Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Футбол глазами арбитра

Channel

Футбол глазами арбитра

@glazamiarbitra

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,704subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002084172127
TypeChannel
Username@glazamiarbitra
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/glazamiarbitra

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,6871,7041,695.56 August 2026 — 1,697 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,697 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,699 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,695 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,687 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,688 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,689 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,692 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,694 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,704 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 34 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,684–1,707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 21:411,704+10
4 Sept 2026, 00:021,694+2
26 Aug 2026, 06:551,692+3
23 Aug 2026, 13:061,689+1
19 Aug 2026, 14:031,688+1
16 Aug 2026, 06:451,687-8
12 Aug 2026, 10:241,695-4
9 Aug 2026, 08:021,699+2
6 Aug 2026, 07:161,697no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:201,697first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 00s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

469 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁8317.7%
custom 54115723953978861767816.6%
custom 54138530702767023486413.6%
5812.4%
💯5311.3%
🔥449.38%
🤣275.76%
👍265.54%
👌102.13%
🤔81.71%
👏71.49%
🤡30.64%
😍20.426%
😱20.426%
🤬20.426%
🙉10.213%
🤷‍♂10.213%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC185 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📊 Интересно ваше мнение @glazamiarbitra

custom 541385307027670234822custom 541157239539788617610🤔21

6 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC335 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

👨 Рефери - это не только знание Правил и их применение на футбольном поле Судейство - это чувство игры, понимание эпизода и правильная трактовка ситуации Шикарный пример на видео: ⚽️ Свисток, моментальная жёлтая карточка - и формально ты прав на 100% Но здесь 💭 анализ ситуации, идеальная пауза и принцип преимущества Итог - победный гол Вот она, порой незаметная, но важнейшая работа рефери #рефери #правилаигры @g

12💯8👍4🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC373 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🧤 Любимая рубрика #голкиперы ) В ЮАР вратарь перепутал линию разметки регби со штрафной линией и пошел отдыхать 🟥 @glazamiarbitra

😁8custom 54115723953978861765🤣3🤡1custom 54138530702767023481

5 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC≈1,980 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🏴 Совсем недавно мы с вами обсуждали эпизоды, в которых положение «вне игры» не фиксируется Вот ещё один показательный пример Даже на самом высоком уровне арбитры не застрахованы от элементарных ошибок #рефери #правилаигры @glazamiarbitra

💯6👍3👌2😱2

4 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC447 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇧🇷 Много слухов о трансфере Виннисиуса в Арсенал Мне кажется было бы интересно Думаю, Артета с ним справится Что думаете? #рефери #винисиус #реалмадрид #арсенал @glazamiarbitra

😁13👏3🤣21

3 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC≈2,380 views108 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🖥 Какую карточку показываем? 🟡/🔴 @glazamiarbitra

custom 541157239539788617663custom 541385307027670234841🤔3🤷‍♂1

31 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC≈3,090 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🇪🇺 Какую красоту положил Илья Шкурин 💪🏼 И вывел свою команду в 3-й раунд квалификации Лиги Конференций 🔥 @glazamiarbitra

🔥264👏2😍1

30 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC734 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 АПЛ на связи 📝 Утвержденные изменения в правилах, которые начнут применяться уже в текущем сезоне Английской Премьер Лиги Как Вам? #рефери #апл #правилаигры @glazamiarbitra

8👍6🤔2😍1

30 Jul 2026, 07:53 UTC613 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

😗 Когда нападающий и рефери в одной весовой - все проще) «Нет фола», соглашаемся 😆 @glazamiarbitra

😁11🤣9💯31

29 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈2,760 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📝 Продолжаем подготовку к большому футбольному сезону и обновляем в памяти #правилаигры 🏴 Нарушения «вне игры» нет, если игрок получает мяч непосредственно после: • удара от ворот • вбрасывания мяча • углового удара В видео примере ассистент проспал, главный по какой то причине тоже 😐 Вышло оч плохо @glazamiarbitra

💯9👍43👌2🤬2😁1

28 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC589 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ Решение IFAB по эпизоду Паредес - Эмболо 🇦🇷 - 🇨🇭 VAR вмешался неправильно Он мог установить, что Паредес не совершал нарушения, и отменить показанную ему жёлтую карточку. Но назначать другое нарушение - симуляцию Эмболо и показывать ему жёлтую карточку VAR не имел права Пункт «ошибочно установлен нарушитель» позволяет исправить личность игрока, совершившего то же самое нарушение, но не заменить одно нарушение др

12💯4👏2🔥1🤔1

28 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC≈2,980 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🧤 Замечал, что у многих болельщиков сформировалось неверное понимание подобных эпизодов ❌ Многие считают: если голкипер находится за пределами штрафной площади, значит и нарушение автоматически произошло за её пределами На самом деле в таких ситуациях значение имеет только одно - место контакта руки с мячом И ничего более 🖥 Отличный свежий пример из чемпионата Польши #рефери #правилаигры #экстракласса @glazamiarb

💯17👍7👌61

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @glazamiarbitra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz191 voters

🖥 Ваше решение

  1. ⚽️ Пенальти24%
  2. 🙅🏼‍♂️ Нет нарушения76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Футбол глазами арбитра” (@glazamiarbitra), 1,704 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glazamiarbitra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.