Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GIFTOR

Channel

GIFTOR

@giftor

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

124,749subscribers

-4,640 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002862689497
TypeChannel
Usernames@giftor @onecase
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/giftor

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

124,749129,389127,0697 August 2026 — 129,389 subscribers8 August 2026 — 129,273 subscribers8 August 2026 — 129,245 subscribers8 August 2026 — 129,171 subscribers9 August 2026 — 129,044 subscribers9 August 2026 — 129,006 subscribers10 August 2026 — 128,799 subscribers10 August 2026 — 128,773 subscribers11 August 2026 — 128,508 subscribers11 August 2026 — 128,494 subscribers12 August 2026 — 128,313 subscribers12 August 2026 — 128,290 subscribers13 August 2026 — 128,103 subscribers13 August 2026 — 128,103 subscribers14 August 2026 — 127,805 subscribers14 August 2026 — 127,805 subscribers16 August 2026 — 127,494 subscribers16 August 2026 — 127,494 subscribers17 August 2026 — 127,190 subscribers17 August 2026 — 127,191 subscribers18 August 2026 — 127,035 subscribers18 August 2026 — 127,024 subscribers19 August 2026 — 126,878 subscribers19 August 2026 — 126,876 subscribers20 August 2026 — 126,731 subscribers20 August 2026 — 126,693 subscribers21 August 2026 — 126,530 subscribers22 August 2026 — 126,500 subscribers23 August 2026 — 126,388 subscribers24 August 2026 — 126,156 subscribers24 August 2026 — 126,039 subscribers25 August 2026 — 125,927 subscribers25 August 2026 — 125,851 subscribers26 August 2026 — 125,784 subscribers26 August 2026 — 125,999 subscribers27 August 2026 — 125,868 subscribers27 August 2026 — 125,773 subscribers28 August 2026 — 125,740 subscribers28 August 2026 — 125,588 subscribers29 August 2026 — 125,543 subscribers29 August 2026 — 125,346 subscribers29 August 2026 — 125,340 subscribers30 August 2026 — 125,147 subscribers31 August 2026 — 125,112 subscribers31 August 2026 — 124,980 subscribers1 September 2026 — 124,913 subscribers1 September 2026 — 124,774 subscribers2 September 2026 — 124,749 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
48 measurements spanning 26 days, net -4,640. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 124,053–130,085 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 03:48124,749-25
1 Sept 2026, 19:34124,774-139
1 Sept 2026, 01:35124,913-67
31 Aug 2026, 17:25124,980-132
31 Aug 2026, 01:44125,112-35
30 Aug 2026, 20:15125,147-193
29 Aug 2026, 22:27125,340-6
29 Aug 2026, 22:08125,346-197
29 Aug 2026, 00:12125,543-45
28 Aug 2026, 19:05125,588-152
28 Aug 2026, 00:45125,740-33
27 Aug 2026, 18:17125,773-95
27 Aug 2026, 04:15125,868-131
26 Aug 2026, 18:53125,999+215
26 Aug 2026, 04:46125,784-67
25 Aug 2026, 17:52125,851-76
25 Aug 2026, 04:58125,927-112
24 Aug 2026, 15:48126,039-117
24 Aug 2026, 00:23126,156-232
23 Aug 2026, 00:29126,388first reading

Engagement

75 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.80%
avg views ÷ 124,749 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,250
73 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.297%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
73
of 75 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held75 (2 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total163,899
Reactions total487
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 01:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

494 reactions across 74 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18236.8%
🔥13928.1%
🤯9018.2%
👍326.48%
💘183.64%
🎉142.83%
😇112.23%
🦄81.62%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
251
across the posts below
Posts paid on
74
of 75 we hold a reading for · 99%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @giftor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 75 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 08:24 UTC969 views7 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026

ДВА ЛЕГКИХ ИКСА 🤑 Закинул подарок — поставил и залутал подарочек который стоит в два раза дороже. Изи профит без лишнего азарта за пару минут ➡️ ИГРАТЬ ◀️

🤯7

1 Sept 2026, 08:24 UTC960 views4 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ну так, простенько, в два раза улучшил кнопку

👍4

31 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,280 views2 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026

ГИФТОР НА ЛЮТОЙ ВЫДАЧЕ 🤫 Пока ты ждёшь — другие лутают, челикс второй день подряд выносит с нашего приложения дорогие гифты. А чего ждёшь ты? ➡️ ИГРАТЬ ◀️

🤯2

31 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,190 views7 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

С 15 тон)) 2 день подряд везет ❤️

🤯6🦄1

31 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC≈1,270 views1 reactions2 Starsread 2 September 2026

ЛЕГЧАЙШИЕ ИКСЫ 🤭 Изи профит от подписчика, со 120 звёзд апнул себе неплохую нфтшку. Чего ждёшь? Скорее залетай и делай также 👇 ➡️ ИГРАТЬ ◀️

🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC≈1,280 views1 reactions2 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

I earned 122 Stars in the Rocket section with just 10 Stars and got a Sakura Gift from the case. Thanks for your great project!♥️

🔥1

30 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,620 views4 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026

ВОТ ЭТО ДРОПЧИК 😎 Подписчик залетел пооткрывать кейсики и залутал прикольную книжку на черном. Залетай и делай также 👇 ➡️ ИГРАТЬ ◀️

🔥4

30 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,610 views4 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

С 3к звёзд выбил! ВПЕРВЫЕ с чего то окупаюсь) Благодарю проект 🙂

🔥4

29 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC≈2,090 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🧾 Мультичек на 1250⭐️ 25⭐️ × 50 чел.

🤯12💘8👍2

29 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC≈2,270 views16 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026

КАЙФОВЫЙ ЗАНОСИК 😇 Челикс открыл BLACK CASE и выбил туфли на черном фоне, вот это удача! Залетай и делай также 👇 ➡️ ИГРАТЬ ◀️

😇9🔥4🤯3

29 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC≈2,150 views14 reactions4 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Да вы клянитесь

🔥65🤯3

28 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈2,140 views3 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026

СКОЛЬКО СКОЛЬКО ИКСОВ? 😳 Челикс поднял все эти гифты с 25 халявных звёзд. И это только с халявы... а представьте если бы он депнул ➡️ ИГРАТЬ ◀️

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @giftor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 371,291 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GIFTOR” (@giftor), 124,749 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/giftor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.