Тут уже больше 800 готовых образов на каждый день.
А ещё капсулы, шопинг-гиды, стильные приёмы…
Блог Кати Петровой, персонального стилиста.
по вопросам: @petrova_style
Канал включен в перечень РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67907886acea5b7
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
22 measurements spanning 22 days, net -120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,407–10,563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 04:25
10,425
-3
28 Aug 2026, 07:05
10,428
-6
27 Aug 2026, 04:39
10,434
-5
26 Aug 2026, 04:25
10,439
-2
25 Aug 2026, 04:04
10,441
-6
23 Aug 2026, 23:07
10,447
-11
22 Aug 2026, 10:07
10,458
-12
21 Aug 2026, 03:15
10,470
+1
20 Aug 2026, 00:42
10,469
-1
18 Aug 2026, 23:25
10,470
-4
17 Aug 2026, 20:37
10,474
-5
16 Aug 2026, 22:04
10,479
-5
15 Aug 2026, 15:52
10,484
-4
14 Aug 2026, 00:44
10,488
-2
12 Aug 2026, 22:05
10,490
-20
12 Aug 2026, 00:15
10,510
-4
11 Aug 2026, 03:11
10,514
-9
10 Aug 2026, 05:01
10,523
-2
9 Aug 2026, 02:31
10,525
-18
8 Aug 2026, 02:58
10,543
first reading
Engagement
68 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.45%
avg views ÷ 10,425 subscribers
Avg views / post
881
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
68
of 68 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
68 (2 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
59,929
Reactions total
1,847
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,740
Videos
≈145
Links
≈2,370
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,847 reactions across 68 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
727
39.4%
👍
479
25.9%
🔥
407
22.0%
😁
135
7.31%
🥰
35
1.89%
🤔
16
0.866%
🤩
15
0.812%
😍
7
0.379%
👌
5
0.271%
🙈
5
0.271%
💔
3
0.162%
💯
3
0.162%
😐
3
0.162%
⚡
2
0.108%
🤣
2
0.108%
✍
1
0.054%
🎅
1
0.054%
👏
1
0.054%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,847reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
LOOK OF THE DAY
Есть платья для повода, а есть такие, которые повод создают сами: надела — и уже надо куда-то идти. День рождения, свидание, любой вечер, ради которого хочется собираться дольше обычного.
платье | мюли | клатч | серьги | помада
LOOK OF THE DAY
Образ на день, когда дел много и все разные. Единственная роскошь тут — контрастный воротник на рубашке, каблук-рюмочка, и кожа под страуса.
брюки | туфли | рубашка | сумка | серьги
LOOK OF THE DAY
Днём это городской комплект, а вечером достаточно сменить сумку на клатч — и можно идти ужинать. Правда, ужинать в шароварах на резинке до неприличия удобно, и лучше об этом за столом не вспоминать.
шаровары | кардиган | сумка | мюли | серьги | очки
В этом году я впервые взяла себе Vans. До этого неизменно были только Converse. Одна модель. Исключительно белые. Много лет.
И теперь, наверное, я на стороне Vans. Причём в этом сезоне мне нравятся именно цветные. А то что цветные менее универсальны, чем белые или чёрные – это миф. Нет, их так же просто комбинировать в образах.
А вы за Vans или за Converse?
У sanchy появилось элегантное платье на одно плечо. Асимметрия здесь забирает всё внимание на себя и не спорит с пропорциями — такой крой подойдёт многим фигурам. Для вечерних выходов, на каблуке и с клатчем. А днём можно просто добавить мюли и объёмную сумку.
платье 29.000
LOOK OF THE DAY
Есть правило, с которым не поспоришь: громкая вещь в образе может быть только одна. Тут «кричит» юбка. Кардиган молча её успокаивает, а украшения вообще делают вид, что их нет.
юбка | свитер | мюли | сумка | подвеска | серьги
Мне одной кажется, что заказ одежды онлайн — это рулетка?
Ставишь на то, что буква M у бренда означает то же самое, что и у жакета, который висит у тебя в шкафу. Спойлер: не означает.
В примерочную я беру несколько размеров и не смотрю на бирку вообще. В онлайне за эту привычку выставляют счёт: три жакета закажи, три раза заплати, два верни, за возврат плати.
А сообщение «ожидайте курьера с десяти до пятнадцати» о…
Наконец-то анималистичный принт, который никого не съел.
Смотрю на эти сумки и понимаю, почему они не выпадают из образа: в бэмби нет ни одного цвета, которого у вас нет в шкафу. Рыжий, коричневый, белый.
Классно смотрится с денимом и чем-то нейтральным: бежевый, молочный, чёрный, коричневый. Больше ничего не нужно.
Единственное, не сочетайте с другими принтами, пусть остальное будет гладким. Иначе пятна превратят…
LOOK OF THE DAY
Свободный дресс-код — самая коварная формулировка в трудовом договоре. Джинсы вроде можно, но все понимают, что не любые. Вот компромисс на вторник: укороченный жакет, брюки-баллон, балетки и сумка, в которую влезает всё, что вы с собой таскаете.
жакет | джинсы | туфли | сумка | серьги | очки
LIME в этом сезоне просто в ударе по стильной обуви. К таким кедам на осень я бы присмотрелась.
кеды 10.999
❤21👍9🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @glamguide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@glamguide edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 840,917 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dresses @dresses · 50,831 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 August 2026
СТИЛИСТ JENNYHAET @jennyhaet · 47,378 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 27 August 2026
ЛОСКУТОВА МАРИЯ @loskutova_maria · 93,291 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стилизуй это!” (@glamguide), 10,425 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glamguide.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.