Channel
Ghazaleghafar
@ghazaleghafarr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,895subscribers
-62 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001191874376 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ghazaleghafarr |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ghazaleghafarr |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:28 | 1,895 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:31 | 1,903 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 1,906 | +3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:19 | 1,903 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 1,909 | -1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:04 | 1,910 | -1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:05 | 1,911 | -1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 07:04 | 1,912 | -3 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 01:36 | 1,915 | -3 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 13:41 | 1,918 | -10 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 1,928 | -22 |
| 21 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 1,950 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 1,950 | -7 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 1,957 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Top_books7 · 19,817
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 October 2026
@book_tips · 22,369
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 September 2026
@aramesh13577 · 26,671
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ghazaleghafar” (@ghazaleghafarr), 1,895 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghazaleghafarr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.