذهنت ساخته‌ای یک غولِ شاخ‌ و دُم دار است! یک معنای آرمانی. اما بدان که زندگی، از آرمان‌ها به دور است و به روزمرگی‌ها نزدی

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gharighll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“«غریق!»” (@gharighll), 1,209 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gharighll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.