Channel
@glitterskaleidoscope
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
90subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001164980807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @glitterskaleidoscope |
| Created | 23 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/glitterskaleidoscope |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 90 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 89 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 90 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 89 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 88 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 88 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
127 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 72 | 56.7% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 18.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 14.2% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 4.72% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 3.15% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Giorni difficilissimi, la mia mente mi ha giocato un brutto scherzo. Sto facendo del mio meglio per reagire ma per lo più sto riposando. Usare il cellulare è una faticaccia (anche se piano piano ci provo) quindi vi chiedo gentilmente di non lasciare commenti a questo messaggio. Volevo solo farvi sapere che ci sono ancora, vi penso e non vedo l'ora di tornare 🌸 grazie
❤🔥8🍓1
Ho un sacco di thumbnails e idee ma io veramente non riesco a funzionare con questo caldo (e non ho il condizionatore)... Non vedo l'ora di tornare a fare quello che mi piace + lavorare ai vari progetti senza sentirmi male ogni cinque minuti 😭
❤5🍓3😱2
{Flavio & Pedro 💖🌈✨ (commissione) Quanto sono dolcini i protagonisti del nuovo racconto di Solan? TANTISSIMO 🥺 Io onoratissima e contenta perché ho amato leggerli~ Grazie come sempre amico mio 🌸 #othersocs
❤9🥰3
{Un piccolo #sketch di Shiho (di Whisper me a love song) 💙 Un pensierino per augurare buon compleanno a Manu e ringraziarla per tutto quello che fa sulla sua pagina yuri su ig (questa) 🥺✨
❤11
Comunque scontatissimo lo so ma ci tengo a fare i complimenti a chiunque abbia partecipato ad Art Fight, ho adorato tutto ciò che avete sfornato BRAVISSIM !!! 🥺🌈✨ (poi con questo caldo, rispetto totale ancora di più)
❤8
In provincia il terremoto si è sentito poco ma guardando l'edizione straordinaria e sentendo conoscenze/parenti a Napoli.... Un po' paurina c'è tbh 🫠
😱4❤3
Ovviamente non chiedetemi mai di Arcani maggiori se non volete che parli per ore oops
❤8
Non avevo mai condiviso qui l'art finita di Raisa che avevo fatto in tradizionale e colorato (male) in digitale. A questo proposito, visto che è stata popolarissima durante l'AF: voi gran conoscitori di tarocchi e arcani (!!!!) quali carte associate, anche solo come estetica, o sentimento, a lei? Se vi va proponetene tre. Arcani maggiori, minori, non è rilevante. Potete anche allegare il perché. Se c'è un modo con …
❤2
La mia settima revenge è per TE YUKIIIIIIIIIIII!!! (Grazie per quella Pink,👆 la adoroooo💕💕) Sister Lilith mi ha dato molta soddisfazione con il gioco di luci, ma la parte più difficile è stata scegliere solo una tra tutte le tue stupendissime pupe- CRISI TOTALE VOLEVO FARLE TUTTEEE💕 ╭──────────.★..─╮ https://axylh.carrd.co/ ╰─..★.──────────╯ #Artfight ⋆⁺₊⋆ ━━━━━━━ ⭑ ☆ ⭑ ━━━━━━━ ⋆⁺₊⋆ |☆COMMISSIONS OPEN☆| | VGen| Ko-…
❤2
{Month of Masters 2026 prompt 3 & 4: Maximilian Liebenwein + Free Chocie 🎨 🖌️Opere originali: "Portrait of a woman, reading a book"; "Angelo Musicante" di Rosso Fiorentino 💌Quando ho visto la prima opera avevo già deciso la seconda, quindi mi è presa la bella idea (bella quanto angst per chi conosce gli oc) di scegliere Asmo per la prima così da collegarla al suo partner, Mon (o Monny per gli amici, i nemici e chiu…
❤10🔥1
Grazie per le risposte 🌸
Come dicevo sono due illustrazioni collegate (i personaggi sono una coppia)... Preferite vederli comunque divisi oggi/domani o nello stesso post qui? 👀
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @glitterskaleidoscope. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Come dicevo sono due illustrazioni collegate (i personaggi sono una coppia)... Preferite vederli comunque divisi oggi/domani o nello stesso post qui? 👀
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💖✨Glitter's Kaleidoscope✨💖” (@glitterskaleidoscope), 90 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glitterskaleidoscope.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.