Channel

⁝𝐠⃪ℓᎥᝲ⃪ܹ̈𝚝᥋ჩ⃪ؔ kᎥᝲ⃪ܹ̈ѕ𑂴̸֙ѕ𑂴̸֙ꫀ݃۫ꭈׁׅ

@glitchk1sser

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003209650676
Type	Channel
Username	@glitchk1sser
Description	Бля мое @DeliosVoid
Created	28 October 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	14 August 2026
Last confirmed live	11 September 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/glitchk1sser

Growth

2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
14 Aug 2026, 23:31	1	no change
12 Aug 2026, 23:15	1	first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 28 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 1
Links: 1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 1 post, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
custom 5280804655712994143	1	16.7%
custom 5282863160523525214	1	16.7%
custom 5282950541633159914	1	16.7%
custom 5282951851598187151	1	16.7%
custom 5282952783606090654	1	16.7%
custom 5283031441637148958	1	16.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2025 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

ᛝᩧDᧉ͠ℓִ𝕚ִꪮ‌ִs ⋮⋮
@AsmodeusTrueIrl · 521 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

⸼ ֵ۫▭̸ׅ࣪▭ׅ࣪ . ׁ 𝅄 ᎓᎒ ❅ ᎒᎓ 𝅄 ׁ . ▭̸ׅ࣪▭ׅ࣪ ⸼
@glitchsangel · 21 post ◟⇉𓈒 ִֺ۪ ︵ ۫᷼︵۫͟͟ ⋮ ✶ ⋮ ۫͟͟︵ ۫᷼︵ ִֺ۪ 𓈒⇇◝
@glitchsgf · 21 post 𓎟 𝅄۫ ִ︵ᩛ۫︵ 𝆥ֵ۫ 𝅄 ⭖᳕ 𝅄 ֵ۫𝆟 ︵ᩛ۫︵ִִ ۫𝅄 𓎟
@glitchskitten · 21 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⁝𝐠⃪ℓᎥᝲ⃪ܹ̈𝚝᥋ჩ⃪ؔ kᎥᝲ⃪ܹ̈ѕ𑂴̸֙ѕ𑂴̸֙ꫀ݃۫ꭈׁׅ” (@glitchk1sser), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glitchk1sser.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.