Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NFT Museum

Channel

NFT Museum

@gifts_museum

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,438subscribers

-66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002544596854
TypeChannel
Username@gifts_museum
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gifts_museum

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,4384,5564,4976 August 2026 — 4,504 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,504 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,516 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,521 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,524 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,547 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,549 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,556 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,549 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,535 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,510 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,481 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,460 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,442 subscribers19 September 2026 — 4,438 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net -66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,420–4,574 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:404,438-4
14 Sept 2026, 21:394,442-18
11 Sept 2026, 16:214,460-21
7 Sept 2026, 00:424,481-29
2 Sept 2026, 10:354,510-25
30 Aug 2026, 04:484,535-14
27 Aug 2026, 12:044,549-7
24 Aug 2026, 12:444,556+7
20 Aug 2026, 17:334,549+2
17 Aug 2026, 09:434,547+23
13 Aug 2026, 12:594,524+3
10 Aug 2026, 07:304,521+5
7 Aug 2026, 00:474,516+12
6 Aug 2026, 04:034,504no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:044,504first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,420 reactions across 23 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
48233.9%
🔥24517.3%
custom 54543125340833963041097.68%
🥰704.93%
😁684.79%
😍604.23%
👀523.66%
❤‍🔥513.59%
🤩402.82%
👍332.32%
💘281.97%
🏆251.76%
👏211.48%
🦄191.34%
🤯171.20%
🙊151.06%
🗿130.915%
🙈120.845%
🍌110.775%
custom 522004822443744386690.634%
11 further kinds402.82%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,420 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,391
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 23 we hold a reading for · 96%
Most on one post
700
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gifts_museum. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC540 views25 reactions33 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

11🔥6🥰4🏆2💘1🙈1

10 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈1,240 views43 reactions277 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Warhol moment by @lowtrust 🗽

🏆19🔥11😍93🍾1

10 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,400 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

I guess many people made the nuclear bomb set with 🗽. This one is from @dolboebda

20👏4🔥2🤯1🥰1

3 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈3,680 views75 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Cool cat collection by @techiqqe 🐈‍⬛

30❤‍🔥17🔥11🙊5🙈3🍌2👍2🗿2

2 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC≈3,480 views54 reactions16 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

An amazing set of medals by @hundredtrillionusd. Three identical medals of Viking with Viking shield — and other medals also perfectly matched. 🐱

🔥2013🤩9😎5🏆4🥰3

29 Jul 2026, 00:11 UTC≈4,640 views105 reactions27 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Pretty Froggy Pepa by Spiv 🐸

🥰4328👍21💘9🦄4

28 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC≈4,040 views49 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

That guy @Kokl_23 is sure ready for a movie night. 🕶 🍿 🍿 🍿 🍿 🍿 🍿 🍿 🍿 🍿

🔥1911🙈8custom 52200482244374438667👍2😁2

27 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC≈3,600 views61 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

So @veseus told me a story of how he acquired all these pumpkins — and it was a long way. I think it looks nice. People rarely collect them. 🎁

🔥2113👏13🎃6🌚2🗿2🤣2😈2

26 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC≈3,330 views67 reactions673 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

You can never have enough love and Marylin — by @inspayran.🗽 However, you can have an excess of pink. If you feel poor, tired and financially unstable, stop collecting Fandango immediately and consult your physician.

25👀15🗿9🤣7🔥6custom 54543125340833963043👏2

25 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC≈3,100 views46 reactions11 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥18custom 5454312534083396304119🤩5😈3

21 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC≈3,310 views56 reactions83 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

32🔥13😍8🦄3

19 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC≈3,400 views44 reactions57 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Honestly, @sneak also deserves a mention as a guy with cats and something loading between them. Do you like 🐸?

27custom 545431253408339630410🦄6😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @gifts_museum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NFT Museum” (@gifts_museum), 4,438 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gifts_museum.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.