Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -3,394. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91,482–96,093 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 08:58
92,166
+152
15 Sept 2026, 23:18
92,014
-275
14 Sept 2026, 02:56
92,289
-499
12 Sept 2026, 09:01
92,788
-63
10 Sept 2026, 07:18
92,851
-543
7 Sept 2026, 02:19
93,394
-1,465
4 Sept 2026, 14:00
94,859
+18
3 Sept 2026, 00:17
94,841
+7
2 Sept 2026, 00:13
94,834
-22
1 Sept 2026, 01:06
94,856
-51
30 Aug 2026, 23:06
94,907
-10
28 Aug 2026, 23:43
94,917
+117
27 Aug 2026, 21:28
94,800
-26
26 Aug 2026, 21:34
94,826
+5
25 Aug 2026, 20:19
94,821
-154
24 Aug 2026, 22:03
94,975
-93
23 Aug 2026, 08:25
95,068
-296
21 Aug 2026, 17:47
95,364
+15
20 Aug 2026, 15:11
95,349
-17
19 Aug 2026, 16:43
95,366
first reading
Engagement
788 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.30%
avg views ÷ 92,166 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,730
457 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
457
of 788 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 456 of 457 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
788 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
3,075,872
Reactions total
33,737
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 00:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,200
Videos
≈7,100
Links
≈13,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 19m
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 239 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
54,251 reactions across 783 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
10,546
19.4%
❤
9,370
17.3%
👍
6,007
11.1%
😡
5,892
10.9%
😱
5,185
9.56%
😁
4,712
8.69%
😢
2,913
5.37%
🔥
2,907
5.36%
🕊
1,944
3.58%
😨
1,709
3.15%
🙏
1,072
1.98%
🙈
837
1.54%
🗿
558
1.03%
🍌
216
0.398%
🤔
205
0.378%
👀
178
0.328%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 785 of the 788 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54,251 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 788 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
50
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 788 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ghest_po_yaroslavski. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 788 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.888%
7 of 788 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
7
posts carrying an erid · 7 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
5,920
over 7 measured posts
Median views · rest
6,950
over 781 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFHKCA9P
1
14 August 2026
14 August 2026
2W5zFHkj7bw
1
8 September 2026
8 September 2026
2W5zFJ2mBY5
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
2W5zFJAPY9w
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
2W5zFJDGB4u
1
23 September 2026
23 September 2026
2W5zFJSnnsb
1
4 September 2026
4 September 2026
2W5zFJvbjSq
1
5 September 2026
5 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 788 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
❗️Один человек погиб и пятеро пострадали в жестком ДТП в Ярославской области
Трагическое происшествие произошло сегодня около 17.21.
27 сентября около 17:25 в Рыбинске на Шекснинском шоссе (у дома №31) произошла авария с трагическим исходом.
По предварительной версии, водитель на неустановленном авто, выезжая со второстепенной дороги (со стороны ГЭС), не уступил дорогу ВАЗ-2107. Чтобы избежать столкновения, 77-лет…
😵В Ярославской области стартует отопительный сезон
Первым к подаче тепла готовится Любимский муниципальный округ.
В Ярославской области в Любиме уже завтра, 28 сентября, начинают пуск отопления. Об этом сообщил глава Любимского муниципального округа Алексей Дмитриев.
«Погода всё чаще напоминает, что зима не за горами. Чтобы в учреждениях и домах было тепло и уютно, мы запускаем отопительный сезон с 28 сентября», —…
Жители Перекопа жалуются на неприспособленность нового детского городка к детям🤨
Речь идет о недавно открытом городке в парке «Рабочий сад».
"Видимо, просто забыли поставить все ступени", - иронизирует подписчица.
"Залезть на качели - целый квест", - пишет жительница района.
Отметим, что экс-мэр Ярославля Артем Молчанов подчеркивал, что городок предназначен для маленьких, а не больших деток и просил правильно его…
🏥Семейная пара из Ярославской области помогла пострадавшей велосипедистке
Свою историю и слова признательности женщина опубликовала в соцсетях.
Жительница Костромы Маргарита сломала руку, упав с велосипеда. На помощь ей пришла супружеская пара из Рыбинска, которая приехала в город на фестиваль фейерверков «Серебряная ладья». На следующий день после фестиваля супруги гуляли по Костроме и уже собирались возвращаться …
✌В Ярославской области жители сказали «да!» магазинным котикам
На пушистых сотрудников в соцсетях написал жалобу покупатель — мол, кошки лежат на продуктах, а это антисанитария.
Он потребовал принять меры и убрать барсиков, однако поддержки не нашёл — скорее, наоборот.
Пушистиков сфотографировал в магазине известной сети-дискаунтера житель Тутаева.
«Не имею ничего против животных, но санитарные правила никто не о…
Зима близко...🥶 Вслед за велосипедистами в Ярославле минувшей ночью провожали сезон массовым заездом и питбайкеры.
Будете скучать?
😱 Жесть Ярославль - подписаться
📸 Прислать новость: @Predlozhka_ghest76
На стройке третьего моста в Ярославле будут соблюдать закон о тишине
Власти обещают проконтролировать соблюдение закона.
Жители Фрунзенского района продолжают жаловаться на шум от стройки в ночное время. Особенно много обращений поступило на этой неделе.
Люди отмечают, что из‑за грохота не удаётся нормально спать: по словам горожан, в ночь с 22 на 23 сентября начиная с трёх часов ночи «аж стёкла дрожали от шума». …
🤬В Ярославской области сотрудница полиции обратилась в суд после нападения собаки
Агрессивный пес укусил представительницу правоохранительных органов за ногу.
Громкая история с нападениями хозяйской собаки на людей разворачивалась весной в Гаврилов-Яме. В конце марта пёс укусил мальчика — ребёнку в ярославской больнице наложили около 14 швов. Позже от зубов собаки пострадала ещё одна женщина, а затем — участковая: …
😡Массовой дракой закончился футбольный матч между подростками из Рыбинска и Владимира
Об инциденте сообщили СМИ.
Игра прошла 24 сентября в рамках 20‑го тура первенства Межрегиональной федерации футбола «Золотое кольцо» среди команд 2010 года рождения. Встреча завершилась минимальной победой хозяев — со счётом 1:0.
Конфликт вспыхнул сразу после финального свистка: ссора между юными футболистами быстро переросла в м…
👊Переломал ребра. Молодой ярославец насмерть забил своего деда
Трагедия произошла 18 сентября во Фрунзенском районе.
В больницу был доставлен 70‑летний мужчина — он поступил с тяжёлыми травмами, а позже скончался. В ходе проверки выяснилось, что к причинению вреда здоровью может быть причастен его 22-летний внук.
Предварительно установлено, что вечером в квартире на улице Калинина между родственниками произошёл бы…
😱54😡28😢8❤5🗿2
Showing the 12 most recent of 788 posts we hold for @ghest_po_yaroslavski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@ghest_po_yaroslavski edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Жесть Ярославль” (@ghest_po_yaroslavski), 92,166 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghest_po_yaroslavski.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.