Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for (Morad gholipour)مراد قلی پور

Channel

(Morad gholipour)مراد قلی پور

@gholipour_valad

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

541subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001008021151
TypeChannel
Username@gholipour_valad
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gholipour_valad

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

534541537.55 August 2026 — 534 subscribers6 August 2026 — 534 subscribers13 August 2026 — 535 subscribers21 August 2026 — 539 subscribers27 August 2026 — 540 subscribers3 September 2026 — 541 subscribers5 August 20263 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 533–542 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 19:20541+1
27 Aug 2026, 14:24540+1
21 Aug 2026, 14:18539+4
13 Aug 2026, 17:46535+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:30534no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:08534first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4543.7%
4038.8%
👏1817.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC32 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

اگر دستگاه فکری استاد شفیعی را در یک پروسه تاریخی بررسی کنیم در می یابیم که امثال حسین منزوی هرگز نمی توانند وارد جریان شناسی های شعر ایشان قرار بگیرند و این هیچ ربطی به شعر خوب یا بد ایشان ندارد بلکه مساله چیزی غیر از این است و از طرفی هم وقتی اخوان در دستگاه فکری استاد در مرتبه ای بالاست پس نباید انتطار داشت که حسین منزوی که کبوتر نامه رسان اخوان به بیت رهبری است در این مرتبه حاصر گردد اگر چه اخوان تاکیدا برا

👍2👏1

6 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC50 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

در جوار استاد علی جهاندار دیروز منزل استاد

2👍2👏1

6 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC48 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

نقد و بررسی کتاب: 🔹 گزاره گردانی در شعر پسانیمایی/ دکتر علی تسلیمی 🔹منتقد: مراد قلی پور 🔹بزودی روزنامه نقد حال

👍4

6 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC49 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

نقد و بررسی کتاب: 🔹 ایرانیان و رویای قرآن پارسی / دکتر محمود فتوحی 🔹منتقد: مراد قلی پور 🔹بزودی روزنامه نقد حال

👍32

4 Aug 2026, 03:40 UTC66 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @gerdehamaeiadabitatePhoto

نشر تازه قبیله جهانی شعر نشر ارزان / سوئد ۴۸۸ صفحه

👍3👏31

3 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC103 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

باید هر چه سریع‌تر ناامید شد. امیدواری ریشه نابسامی و کسالت فجیع سیاسی ماست. حداقل شعر امروز فارسی دیگر چرا "شعر امیدواری" است! امید وار به زبان، به بی‌معنایی و به هر چیزی که دارد دست و پا می زند. اخوان شاید سهوا یا عمدا حداقل زودتر از دیگر شاعران اقرار کرد که:" نا امیدم گرچه امیدم". شاید راز نا امیدی اش در حذف زمان از لایه آخر شعر زمستان باشد که همه فعل ها حذف می شوند و شعر در بی زمانی امتداد می یابد. هوا دلگ

👏6👍4

3 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC69 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Adabiyat_Moaser_IRANPhoto

تقدیم به ”یانیس ریتسوس”شاعر اکسپرسیونیست یونان” ص ۸۴ آمدند بی آنکه از من چیزی بپرسند کتکم زدند لباس هایم را پاره پاره کردند و رفتند دسته ای دیگر آمدند آن ها چیزی از خیاطی نمی دانستند به جای لباسهای پاره پاره ام لبهایم را دوختند مراد قلی پور دارد آقای شعر می میرد چاپ اول ۸۷ چاپ دوم ۹۲ 📚📚📚📚📚📚 هفته_نامه_ادبی_آوای_پراو 🟫@avaye_parav

👍52👏1

2 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC77 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @neveshtankhanemanastVideo

خوانش فراگون خوانش ادبیات کلاسیک و مدرن، ورای انسان محوری؛ خوانشی که می خواهد صدای حیوانات را در ادبیات جهانی، بشنود. کتاب را از کتابفروشی ها بخواهید. @neveshtankhanemanast

👍21👏1

31 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC107 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @DaamaniGol

فارنهایت ۴۵۱ در سیلیکون ولی: چگونه شرکت‌های هوش مصنوعی کتاب‌فروشی‌های دست دوم ما را غارت می‌کنند و کتاب‌ها را نابود می‌کنند (خلاصه ی مقاله ای برگرفته از روزنامه Frankfurter Rundschau) «پروژه پاناما» چیست؟ «پروژه پاناما» نام رمز داخلی یک عملیات مخفیانه توسط شرکت آمریکایی هوش مصنوعی Anthropic است. هدف از این پروژه، به دست آوردن حجم وسیعی از داده های «پاک» برای آموزش مدل های زبانی بزرگ خود، مانند چت بات Claude است. این

3👍3

31 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC99 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🌕 می خواهند که سنگ ها سلام کنند کوه ها پیامی بفرستند تا اعلام کنند که وسوسه تاویل ها ما را ربوده اند و : دشمنانی که روزی ما بوده اند و : اشتیاق هایی که قصه هایی خنده آورند و : مرغ های زیرک جلوی در مجلس جوجه گذاشته اند چه اندازه به یک نام اموال وقفی دیده اند تاکید می کنند: به پیران منحنی گوش نکنید برای بت های مان آستینی ببافیم تا اینجا تنها عنصرمان دولت است این آواز نیست فریاد است و آفتاب بر استخوان های پوسیده سایه ا

3👍1

30 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC112 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

نقاشی #مراد_قلی_پور نام اثر: علیه همه خوانش های قبلی اندازه: ۱۳۰×۹۰

👍3👏1

30 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC98 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ravanshidpoetVideo

گم‌شده‌ها نقاشی‌های م. روان‌شید با صدای فرزاد فرخ

👍3👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gholipour_valad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(Morad gholipour)مراد قلی پور” (@gholipour_valad), 541 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gholipour_valad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.